Cargando…
Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001 |
_version_ | 1783586992764747776 |
---|---|
author | Gill, Richard David |
author_facet | Gill, Richard David |
author_sort | Gill, Richard David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement settings. If the experimenter computes correlations between measurement outcomes of particle pairs for which both particles are detected, he or she is actually looking at a subsample of particle pairs, determined by interaction involving both measurement settings and the hidden variables carried in the particles. We correct a mistake in Pearle’s formulas (a normalization error) and more importantly show that the model is simpler than first appears. We illustrate with visualizations of the model and with a small simulation experiment, with code in the statistical programming language R included in the paper. Open problems are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7516402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75164022020-11-09 Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited Gill, Richard David Entropy (Basel) Discussion Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement settings. If the experimenter computes correlations between measurement outcomes of particle pairs for which both particles are detected, he or she is actually looking at a subsample of particle pairs, determined by interaction involving both measurement settings and the hidden variables carried in the particles. We correct a mistake in Pearle’s formulas (a normalization error) and more importantly show that the model is simpler than first appears. We illustrate with visualizations of the model and with a small simulation experiment, with code in the statistical programming language R included in the paper. Open problems are discussed. MDPI 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7516402/ /pubmed/33285776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Discussion Gill, Richard David Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title | Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title_full | Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title_fullStr | Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title_short | Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited |
title_sort | pearle’s hidden-variable model revisited |
topic | Discussion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillricharddavid pearleshiddenvariablemodelrevisited |