Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103

In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanotto, Edgar D., Mauro, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20090703
Descripción
Sumario:In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues.

Ejemplares similares