Cargando…

Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system

OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Neal, Melissa, Murray, Hanna, Dash, Sangita, Al-Hasan, Majdi N., Justo, Julie Ann, Bookstaver, P. Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561
_version_ 1783586289348509696
author O’Neal, Melissa
Murray, Hanna
Dash, Sangita
Al-Hasan, Majdi N.
Justo, Julie Ann
Bookstaver, P. Brandon
author_facet O’Neal, Melissa
Murray, Hanna
Dash, Sangita
Al-Hasan, Majdi N.
Justo, Julie Ann
Bookstaver, P. Brandon
author_sort O’Neal, Melissa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a documented GI multiplex PCR panel from 1 April 2015 through 28 February 2018 were included in the analysis. Inappropriate use of the GI panel was defined as a test obtained without documented diarrhea, greater than 2 days of hospitalization, redundant use with other diagnostic tests (e.g. Clostridioides difficile PCR), or laxative use in the preceding 48 h. Antibiotic use and host variables were compared between groups with positive and negative results. RESULTS: During the study period, 442 GI panels were obtained, among which 268 (61%) were deemed inappropriate. Primary reasons for inappropriate testing were lack of documented diarrhea (n = 92), greater than 2 days of hospitalization (n = 116), having a duplicate C. difficile PCR test ordered (n = 118), or laxative use in the 48 h before testing (n = 36). A total of 141 (32%) GI panels were positive. The most frequently identified pathogens were C. difficile (51.1%, n = 72), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (17.7%, n = 25), and Norovirus GI/GII (12.1%, n = 17). Patients with negative GI panel results were initiated on antibiotics significantly less frequently than those with positive GI panels (62.5% versus 80.2%, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stewardship opportunities exist to optimize the diagnostic application of the GI multiplex PCR panel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7513010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75130102020-10-01 Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system O’Neal, Melissa Murray, Hanna Dash, Sangita Al-Hasan, Majdi N. Justo, Julie Ann Bookstaver, P. Brandon Ther Adv Infect Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a documented GI multiplex PCR panel from 1 April 2015 through 28 February 2018 were included in the analysis. Inappropriate use of the GI panel was defined as a test obtained without documented diarrhea, greater than 2 days of hospitalization, redundant use with other diagnostic tests (e.g. Clostridioides difficile PCR), or laxative use in the preceding 48 h. Antibiotic use and host variables were compared between groups with positive and negative results. RESULTS: During the study period, 442 GI panels were obtained, among which 268 (61%) were deemed inappropriate. Primary reasons for inappropriate testing were lack of documented diarrhea (n = 92), greater than 2 days of hospitalization (n = 116), having a duplicate C. difficile PCR test ordered (n = 118), or laxative use in the 48 h before testing (n = 36). A total of 141 (32%) GI panels were positive. The most frequently identified pathogens were C. difficile (51.1%, n = 72), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (17.7%, n = 25), and Norovirus GI/GII (12.1%, n = 17). Patients with negative GI panel results were initiated on antibiotics significantly less frequently than those with positive GI panels (62.5% versus 80.2%, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stewardship opportunities exist to optimize the diagnostic application of the GI multiplex PCR panel. SAGE Publications 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7513010/ /pubmed/33014363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
O’Neal, Melissa
Murray, Hanna
Dash, Sangita
Al-Hasan, Majdi N.
Justo, Julie Ann
Bookstaver, P. Brandon
Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title_full Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title_fullStr Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title_short Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
title_sort evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561
work_keys_str_mv AT onealmelissa evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem
AT murrayhanna evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem
AT dashsangita evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem
AT alhasanmajdin evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem
AT justojulieann evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem
AT bookstaverpbrandon evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem