Cargando…
Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system
OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561 |
_version_ | 1783586289348509696 |
---|---|
author | O’Neal, Melissa Murray, Hanna Dash, Sangita Al-Hasan, Majdi N. Justo, Julie Ann Bookstaver, P. Brandon |
author_facet | O’Neal, Melissa Murray, Hanna Dash, Sangita Al-Hasan, Majdi N. Justo, Julie Ann Bookstaver, P. Brandon |
author_sort | O’Neal, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a documented GI multiplex PCR panel from 1 April 2015 through 28 February 2018 were included in the analysis. Inappropriate use of the GI panel was defined as a test obtained without documented diarrhea, greater than 2 days of hospitalization, redundant use with other diagnostic tests (e.g. Clostridioides difficile PCR), or laxative use in the preceding 48 h. Antibiotic use and host variables were compared between groups with positive and negative results. RESULTS: During the study period, 442 GI panels were obtained, among which 268 (61%) were deemed inappropriate. Primary reasons for inappropriate testing were lack of documented diarrhea (n = 92), greater than 2 days of hospitalization (n = 116), having a duplicate C. difficile PCR test ordered (n = 118), or laxative use in the 48 h before testing (n = 36). A total of 141 (32%) GI panels were positive. The most frequently identified pathogens were C. difficile (51.1%, n = 72), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (17.7%, n = 25), and Norovirus GI/GII (12.1%, n = 17). Patients with negative GI panel results were initiated on antibiotics significantly less frequently than those with positive GI panels (62.5% versus 80.2%, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stewardship opportunities exist to optimize the diagnostic application of the GI multiplex PCR panel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7513010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75130102020-10-01 Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system O’Neal, Melissa Murray, Hanna Dash, Sangita Al-Hasan, Majdi N. Justo, Julie Ann Bookstaver, P. Brandon Ther Adv Infect Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital. METHODS: All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a documented GI multiplex PCR panel from 1 April 2015 through 28 February 2018 were included in the analysis. Inappropriate use of the GI panel was defined as a test obtained without documented diarrhea, greater than 2 days of hospitalization, redundant use with other diagnostic tests (e.g. Clostridioides difficile PCR), or laxative use in the preceding 48 h. Antibiotic use and host variables were compared between groups with positive and negative results. RESULTS: During the study period, 442 GI panels were obtained, among which 268 (61%) were deemed inappropriate. Primary reasons for inappropriate testing were lack of documented diarrhea (n = 92), greater than 2 days of hospitalization (n = 116), having a duplicate C. difficile PCR test ordered (n = 118), or laxative use in the 48 h before testing (n = 36). A total of 141 (32%) GI panels were positive. The most frequently identified pathogens were C. difficile (51.1%, n = 72), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (17.7%, n = 25), and Norovirus GI/GII (12.1%, n = 17). Patients with negative GI panel results were initiated on antibiotics significantly less frequently than those with positive GI panels (62.5% versus 80.2%, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stewardship opportunities exist to optimize the diagnostic application of the GI multiplex PCR panel. SAGE Publications 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7513010/ /pubmed/33014363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research O’Neal, Melissa Murray, Hanna Dash, Sangita Al-Hasan, Majdi N. Justo, Julie Ann Bookstaver, P. Brandon Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system |
title | Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
title_full | Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
title_fullStr | Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
title_short | Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
title_sort | evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities
of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a
hospital system |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049936120959561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onealmelissa evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem AT murrayhanna evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem AT dashsangita evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem AT alhasanmajdin evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem AT justojulieann evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem AT bookstaverpbrandon evaluatingappropriatenessanddiagnosticstewardshipopportunitiesofmultiplexpolymerasechainreactiongastrointestinaltestingwithinahospitalsystem |