Cargando…

Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics

Maxwell’s Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shenker, Orly, Hemmo, Meir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22030269
_version_ 1783587066752270336
author Shenker, Orly
Hemmo, Meir
author_facet Shenker, Orly
Hemmo, Meir
author_sort Shenker, Orly
collection PubMed
description Maxwell’s Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of temporal directionality as well. Various attempts to “exorcise” the Demon, by proving that it is impossible for one reason or another, have been made throughout the years, but none of them were successful. We have shown (in a number of publications) by a general state-space argument that Maxwell’s Demon is compatible with classical mechanics, and that the most recent solutions, based on Landauer’s thesis, are not general. In this paper we demonstrate that Maxwell’s Demon is also compatible with quantum mechanics. We do so by analyzing a particular (but highly idealized) experimental setup and proving that it violates the Second Law. Our discussion is in the framework of standard quantum mechanics; we give two separate arguments in the framework of quantum mechanics with and without the projection postulate. We address in our analysis the connection between measurement and erasure interactions and we show how these notions are applicable in the microscopic quantum mechanical structure. We discuss what might be the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical notion of “macrostates”, thus explaining why our Quantum Demon setup works not only at the micro level but also at the macro level, properly understood. One implication of our analysis is that the Second Law cannot provide a universal lawlike basis for an account of the arrow of time; this account has to be sought elsewhere.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7516722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75167222020-11-09 Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics Shenker, Orly Hemmo, Meir Entropy (Basel) Article Maxwell’s Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of temporal directionality as well. Various attempts to “exorcise” the Demon, by proving that it is impossible for one reason or another, have been made throughout the years, but none of them were successful. We have shown (in a number of publications) by a general state-space argument that Maxwell’s Demon is compatible with classical mechanics, and that the most recent solutions, based on Landauer’s thesis, are not general. In this paper we demonstrate that Maxwell’s Demon is also compatible with quantum mechanics. We do so by analyzing a particular (but highly idealized) experimental setup and proving that it violates the Second Law. Our discussion is in the framework of standard quantum mechanics; we give two separate arguments in the framework of quantum mechanics with and without the projection postulate. We address in our analysis the connection between measurement and erasure interactions and we show how these notions are applicable in the microscopic quantum mechanical structure. We discuss what might be the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical notion of “macrostates”, thus explaining why our Quantum Demon setup works not only at the micro level but also at the macro level, properly understood. One implication of our analysis is that the Second Law cannot provide a universal lawlike basis for an account of the arrow of time; this account has to be sought elsewhere. MDPI 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7516722/ /pubmed/33286043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22030269 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shenker, Orly
Hemmo, Meir
Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title_full Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title_fullStr Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title_short Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics
title_sort maxwell’s demon in quantum mechanics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7516722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22030269
work_keys_str_mv AT shenkerorly maxwellsdemoninquantummechanics
AT hemmomeir maxwellsdemoninquantummechanics