Cargando…
Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting
STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558 |
_version_ | 1783586822962544640 |
---|---|
author | Lehr, A. Mechteld Oner, F. Cumhur Delawi, Diyar Stellato, Rebecca K. Hoebink, Eric A. Kempen, Diederik H.R. van Susante, Job L.C. Castelein, René M. Kruyt, Moyo C. |
author_facet | Lehr, A. Mechteld Oner, F. Cumhur Delawi, Diyar Stellato, Rebecca K. Hoebink, Eric A. Kempen, Diederik H.R. van Susante, Job L.C. Castelein, René M. Kruyt, Moyo C. |
author_sort | Lehr, A. Mechteld |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to compare PLF rates between 1 and 2 years of follow-up and between graft types, and to explore the role of bone grafting based on the location of the PLF mass. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. There are indications that bony fusion proceeds over time, but it is unknown to what extent this can be related to bone grafting. METHODS. A total of 100 adult patients underwent a primary, single- or multilevel, thoracolumbar PLF. After instrumentation and preparation for grafting, the randomized allocation side of AttraX(®) Putty was disclosed. The contralateral posterolateral gutters were grafted with autograft. At 1-year follow-up, and in case of no fusion at 2 years, the fusion status of both sides of each segment was blindly assessed on CT scans. Intertransverse and facet fusion were scored separately. Difference in fusion rates after 1 and 2 years and between grafts were analyzed with a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model (P < 0.05). RESULTS. The 2-year PLF rate (66 patients) was 70% at the AttraX(®) Putty and 68% at the autograft side, compared to 55% and 52% after 1 year (87 patients). GEE analysis demonstrated a significant increase for both conditions (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5–2.7, P < 0.001), but no difference between the grafts (P = 0.595). Ongoing bone formation was only observed between the facet joints. CONCLUSION. This intra-patient controlled trial demonstrated a significant increase in PLF rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion, but no difference between AttraX(®) Putty and autograft. Based on the location of the PLF mass, this increase is most likely the result of immobilization instead of grafting. Level of Evidence: 1 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7515483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75154832020-10-14 Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting Lehr, A. Mechteld Oner, F. Cumhur Delawi, Diyar Stellato, Rebecca K. Hoebink, Eric A. Kempen, Diederik H.R. van Susante, Job L.C. Castelein, René M. Kruyt, Moyo C. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Randomized Trial STUDY DESIGN. Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX(®) Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery. OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study was to compare PLF rates between 1 and 2 years of follow-up and between graft types, and to explore the role of bone grafting based on the location of the PLF mass. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. There are indications that bony fusion proceeds over time, but it is unknown to what extent this can be related to bone grafting. METHODS. A total of 100 adult patients underwent a primary, single- or multilevel, thoracolumbar PLF. After instrumentation and preparation for grafting, the randomized allocation side of AttraX(®) Putty was disclosed. The contralateral posterolateral gutters were grafted with autograft. At 1-year follow-up, and in case of no fusion at 2 years, the fusion status of both sides of each segment was blindly assessed on CT scans. Intertransverse and facet fusion were scored separately. Difference in fusion rates after 1 and 2 years and between grafts were analyzed with a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model (P < 0.05). RESULTS. The 2-year PLF rate (66 patients) was 70% at the AttraX(®) Putty and 68% at the autograft side, compared to 55% and 52% after 1 year (87 patients). GEE analysis demonstrated a significant increase for both conditions (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5–2.7, P < 0.001), but no difference between the grafts (P = 0.595). Ongoing bone formation was only observed between the facet joints. CONCLUSION. This intra-patient controlled trial demonstrated a significant increase in PLF rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion, but no difference between AttraX(®) Putty and autograft. Based on the location of the PLF mass, this increase is most likely the result of immobilization instead of grafting. Level of Evidence: 1 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-15 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7515483/ /pubmed/32459724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Randomized Trial Lehr, A. Mechteld Oner, F. Cumhur Delawi, Diyar Stellato, Rebecca K. Hoebink, Eric A. Kempen, Diederik H.R. van Susante, Job L.C. Castelein, René M. Kruyt, Moyo C. Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title | Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title_full | Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title_fullStr | Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title_short | Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting |
title_sort | increasing fusion rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and the role of bone grafting |
topic | Randomized Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehramechteld increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT onerfcumhur increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT delawidiyar increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT stellatorebeccak increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT hoebinkerica increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT kempendiederikhr increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT vansusantejoblc increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT casteleinrenem increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting AT kruytmoyoc increasingfusionratebetween1and2yearsafterinstrumentedposterolateralspinalfusionandtheroleofbonegrafting |