Cargando…

Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment

One natural way to measure model adequacy is by using statistical distances as loss functions. A related fundamental question is how to construct loss functions that are scientifically and statistically meaningful. In this paper, we investigate non-quadratic distances and their role in assessing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markatou, Marianthi, Chen, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060464
_version_ 1783586283031887872
author Markatou, Marianthi
Chen, Yang
author_facet Markatou, Marianthi
Chen, Yang
author_sort Markatou, Marianthi
collection PubMed
description One natural way to measure model adequacy is by using statistical distances as loss functions. A related fundamental question is how to construct loss functions that are scientifically and statistically meaningful. In this paper, we investigate non-quadratic distances and their role in assessing the adequacy of a model and/or ability to perform model selection. We first present the definition of a statistical distance and its associated properties. Three popular distances, total variation, the mixture index of fit and the Kullback-Leibler distance, are studied in detail, with the aim of understanding their properties and potential interpretations that can offer insight into their performance as measures of model misspecification. A small simulation study exemplifies the performance of these measures and their application to different scientific fields is briefly discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7512982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75129822020-11-09 Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment Markatou, Marianthi Chen, Yang Entropy (Basel) Article One natural way to measure model adequacy is by using statistical distances as loss functions. A related fundamental question is how to construct loss functions that are scientifically and statistically meaningful. In this paper, we investigate non-quadratic distances and their role in assessing the adequacy of a model and/or ability to perform model selection. We first present the definition of a statistical distance and its associated properties. Three popular distances, total variation, the mixture index of fit and the Kullback-Leibler distance, are studied in detail, with the aim of understanding their properties and potential interpretations that can offer insight into their performance as measures of model misspecification. A small simulation study exemplifies the performance of these measures and their application to different scientific fields is briefly discussed. MDPI 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7512982/ /pubmed/33265554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060464 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Markatou, Marianthi
Chen, Yang
Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title_full Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title_fullStr Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title_short Non-Quadratic Distances in Model Assessment
title_sort non-quadratic distances in model assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060464
work_keys_str_mv AT markatoumarianthi nonquadraticdistancesinmodelassessment
AT chenyang nonquadraticdistancesinmodelassessment