Cargando…
Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors
In this paper, we firstly study the security enhancement of three steganographic methods by using a proposed chaotic system. The first method, namely the Enhanced Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited (EEALSBMR), is present in the spatial domain. The two other methods, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21080748 |
_version_ | 1783586780173303808 |
---|---|
author | Battikh, Dalia El Assad, Safwan Hoang, Thang Manh Bakhache, Bassem Deforges, Olivier Khalil, Mohamad |
author_facet | Battikh, Dalia El Assad, Safwan Hoang, Thang Manh Bakhache, Bassem Deforges, Olivier Khalil, Mohamad |
author_sort | Battikh, Dalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we firstly study the security enhancement of three steganographic methods by using a proposed chaotic system. The first method, namely the Enhanced Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited (EEALSBMR), is present in the spatial domain. The two other methods, the Enhanced Discrete Cosine Transform (EDCT) and Enhanced Discrete Wavelet transform (EDWT), are present in the frequency domain. The chaotic system is extremely robust and consists of a strong chaotic generator and a 2-D Cat map. Its main role is to secure the content of a message in case a message is detected. Secondly, three blind steganalysis methods, based on multi-resolution wavelet decomposition, are used to detect whether an embedded message is hidden in the tested image (stego image) or not (cover image). The steganalysis approach is based on the hypothesis that message-embedding schemes leave statistical evidence or structure in images that can be exploited for detection. The simulation results show that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and the Fisher Linear Discriminant (FLD) cannot distinguish between cover and stego images if the message size is smaller than 20% in the EEALSBMR steganographic method and if the message size is smaller than 15% in the EDCT steganographic method. However, SVM and FLD can distinguish between cover and stego images with reasonable accuracy in the EDWT steganographic method, irrespective of the message size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7515277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75152772020-11-09 Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors Battikh, Dalia El Assad, Safwan Hoang, Thang Manh Bakhache, Bassem Deforges, Olivier Khalil, Mohamad Entropy (Basel) Article In this paper, we firstly study the security enhancement of three steganographic methods by using a proposed chaotic system. The first method, namely the Enhanced Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited (EEALSBMR), is present in the spatial domain. The two other methods, the Enhanced Discrete Cosine Transform (EDCT) and Enhanced Discrete Wavelet transform (EDWT), are present in the frequency domain. The chaotic system is extremely robust and consists of a strong chaotic generator and a 2-D Cat map. Its main role is to secure the content of a message in case a message is detected. Secondly, three blind steganalysis methods, based on multi-resolution wavelet decomposition, are used to detect whether an embedded message is hidden in the tested image (stego image) or not (cover image). The steganalysis approach is based on the hypothesis that message-embedding schemes leave statistical evidence or structure in images that can be exploited for detection. The simulation results show that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and the Fisher Linear Discriminant (FLD) cannot distinguish between cover and stego images if the message size is smaller than 20% in the EEALSBMR steganographic method and if the message size is smaller than 15% in the EDCT steganographic method. However, SVM and FLD can distinguish between cover and stego images with reasonable accuracy in the EDWT steganographic method, irrespective of the message size. MDPI 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7515277/ /pubmed/33267462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21080748 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Battikh, Dalia El Assad, Safwan Hoang, Thang Manh Bakhache, Bassem Deforges, Olivier Khalil, Mohamad Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title | Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title_full | Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title_short | Comparative Study of Three Steganographic Methods Using a Chaotic System and Their Universal Steganalysis Based on Three Feature Vectors |
title_sort | comparative study of three steganographic methods using a chaotic system and their universal steganalysis based on three feature vectors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21080748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battikhdalia comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors AT elassadsafwan comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors AT hoangthangmanh comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors AT bakhachebassem comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors AT deforgesolivier comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors AT khalilmohamad comparativestudyofthreesteganographicmethodsusingachaoticsystemandtheiruniversalsteganalysisbasedonthreefeaturevectors |