Cargando…

Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality

Average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is broadly recommended, using one of several endorsed test options. However, CRC screening participation rates remain below national goals. To gain further insights regarding recent, population-based patterns in overall and test-specific CRC screening p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finney Rutten, Lila J., Jacobson, Debra J., Jenkins, Gregory D., Fan, Chun, Weiser, Emily, Parks, Philip, Doroshenk, Mary, Limburg, Paul J., St. Sauver, Jennifer L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32995145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101202
_version_ 1783586948256890880
author Finney Rutten, Lila J.
Jacobson, Debra J.
Jenkins, Gregory D.
Fan, Chun
Weiser, Emily
Parks, Philip
Doroshenk, Mary
Limburg, Paul J.
St. Sauver, Jennifer L.
author_facet Finney Rutten, Lila J.
Jacobson, Debra J.
Jenkins, Gregory D.
Fan, Chun
Weiser, Emily
Parks, Philip
Doroshenk, Mary
Limburg, Paul J.
St. Sauver, Jennifer L.
author_sort Finney Rutten, Lila J.
collection PubMed
description Average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is broadly recommended, using one of several endorsed test options. However, CRC screening participation rates remain below national goals. To gain further insights regarding recent, population-based patterns in overall and test-specific CRC screening participation, we conducted a retrospective study of adults, ages 50–75 years, utilizing comprehensive data resources from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Among residents of Olmsted County, MN eligible and due for CRC screening, we identified 5818 residents across three annual cohorts who completed screening between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. We summarized CRC screening rates as incidence per 1000 population and used Poisson regression to test for overall and mode-specific CRC trends. We also analyzed rates of follow-up colonoscopy within 6-months after a positive stool-based screening result. While no significant differences over time were observed in overall CRC screening incidence rates among those due for screening, we observed a statistically significant increase in mt-sDNA test and statistically significant decreases in screening colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT test completion rates; differences in screening overall and by modality were observed by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The diagnostic colonoscopy follow-up rate within six months after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher following mt-sDNA (84.9%) compared to FIT/FOBT (42.6%). In this retrospective, population-based study, overall CRC screening incidence rates remained stable from 2016 to 2018, while test-specific rates for mt-sDNA significantly increased and decreased for colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT. Adherence with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher among patients who underwent mt-sDNA screening compared to FIT/FOBT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7516167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75161672020-09-28 Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality Finney Rutten, Lila J. Jacobson, Debra J. Jenkins, Gregory D. Fan, Chun Weiser, Emily Parks, Philip Doroshenk, Mary Limburg, Paul J. St. Sauver, Jennifer L. Prev Med Rep Regular Article Average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is broadly recommended, using one of several endorsed test options. However, CRC screening participation rates remain below national goals. To gain further insights regarding recent, population-based patterns in overall and test-specific CRC screening participation, we conducted a retrospective study of adults, ages 50–75 years, utilizing comprehensive data resources from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Among residents of Olmsted County, MN eligible and due for CRC screening, we identified 5818 residents across three annual cohorts who completed screening between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. We summarized CRC screening rates as incidence per 1000 population and used Poisson regression to test for overall and mode-specific CRC trends. We also analyzed rates of follow-up colonoscopy within 6-months after a positive stool-based screening result. While no significant differences over time were observed in overall CRC screening incidence rates among those due for screening, we observed a statistically significant increase in mt-sDNA test and statistically significant decreases in screening colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT test completion rates; differences in screening overall and by modality were observed by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The diagnostic colonoscopy follow-up rate within six months after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher following mt-sDNA (84.9%) compared to FIT/FOBT (42.6%). In this retrospective, population-based study, overall CRC screening incidence rates remained stable from 2016 to 2018, while test-specific rates for mt-sDNA significantly increased and decreased for colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT. Adherence with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher among patients who underwent mt-sDNA screening compared to FIT/FOBT. 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7516167/ /pubmed/32995145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101202 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Finney Rutten, Lila J.
Jacobson, Debra J.
Jenkins, Gregory D.
Fan, Chun
Weiser, Emily
Parks, Philip
Doroshenk, Mary
Limburg, Paul J.
St. Sauver, Jennifer L.
Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title_full Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title_fullStr Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title_short Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality
title_sort colorectal cancer screening completion: an examination of differences by screening modality
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32995145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101202
work_keys_str_mv AT finneyruttenlilaj colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT jacobsondebraj colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT jenkinsgregoryd colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT fanchun colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT weiseremily colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT parksphilip colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT doroshenkmary colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT limburgpaulj colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality
AT stsauverjenniferl colorectalcancerscreeningcompletionanexaminationofdifferencesbyscreeningmodality