Cargando…

Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity

BACKGROUND: Extreme heat events are increasing in frequency, severity, and duration. It is well known that heat stress can have a negative impact on occupational health and productivity, particularly during physical work. However, there are no up-to-date reviews on how vulnerability to heat changes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Josh, Hodder, Simon G., Lloyd, Alex B., Havenith, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.541483
_version_ 1783586970099777536
author Foster, Josh
Hodder, Simon G.
Lloyd, Alex B.
Havenith, George
author_facet Foster, Josh
Hodder, Simon G.
Lloyd, Alex B.
Havenith, George
author_sort Foster, Josh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extreme heat events are increasing in frequency, severity, and duration. It is well known that heat stress can have a negative impact on occupational health and productivity, particularly during physical work. However, there are no up-to-date reviews on how vulnerability to heat changes as a function of individual characteristics in relation to the risk of hyperthermia and work capacity loss. The objective of this narrative review is to examine the role of individual characteristics on the human heat stress response, specifically in relation to hyperthermia risk and productivity loss in hot workplaces. Finally, we aim to generate practical guidance for industrial hygienists considering our findings. Factors included in the analysis were body mass, body surface area to mass ratio, body fat, aerobic fitness and training, heat adaptation, aging, sex, and chronic health conditions. FINDINGS: We found the relevance of any factor to be dynamic, based on the work-type (fixed pace or relative to fitness level), work intensity (low, moderate, or heavy work), climate type (humidity, clothing vapor resistance), and variable of interest (risk of hyperthermia or likelihood of productivity loss). Heat adaptation, high aerobic fitness, and having a large body mass are the most protective factors during heat exposure. Primary detrimental factors include low fitness, low body mass, and lack of heat adaptation. Aging beyond 50 years, being female, and diabetes are less impactful negative factors, since their independent effect is quite small in well matched participants. Skin surface area to mass ratio, body composition, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease are not strong independent predictors of the heat stress response. CONCLUSION: Understanding how individual factors impact responses to heat stress is necessary for the prediction of heat wave impacts on occupational health and work capacity. The recommendations provided in this report could be utilized to help curtail hyperthermia risk and productivity losses induced by heat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7516259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75162592020-10-02 Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity Foster, Josh Hodder, Simon G. Lloyd, Alex B. Havenith, George Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: Extreme heat events are increasing in frequency, severity, and duration. It is well known that heat stress can have a negative impact on occupational health and productivity, particularly during physical work. However, there are no up-to-date reviews on how vulnerability to heat changes as a function of individual characteristics in relation to the risk of hyperthermia and work capacity loss. The objective of this narrative review is to examine the role of individual characteristics on the human heat stress response, specifically in relation to hyperthermia risk and productivity loss in hot workplaces. Finally, we aim to generate practical guidance for industrial hygienists considering our findings. Factors included in the analysis were body mass, body surface area to mass ratio, body fat, aerobic fitness and training, heat adaptation, aging, sex, and chronic health conditions. FINDINGS: We found the relevance of any factor to be dynamic, based on the work-type (fixed pace or relative to fitness level), work intensity (low, moderate, or heavy work), climate type (humidity, clothing vapor resistance), and variable of interest (risk of hyperthermia or likelihood of productivity loss). Heat adaptation, high aerobic fitness, and having a large body mass are the most protective factors during heat exposure. Primary detrimental factors include low fitness, low body mass, and lack of heat adaptation. Aging beyond 50 years, being female, and diabetes are less impactful negative factors, since their independent effect is quite small in well matched participants. Skin surface area to mass ratio, body composition, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease are not strong independent predictors of the heat stress response. CONCLUSION: Understanding how individual factors impact responses to heat stress is necessary for the prediction of heat wave impacts on occupational health and work capacity. The recommendations provided in this report could be utilized to help curtail hyperthermia risk and productivity losses induced by heat. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7516259/ /pubmed/33013476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.541483 Text en Copyright © 2020 Foster, Hodder, Lloyd and Havenith. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Foster, Josh
Hodder, Simon G.
Lloyd, Alex B.
Havenith, George
Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title_full Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title_fullStr Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title_full_unstemmed Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title_short Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity
title_sort individual responses to heat stress: implications for hyperthermia and physical work capacity
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.541483
work_keys_str_mv AT fosterjosh individualresponsestoheatstressimplicationsforhyperthermiaandphysicalworkcapacity
AT hoddersimong individualresponsestoheatstressimplicationsforhyperthermiaandphysicalworkcapacity
AT lloydalexb individualresponsestoheatstressimplicationsforhyperthermiaandphysicalworkcapacity
AT havenithgeorge individualresponsestoheatstressimplicationsforhyperthermiaandphysicalworkcapacity