Cargando…

Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Objective To investigate the anticoagulation practice in patients presenting with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during sepsis and septic shock with one-year follow-up since discharge and to evaluate factors associated with the development of NOAF. Methods A retrospective observational cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arunachalam, Karuppiah, Kalyan Sundaram, Arvind, Jha, Kunal, Thakur, Lokendra, Pond, Kyle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983720
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10026
_version_ 1783586877506322432
author Arunachalam, Karuppiah
Kalyan Sundaram, Arvind
Jha, Kunal
Thakur, Lokendra
Pond, Kyle
author_facet Arunachalam, Karuppiah
Kalyan Sundaram, Arvind
Jha, Kunal
Thakur, Lokendra
Pond, Kyle
author_sort Arunachalam, Karuppiah
collection PubMed
description Objective To investigate the anticoagulation practice in patients presenting with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during sepsis and septic shock with one-year follow-up since discharge and to evaluate factors associated with the development of NOAF. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using chart review in patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock.  Results There was a total of 1132 patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock over a one-year period. Thirty-two patients were found to have NOAF in the setting of sepsis. Of this, eight (25%) patients were anticoagulated with warfarin and 14 (44%) patients were not anticoagulated during discharge. At one-year follow-up post-discharge, nine (29%) patients continued on warfarin and 16 (52%) patients remained not anticoagulated. Conclusion We found that the majority of patients who developed NOAF did not get anticoagulated at the time of discharge. A similar trend followed after one year of follow-up. Since proper treatment guidelines are not in place, these patients are at high risk for recurrent atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and death. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7515803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75158032020-09-26 Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study Arunachalam, Karuppiah Kalyan Sundaram, Arvind Jha, Kunal Thakur, Lokendra Pond, Kyle Cureus Cardiology Objective To investigate the anticoagulation practice in patients presenting with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during sepsis and septic shock with one-year follow-up since discharge and to evaluate factors associated with the development of NOAF. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using chart review in patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock.  Results There was a total of 1132 patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock over a one-year period. Thirty-two patients were found to have NOAF in the setting of sepsis. Of this, eight (25%) patients were anticoagulated with warfarin and 14 (44%) patients were not anticoagulated during discharge. At one-year follow-up post-discharge, nine (29%) patients continued on warfarin and 16 (52%) patients remained not anticoagulated. Conclusion We found that the majority of patients who developed NOAF did not get anticoagulated at the time of discharge. A similar trend followed after one year of follow-up. Since proper treatment guidelines are not in place, these patients are at high risk for recurrent atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and death.  Cureus 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7515803/ /pubmed/32983720 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10026 Text en Copyright © 2020, Arunachalam et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Arunachalam, Karuppiah
Kalyan Sundaram, Arvind
Jha, Kunal
Thakur, Lokendra
Pond, Kyle
Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title_short Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
title_sort evaluation of anticoagulation practice with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sepsis and septic shock in medical intensive care unit: a retrospective observational cohort study
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983720
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10026
work_keys_str_mv AT arunachalamkaruppiah evaluationofanticoagulationpracticewithnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithsepsisandsepticshockinmedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT kalyansundaramarvind evaluationofanticoagulationpracticewithnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithsepsisandsepticshockinmedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT jhakunal evaluationofanticoagulationpracticewithnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithsepsisandsepticshockinmedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT thakurlokendra evaluationofanticoagulationpracticewithnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithsepsisandsepticshockinmedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT pondkyle evaluationofanticoagulationpracticewithnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithsepsisandsepticshockinmedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy