Cargando…
Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs
We present a quantum scheme for signing contracts between two clients (Alice and Bob) using entangled states and the services of a third trusted party (Trent). The trusted party is only contacted for the initialization of the protocol, and possibly at the end, to verify clients’ honesty and deliver...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21090821 |
_version_ | 1783586797236781056 |
---|---|
author | Yadav, Preeti Mateus, Paulo Paunković, Nikola Souto, André |
author_facet | Yadav, Preeti Mateus, Paulo Paunković, Nikola Souto, André |
author_sort | Yadav, Preeti |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a quantum scheme for signing contracts between two clients (Alice and Bob) using entangled states and the services of a third trusted party (Trent). The trusted party is only contacted for the initialization of the protocol, and possibly at the end, to verify clients’ honesty and deliver signed certificates. The protocol is fair, i.e., the probability that a client, say Bob, can obtain a signed copy of the contract, while Alice cannot, can be made arbitrarily small, and scales as [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is the total number of rounds (communications between the two clients) of the protocol. Thus, the protocol is optimistic, as cheating is not successful, and the clients rarely have to contact Trent to confirm their honesty by delivering the actual signed certificates of the contract. Unlike the previous protocol (Paunković et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 062331 (2011)), in the present proposal, a single client can obtain the signed contract alone, without the need for the other client’s presence. When first contacting Trent, the clients do not have to agree upon a definitive contract. Moreover, even upon terminating the protocol, the clients do not reveal the actual contract to Trent. Finally, the protocol is based on the laws of physics, rather than on mathematical conjectures and the exchange of a large number of signed authenticated messages during the actual contract signing process. Therefore, it is abuse-free, as Alice and Bob cannot prove they are involved in the contract signing process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7515350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75153502020-11-09 Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs Yadav, Preeti Mateus, Paulo Paunković, Nikola Souto, André Entropy (Basel) Article We present a quantum scheme for signing contracts between two clients (Alice and Bob) using entangled states and the services of a third trusted party (Trent). The trusted party is only contacted for the initialization of the protocol, and possibly at the end, to verify clients’ honesty and deliver signed certificates. The protocol is fair, i.e., the probability that a client, say Bob, can obtain a signed copy of the contract, while Alice cannot, can be made arbitrarily small, and scales as [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is the total number of rounds (communications between the two clients) of the protocol. Thus, the protocol is optimistic, as cheating is not successful, and the clients rarely have to contact Trent to confirm their honesty by delivering the actual signed certificates of the contract. Unlike the previous protocol (Paunković et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 062331 (2011)), in the present proposal, a single client can obtain the signed contract alone, without the need for the other client’s presence. When first contacting Trent, the clients do not have to agree upon a definitive contract. Moreover, even upon terminating the protocol, the clients do not reveal the actual contract to Trent. Finally, the protocol is based on the laws of physics, rather than on mathematical conjectures and the exchange of a large number of signed authenticated messages during the actual contract signing process. Therefore, it is abuse-free, as Alice and Bob cannot prove they are involved in the contract signing process. MDPI 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7515350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21090821 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yadav, Preeti Mateus, Paulo Paunković, Nikola Souto, André Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title | Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title_full | Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title_fullStr | Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title_short | Quantum Contract Signing with Entangled Pairs |
title_sort | quantum contract signing with entangled pairs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21090821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadavpreeti quantumcontractsigningwithentangledpairs AT mateuspaulo quantumcontractsigningwithentangledpairs AT paunkovicnikola quantumcontractsigningwithentangledpairs AT soutoandre quantumcontractsigningwithentangledpairs |