Cargando…

The outcome of kidney transplant from living donors with pelvi-ureteric junction dysfunction

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of receiving a kidney with PUJ dysfunction on the recipient renal graft function. METHODOLOGY: 198 patients, who underwent renal transplantation from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2014 in a single Center in the North West of England, were retrospectively reviewed us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tisljar, Miroslav, Ali, Hatem, Gledhill-Flynn, Charlie, Garreus, Mila, Ponnusamy, Arvind, Ahmed, Aimun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7515856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02522-x
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To assess the effect of receiving a kidney with PUJ dysfunction on the recipient renal graft function. METHODOLOGY: 198 patients, who underwent renal transplantation from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2014 in a single Center in the North West of England, were retrospectively reviewed using a computerized database. Split kidney function and the PUJ dysfunction for the donors were assessed using Tc-99 m MAG3 renogram. Each recipient with PUJ dysfunction was matched with a control recipient by age, gender, and number of days after transplantation. Both groups were followed up for 3.5 years post-transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 198 recipients included in the study, 19 recipients received kidneys from donors with PUJ dysfunction. Prevalence of PUJ dysfunction was 9.5% and it was more common in males than females. There was no difference between the case group and the control group in terms of age, gender, and follow-up time post-transplantation. There was also no difference between the case group and the control group in mean creatinine (130 µmol/l and 138 µmol/l respectively, p = 0.305) or the mean eGFR (48.6 ml/min and 47.5 ml/min respectively, p = 0.054) at 3.5 year post-kidney transplantation. CONCLUSION: This study showed that PUJ dysfunction of renal allograft has a negligible effect on graft function over 3.5 years period post-transplantation. A prospective randomized trial is needed to test these findings. In the presence of widened gap between demand and supply in renal transplantation, PUJ dysfunction in potential donors should not preclude them from donation.