Cargando…

Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping

In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gültekin, Yunus Can, Fehenberger, Tobias, Alvarado, Alex, Willems, Frans M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581
_version_ 1783587149609697280
author Gültekin, Yunus Can
Fehenberger, Tobias
Alvarado, Alex
Willems, Frans M. J.
author_facet Gültekin, Yunus Can
Fehenberger, Tobias
Alvarado, Alex
Willems, Frans M. J.
author_sort Gültekin, Yunus Can
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacity-achieving distribution. However, as the blocklength decreases, the resulting rate loss diminishes the efficiency of CCDM. We claim that for such short blocklengths over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the objective of shaping should be reformulated as obtaining the most energy-efficient signal space for a given rate (rather than matching distributions). In light of this interpretation, multiset-partition DM (MPDM) and SpSh are reviewed as energy-efficient shaping techniques. Numerical results show that both have smaller rate losses than CCDM. SpSh—whose sole objective is to maximize the energy efficiency—is shown to have the minimum rate loss amongst all, which is particularly apparent for ultra short blocklengths. We provide simulation results of the end-to-end decoding performance showing that up to 1 dB improvement in power efficiency over uniform signaling can be obtained with MPDM and SpSh at blocklengths around 200. Finally, we present a discussion on the complexity of these algorithms from the perspectives of latency, storage and computations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7517088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75170882020-11-09 Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping Gültekin, Yunus Can Fehenberger, Tobias Alvarado, Alex Willems, Frans M. J. Entropy (Basel) Article In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacity-achieving distribution. However, as the blocklength decreases, the resulting rate loss diminishes the efficiency of CCDM. We claim that for such short blocklengths over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the objective of shaping should be reformulated as obtaining the most energy-efficient signal space for a given rate (rather than matching distributions). In light of this interpretation, multiset-partition DM (MPDM) and SpSh are reviewed as energy-efficient shaping techniques. Numerical results show that both have smaller rate losses than CCDM. SpSh—whose sole objective is to maximize the energy efficiency—is shown to have the minimum rate loss amongst all, which is particularly apparent for ultra short blocklengths. We provide simulation results of the end-to-end decoding performance showing that up to 1 dB improvement in power efficiency over uniform signaling can be obtained with MPDM and SpSh at blocklengths around 200. Finally, we present a discussion on the complexity of these algorithms from the perspectives of latency, storage and computations. MDPI 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7517088/ /pubmed/33286353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gültekin, Yunus Can
Fehenberger, Tobias
Alvarado, Alex
Willems, Frans M. J.
Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title_full Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title_fullStr Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title_full_unstemmed Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title_short Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
title_sort probabilistic shaping for finite blocklengths: distribution matching and sphere shaping
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581
work_keys_str_mv AT gultekinyunuscan probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping
AT fehenbergertobias probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping
AT alvaradoalex probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping
AT willemsfransmj probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping