Cargando…

Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited

Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gill, Richard David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001
_version_ 1783586992764747776
author Gill, Richard David
author_facet Gill, Richard David
author_sort Gill, Richard David
collection PubMed
description Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement settings. If the experimenter computes correlations between measurement outcomes of particle pairs for which both particles are detected, he or she is actually looking at a subsample of particle pairs, determined by interaction involving both measurement settings and the hidden variables carried in the particles. We correct a mistake in Pearle’s formulas (a normalization error) and more importantly show that the model is simpler than first appears. We illustrate with visualizations of the model and with a small simulation experiment, with code in the statistical programming language R included in the paper. Open problems are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7516402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75164022020-11-09 Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited Gill, Richard David Entropy (Basel) Discussion Pearle (1970) gave an example of a local hidden variables model which exactly reproduced the singlet correlations of quantum theory, through the device of data-rejection: particles can fail to be detected in a way which depends on the hidden variables carried by the particles and on the measurement settings. If the experimenter computes correlations between measurement outcomes of particle pairs for which both particles are detected, he or she is actually looking at a subsample of particle pairs, determined by interaction involving both measurement settings and the hidden variables carried in the particles. We correct a mistake in Pearle’s formulas (a normalization error) and more importantly show that the model is simpler than first appears. We illustrate with visualizations of the model and with a small simulation experiment, with code in the statistical programming language R included in the paper. Open problems are discussed. MDPI 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7516402/ /pubmed/33285776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Discussion
Gill, Richard David
Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title_full Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title_fullStr Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title_short Pearle’s Hidden-Variable Model Revisited
title_sort pearle’s hidden-variable model revisited
topic Discussion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010001
work_keys_str_mv AT gillricharddavid pearleshiddenvariablemodelrevisited