Cargando…

A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides

BACKGROUND: In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Contai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beriot, Nicolas, Zomer, Paul, Zornoza, Raul, Geissen, Violette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005488
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9876
_version_ 1783586443422072832
author Beriot, Nicolas
Zomer, Paul
Zornoza, Raul
Geissen, Violette
author_facet Beriot, Nicolas
Zomer, Paul
Zornoza, Raul
Geissen, Violette
author_sort Beriot, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Containing (PAC) plastics or “biodegradable” (Bio) plastics. The aim of this research was to measure the sorption pattern of active substances from pesticides on LDPE, PAC and Bio plastic mulches and to compare the decay of the active substances in the presence and absence of plastic debris. METHODS: For this purpose, 38 active substances from 17 insecticides, 15 fungicides and six herbicides commonly applied with plastic mulching in South-east Spain were incubated with a 3 × 3 cm(2) piece of plastic mulch (LDPE, PAC and Bio). The incubation was done in a solution of 10% acetonitrile and 90% distilled water at 35 °C for 15 days in the dark. The Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe approach was adapted to extract the pesticides. RESULTS: The sorption behavior depended on both the pesticide and the plastic mulch type. On average, the sorption percentage was ~23% on LDPE and PAC and ~50% on Bio. The decay of active substances in the presence of plastic was ~30% lesser than the decay of active substances in solution alone. This study is the first attempt at assessing the behavior of a diversity of plastic mulches and pesticides to further define research needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7513747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75137472020-09-30 A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides Beriot, Nicolas Zomer, Paul Zornoza, Raul Geissen, Violette PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Containing (PAC) plastics or “biodegradable” (Bio) plastics. The aim of this research was to measure the sorption pattern of active substances from pesticides on LDPE, PAC and Bio plastic mulches and to compare the decay of the active substances in the presence and absence of plastic debris. METHODS: For this purpose, 38 active substances from 17 insecticides, 15 fungicides and six herbicides commonly applied with plastic mulching in South-east Spain were incubated with a 3 × 3 cm(2) piece of plastic mulch (LDPE, PAC and Bio). The incubation was done in a solution of 10% acetonitrile and 90% distilled water at 35 °C for 15 days in the dark. The Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe approach was adapted to extract the pesticides. RESULTS: The sorption behavior depended on both the pesticide and the plastic mulch type. On average, the sorption percentage was ~23% on LDPE and PAC and ~50% on Bio. The decay of active substances in the presence of plastic was ~30% lesser than the decay of active substances in solution alone. This study is the first attempt at assessing the behavior of a diversity of plastic mulches and pesticides to further define research needs. PeerJ Inc. 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7513747/ /pubmed/33005488 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9876 Text en © 2020 Beriot et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Beriot, Nicolas
Zomer, Paul
Zornoza, Raul
Geissen, Violette
A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_full A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_fullStr A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_full_unstemmed A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_short A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_sort laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005488
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9876
work_keys_str_mv AT beriotnicolas alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT zomerpaul alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT zornozaraul alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT geissenviolette alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT beriotnicolas laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT zomerpaul laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT zornozaraul laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT geissenviolette laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides