Cargando…
Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers
In this paper, we obtain upper bounds on the minimum distance for turbo codes using fourth degree permutation polynomial (4-PP) interleavers of a specific interleaver length and classical turbo codes of nominal 1/3 coding rate, with two recursive systematic convolutional component codes with generat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010078 |
_version_ | 1783587018358390784 |
---|---|
author | Trifina, Lucian Tarniceriu, Daniela Ryu, Jonghoon Rotopanescu, Ana-Mirela |
author_facet | Trifina, Lucian Tarniceriu, Daniela Ryu, Jonghoon Rotopanescu, Ana-Mirela |
author_sort | Trifina, Lucian |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we obtain upper bounds on the minimum distance for turbo codes using fourth degree permutation polynomial (4-PP) interleavers of a specific interleaver length and classical turbo codes of nominal 1/3 coding rate, with two recursive systematic convolutional component codes with generator matrix [Formula: see text]. The interleaver lengths are of the form [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is a product of different prime numbers greater than three. Some coefficient restrictions are applied when for a prime [Formula: see text] , condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled. Two upper bounds are obtained for different classes of 4-PP coefficients. For a 4-PP [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , the upper bound of 28 is obtained when the coefficient [Formula: see text] of the equivalent 4-permutation polynomials (PPs) fulfills [Formula: see text] or when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , for any values of the other coefficients. The upper bound of 36 is obtained when the coefficient [Formula: see text] of the equivalent 4-PPs fulfills [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , for any values of the other coefficients. Thus, the task of finding out good 4-PP interleavers of the previous mentioned lengths is highly facilitated by this result because of the small range required for coefficients [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. It was also proven, by means of nonlinearity degree, that for the considered inteleaver lengths, cubic PPs and quadratic PPs with optimum minimum distances lead to better error rate performances compared to 4-PPs with optimum minimum distances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7516510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75165102020-11-09 Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers Trifina, Lucian Tarniceriu, Daniela Ryu, Jonghoon Rotopanescu, Ana-Mirela Entropy (Basel) Article In this paper, we obtain upper bounds on the minimum distance for turbo codes using fourth degree permutation polynomial (4-PP) interleavers of a specific interleaver length and classical turbo codes of nominal 1/3 coding rate, with two recursive systematic convolutional component codes with generator matrix [Formula: see text]. The interleaver lengths are of the form [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is a product of different prime numbers greater than three. Some coefficient restrictions are applied when for a prime [Formula: see text] , condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled. Two upper bounds are obtained for different classes of 4-PP coefficients. For a 4-PP [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , the upper bound of 28 is obtained when the coefficient [Formula: see text] of the equivalent 4-permutation polynomials (PPs) fulfills [Formula: see text] or when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , for any values of the other coefficients. The upper bound of 36 is obtained when the coefficient [Formula: see text] of the equivalent 4-PPs fulfills [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , for any values of the other coefficients. Thus, the task of finding out good 4-PP interleavers of the previous mentioned lengths is highly facilitated by this result because of the small range required for coefficients [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. It was also proven, by means of nonlinearity degree, that for the considered inteleaver lengths, cubic PPs and quadratic PPs with optimum minimum distances lead to better error rate performances compared to 4-PPs with optimum minimum distances. MDPI 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7516510/ /pubmed/33285853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010078 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Trifina, Lucian Tarniceriu, Daniela Ryu, Jonghoon Rotopanescu, Ana-Mirela Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title | Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title_full | Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title_fullStr | Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title_full_unstemmed | Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title_short | Lengths for Which Fourth Degree PP Interleavers Lead to Weaker Performances Compared to Quadratic and Cubic PP Interleavers |
title_sort | lengths for which fourth degree pp interleavers lead to weaker performances compared to quadratic and cubic pp interleavers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22010078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trifinalucian lengthsforwhichfourthdegreeppinterleaversleadtoweakerperformancescomparedtoquadraticandcubicppinterleavers AT tarniceriudaniela lengthsforwhichfourthdegreeppinterleaversleadtoweakerperformancescomparedtoquadraticandcubicppinterleavers AT ryujonghoon lengthsforwhichfourthdegreeppinterleaversleadtoweakerperformancescomparedtoquadraticandcubicppinterleavers AT rotopanescuanamirela lengthsforwhichfourthdegreeppinterleaversleadtoweakerperformancescomparedtoquadraticandcubicppinterleavers |