Cargando…

Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type on the interradicular miniscrew–root distance available for molar distalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 60 adults with skeletal Class I occlu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Ju-Hyun, Cha, Jung-Yul, Choi, Yoon Jeong, Park, Won-Se, Han, Sang-Sun, Lee, Kee-Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7514046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239759
_version_ 1783586497310490624
author Yoon, Ju-Hyun
Cha, Jung-Yul
Choi, Yoon Jeong
Park, Won-Se
Han, Sang-Sun
Lee, Kee-Joon
author_facet Yoon, Ju-Hyun
Cha, Jung-Yul
Choi, Yoon Jeong
Park, Won-Se
Han, Sang-Sun
Lee, Kee-Joon
author_sort Yoon, Ju-Hyun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type on the interradicular miniscrew–root distance available for molar distalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 60 adults with skeletal Class I occlusion exhibiting hyperdivergent (n = 20), normodivergent (n = 20), and hypodivergent (n = 20) facial types were used. Placement of a 6-mm long, 1.5-mm diameter, tapered miniscrew was simulated at a site 4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, with insertion angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to the transverse occlusal plane. The shortest linear distance between the miniscrew and anterior root at four interradicular sites was measured: maxillary second premolar and first molar (Mx 5–6), maxillary first and second molars (Mx 6–7), mandibular second premolar and first molar (Mn 5–6), and mandibular first and second molars (Mn 6–7). RESULTS: Miniscrew–root distance significantly increased as the insertion angle increased from 0° to 60°. In the mandible, the distances significantly differed among vertical facial types, increasing in the following order: hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent. The minimum mean distance was found in the Mx 6–7 (30°; 0.86±0.35 mm), and the maximum mean distance was found in the Mn 5–6 (60°; 2.64±0.56 mm). The rates of miniscrews located buccally outside the root distalization path were up to 70% and 55% when the miniscrews were placed at 60° insertion angles in the Mx 5–6 and Mn 5–6 regions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Miniscrew–root distance increased significantly with the increased insertion angle, and the amount of increase was affected by the miniscrew placement site and vertical facial type. To ensure adequate distalization of the posterior segment, the miniscrew should be inserted at an angle in the interradicular area between the second premolar and first molar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7514046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75140462020-10-01 Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type Yoon, Ju-Hyun Cha, Jung-Yul Choi, Yoon Jeong Park, Won-Se Han, Sang-Sun Lee, Kee-Joon PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type on the interradicular miniscrew–root distance available for molar distalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 60 adults with skeletal Class I occlusion exhibiting hyperdivergent (n = 20), normodivergent (n = 20), and hypodivergent (n = 20) facial types were used. Placement of a 6-mm long, 1.5-mm diameter, tapered miniscrew was simulated at a site 4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, with insertion angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to the transverse occlusal plane. The shortest linear distance between the miniscrew and anterior root at four interradicular sites was measured: maxillary second premolar and first molar (Mx 5–6), maxillary first and second molars (Mx 6–7), mandibular second premolar and first molar (Mn 5–6), and mandibular first and second molars (Mn 6–7). RESULTS: Miniscrew–root distance significantly increased as the insertion angle increased from 0° to 60°. In the mandible, the distances significantly differed among vertical facial types, increasing in the following order: hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent. The minimum mean distance was found in the Mx 6–7 (30°; 0.86±0.35 mm), and the maximum mean distance was found in the Mn 5–6 (60°; 2.64±0.56 mm). The rates of miniscrews located buccally outside the root distalization path were up to 70% and 55% when the miniscrews were placed at 60° insertion angles in the Mx 5–6 and Mn 5–6 regions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Miniscrew–root distance increased significantly with the increased insertion angle, and the amount of increase was affected by the miniscrew placement site and vertical facial type. To ensure adequate distalization of the posterior segment, the miniscrew should be inserted at an angle in the interradicular area between the second premolar and first molar. Public Library of Science 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7514046/ /pubmed/32970759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239759 Text en © 2020 Yoon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yoon, Ju-Hyun
Cha, Jung-Yul
Choi, Yoon Jeong
Park, Won-Se
Han, Sang-Sun
Lee, Kee-Joon
Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title_full Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title_fullStr Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title_short Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
title_sort simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7514046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239759
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonjuhyun simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype
AT chajungyul simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype
AT choiyoonjeong simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype
AT parkwonse simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype
AT hansangsun simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype
AT leekeejoon simulationofminiscrewrootdistanceavailableformolardistalizationdependingontheminiscrewinsertionangleandverticalfacialtype