Cargando…

Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting

STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehr, A. Mechteld, Oner, F. Cumhur, Delawi, Diyar, Stellato, Rebecca K., Hoebink, Eric A., Kempen, Diederik H.R., van Susante, Job L.C., Castelein, René M., Kruyt, Moyo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558
_version_ 1783586822962544640
author Lehr, A. Mechteld
Oner, F. Cumhur
Delawi, Diyar
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Hoebink, Eric A.
Kempen, Diederik H.R.
van Susante, Job L.C.
Castelein, René M.
Kruyt, Moyo C.
author_facet Lehr, A. Mechteld
Oner, F. Cumhur
Delawi, Diyar
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Hoebink, Eric A.
Kempen, Diederik H.R.
van Susante, Job L.C.
Castelein, René M.
Kruyt, Moyo C.
author_sort Lehr, A. Mechteld
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to compare PLF rates between 1 and 2 years of follow-up and between graft types, and to explore the role of bone grafting based on the location of the PLF mass. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. There are indications that bony fusion proceeds over time, but it is unknown to what extent this can be related to bone grafting. METHODS. A total of 100 adult patients underwent a primary, single- or multilevel, thoracolumbar PLF. After instrumentation and preparation for grafting, the randomized allocation side of AttraX(®) Putty was disclosed. The contralateral posterolateral gutters were grafted with autograft. At 1-year follow-up, and in case of no fusion at 2 years, the fusion status of both sides of each segment was blindly assessed on CT scans. Intertransverse and facet fusion were scored separately. Difference in fusion rates after 1 and 2 years and between grafts were analyzed with a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model (P < 0.05). RESULTS. The 2-year PLF rate (66 patients) was 70% at the AttraX(®) Putty and 68% at the autograft side, compared to 55% and 52% after 1 year (87 patients). GEE analysis demonstrated a significant increase for both conditions (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5–2.7, P < 0.001), but no difference between the grafts (P = 0.595). Ongoing bone formation was only observed between the facet joints. CONCLUSION. This intra-patient controlled trial demonstrated a significant increase in PLF rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion, but no difference between AttraX(®) Putty and autograft. Based on the location of the PLF mass, this increase is most likely the result of immobilization instead of grafting. Level of Evidence: 1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7515483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75154832020-10-14 Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting Lehr, A. Mechteld Oner, F. Cumhur Delawi, Diyar Stellato, Rebecca K. Hoebink, Eric A. Kempen, Diederik H.R. van Susante, Job L.C. Castelein, René M. Kruyt, Moyo C. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Randomized Trial STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to compare PLF rates between 1 and 2 years of follow-up and between graft types, and to explore the role of bone grafting based on the location of the PLF mass. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. There are indications that bony fusion proceeds over time, but it is unknown to what extent this can be related to bone grafting. METHODS. A total of 100 adult patients underwent a primary, single- or multilevel, thoracolumbar PLF. After instrumentation and preparation for grafting, the randomized allocation side of AttraX(®) Putty was disclosed. The contralateral posterolateral gutters were grafted with autograft. At 1-year follow-up, and in case of no fusion at 2 years, the fusion status of both sides of each segment was blindly assessed on CT scans. Intertransverse and facet fusion were scored separately. Difference in fusion rates after 1 and 2 years and between grafts were analyzed with a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model (P < 0.05). RESULTS. The 2-year PLF rate (66 patients) was 70% at the AttraX(®) Putty and 68% at the autograft side, compared to 55% and 52% after 1 year (87 patients). GEE analysis demonstrated a significant increase for both conditions (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5–2.7, P < 0.001), but no difference between the grafts (P = 0.595). Ongoing bone formation was only observed between the facet joints. CONCLUSION. This intra-patient controlled trial demonstrated a significant increase in PLF rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion, but no difference between AttraX(®) Putty and autograft. Based on the location of the PLF mass, this increase is most likely the result of immobilization instead of grafting. Level of Evidence: 1 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-15 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7515483/ /pubmed/32459724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Randomized Trial
Lehr, A. Mechteld
Oner, F. Cumhur
Delawi, Diyar
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Hoebink, Eric A.
Kempen, Diederik H.R.
van Susante, Job L.C.
Castelein, René M.
Kruyt, Moyo C.
Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title_full Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title_fullStr Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title_short Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
title_sort increasing fusion rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and the role of bone grafting
topic Randomized Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558
work_keys_str_mv AT lehramechteld increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT onerfcumhur increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT delawidiyar increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT stellatorebeccak increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT hoebinkerica increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT kempendiederikhr increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT vansusantejoblc increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT casteleinrenem increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting
AT kruytmoyoc increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting