Cargando…

Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Modern designs of joint replacements require a large inventory of components to be available during surgery. Pre-operative CT imaging aids 3D surgical planning and implant sizing, which should reduce the inventory size and enhance clinical outcome. We aimed to better understand the impac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Laura, Anna, Henckel, Johann, Hothi, Harry, Hart, Alister
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32965588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00077-2
_version_ 1783586402490908672
author Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hothi, Harry
Hart, Alister
author_facet Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hothi, Harry
Hart, Alister
author_sort Di Laura, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modern designs of joint replacements require a large inventory of components to be available during surgery. Pre-operative CT imaging aids 3D surgical planning and implant sizing, which should reduce the inventory size and enhance clinical outcome. We aimed to better understand the impact of the use of 3D surgical planning and Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) on hip implant inventory. METHODS: An initial feasibility study of 25 consecutive cases was undertaken to assess the discrepancy between the planned component sizes and those implanted to determine whether it was possible to reduce the inventory for future cases. Following this, we performed a pilot study to investigate the effect of an optimized inventory stock on the surgical outcome: we compared a group of 20 consecutive cases (experimental) with the 25 cases in the feasibility study (control). We assessed: (1) accuracy of the 3D planning system in predicting size (%); (2) inventory size changes (%); (3) intra and post-operative complications. RESULTS: The feasibility study showed variability within 1 size range, enabling us to safely optimize inventory stock for the pilot study. (1) 3D surgical planning correctly predicted sizes in 93% of the femoral and 89% of the acetabular cup components; (2) there was a 61% reduction in the implant inventory size; (3) we recorded good surgical outcomes with no difference between the 2 groups, and all patients had appropriately sized implants. CONCLUSIONS: 3D planning is accurate in up to 95% of the cases. CT-based planning can reduce inventory size in the hospital setting potentially leading to a reduction in costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7513524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75135242020-09-25 Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study Di Laura, Anna Henckel, Johann Hothi, Harry Hart, Alister 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Modern designs of joint replacements require a large inventory of components to be available during surgery. Pre-operative CT imaging aids 3D surgical planning and implant sizing, which should reduce the inventory size and enhance clinical outcome. We aimed to better understand the impact of the use of 3D surgical planning and Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) on hip implant inventory. METHODS: An initial feasibility study of 25 consecutive cases was undertaken to assess the discrepancy between the planned component sizes and those implanted to determine whether it was possible to reduce the inventory for future cases. Following this, we performed a pilot study to investigate the effect of an optimized inventory stock on the surgical outcome: we compared a group of 20 consecutive cases (experimental) with the 25 cases in the feasibility study (control). We assessed: (1) accuracy of the 3D planning system in predicting size (%); (2) inventory size changes (%); (3) intra and post-operative complications. RESULTS: The feasibility study showed variability within 1 size range, enabling us to safely optimize inventory stock for the pilot study. (1) 3D surgical planning correctly predicted sizes in 93% of the femoral and 89% of the acetabular cup components; (2) there was a 61% reduction in the implant inventory size; (3) we recorded good surgical outcomes with no difference between the 2 groups, and all patients had appropriately sized implants. CONCLUSIONS: 3D planning is accurate in up to 95% of the cases. CT-based planning can reduce inventory size in the hospital setting potentially leading to a reduction in costs. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7513524/ /pubmed/32965588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00077-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hothi, Harry
Hart, Alister
Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title_full Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title_fullStr Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title_short Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
title_sort can 3d surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? a prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32965588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00077-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dilauraanna can3dsurgicalplanningandpatientspecificinstrumentationreducehipimplantinventoryaprospectivestudy
AT henckeljohann can3dsurgicalplanningandpatientspecificinstrumentationreducehipimplantinventoryaprospectivestudy
AT hothiharry can3dsurgicalplanningandpatientspecificinstrumentationreducehipimplantinventoryaprospectivestudy
AT hartalister can3dsurgicalplanningandpatientspecificinstrumentationreducehipimplantinventoryaprospectivestudy