Cargando…

Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources

This paper presents a theoretical investigation of a new configuration of the combined power and cooling cycle known as the Goswami cycle. The new configuration consists of two turbines operating at two different working pressures with a low-heat source temperature, below 150 °C. A comprehensive ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guzmán, Gustavo, De Los Reyes, Lucía, Noriega, Eliana, Ramírez, Hermes, Bula, Antonio, Fontalvo, Armando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21070711
_version_ 1783586770738216960
author Guzmán, Gustavo
De Los Reyes, Lucía
Noriega, Eliana
Ramírez, Hermes
Bula, Antonio
Fontalvo, Armando
author_facet Guzmán, Gustavo
De Los Reyes, Lucía
Noriega, Eliana
Ramírez, Hermes
Bula, Antonio
Fontalvo, Armando
author_sort Guzmán, Gustavo
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a theoretical investigation of a new configuration of the combined power and cooling cycle known as the Goswami cycle. The new configuration consists of two turbines operating at two different working pressures with a low-heat source temperature, below 150 °C. A comprehensive analysis was conducted to determine the effect of key operation parameters such as ammonia mass fraction at the absorber outlet and boiler-rectifier, on the power output, cooling capacity, effective first efficiency, and effective exergy efficiency, while the performance of the dual-pressure configuration was compared with the original single pressure cycle. In addition, a Pareto optimization with a genetic algorithm was conducted to obtain the best power and cooling output combinations to maximize effective first law efficiency. Results showed that the new dual-pressure configuration generated more power than the single pressure cycle, by producing up to 327.8 kW, while the single pressure cycle produced up to 110.8 kW at a 150 °C boiler temperature. However, the results also showed that it reduced the cooling output as there was less mass flow rate in the refrigeration unit. Optimization results showed that optimum effective first law efficiency ranged between 9.1% and 13.7%. The maximum effective first law efficiency at the lowest net power (32 kW) and cooling (0.38 kW) outputs was also shown. On the other hand, it presented 13.6% effective first law efficiency when the net power output was 100 kW and the cooling capacity was 0.38 kW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7515226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75152262020-11-09 Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources Guzmán, Gustavo De Los Reyes, Lucía Noriega, Eliana Ramírez, Hermes Bula, Antonio Fontalvo, Armando Entropy (Basel) Article This paper presents a theoretical investigation of a new configuration of the combined power and cooling cycle known as the Goswami cycle. The new configuration consists of two turbines operating at two different working pressures with a low-heat source temperature, below 150 °C. A comprehensive analysis was conducted to determine the effect of key operation parameters such as ammonia mass fraction at the absorber outlet and boiler-rectifier, on the power output, cooling capacity, effective first efficiency, and effective exergy efficiency, while the performance of the dual-pressure configuration was compared with the original single pressure cycle. In addition, a Pareto optimization with a genetic algorithm was conducted to obtain the best power and cooling output combinations to maximize effective first law efficiency. Results showed that the new dual-pressure configuration generated more power than the single pressure cycle, by producing up to 327.8 kW, while the single pressure cycle produced up to 110.8 kW at a 150 °C boiler temperature. However, the results also showed that it reduced the cooling output as there was less mass flow rate in the refrigeration unit. Optimization results showed that optimum effective first law efficiency ranged between 9.1% and 13.7%. The maximum effective first law efficiency at the lowest net power (32 kW) and cooling (0.38 kW) outputs was also shown. On the other hand, it presented 13.6% effective first law efficiency when the net power output was 100 kW and the cooling capacity was 0.38 kW. MDPI 2019-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7515226/ /pubmed/33267425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21070711 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guzmán, Gustavo
De Los Reyes, Lucía
Noriega, Eliana
Ramírez, Hermes
Bula, Antonio
Fontalvo, Armando
Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title_full Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title_fullStr Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title_full_unstemmed Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title_short Thermal Optimization of a Dual Pressure Goswami Cycle for Low Grade Thermal Sources
title_sort thermal optimization of a dual pressure goswami cycle for low grade thermal sources
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21070711
work_keys_str_mv AT guzmangustavo thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources
AT delosreyeslucia thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources
AT noriegaeliana thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources
AT ramirezhermes thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources
AT bulaantonio thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources
AT fontalvoarmando thermaloptimizationofadualpressuregoswamicycleforlowgradethermalsources