Cargando…
Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping
In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581 |
_version_ | 1783587149609697280 |
---|---|
author | Gültekin, Yunus Can Fehenberger, Tobias Alvarado, Alex Willems, Frans M. J. |
author_facet | Gültekin, Yunus Can Fehenberger, Tobias Alvarado, Alex Willems, Frans M. J. |
author_sort | Gültekin, Yunus Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacity-achieving distribution. However, as the blocklength decreases, the resulting rate loss diminishes the efficiency of CCDM. We claim that for such short blocklengths over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the objective of shaping should be reformulated as obtaining the most energy-efficient signal space for a given rate (rather than matching distributions). In light of this interpretation, multiset-partition DM (MPDM) and SpSh are reviewed as energy-efficient shaping techniques. Numerical results show that both have smaller rate losses than CCDM. SpSh—whose sole objective is to maximize the energy efficiency—is shown to have the minimum rate loss amongst all, which is particularly apparent for ultra short blocklengths. We provide simulation results of the end-to-end decoding performance showing that up to 1 dB improvement in power efficiency over uniform signaling can be obtained with MPDM and SpSh at blocklengths around 200. Finally, we present a discussion on the complexity of these algorithms from the perspectives of latency, storage and computations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7517088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75170882020-11-09 Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping Gültekin, Yunus Can Fehenberger, Tobias Alvarado, Alex Willems, Frans M. J. Entropy (Basel) Article In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacity-achieving distribution. However, as the blocklength decreases, the resulting rate loss diminishes the efficiency of CCDM. We claim that for such short blocklengths over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the objective of shaping should be reformulated as obtaining the most energy-efficient signal space for a given rate (rather than matching distributions). In light of this interpretation, multiset-partition DM (MPDM) and SpSh are reviewed as energy-efficient shaping techniques. Numerical results show that both have smaller rate losses than CCDM. SpSh—whose sole objective is to maximize the energy efficiency—is shown to have the minimum rate loss amongst all, which is particularly apparent for ultra short blocklengths. We provide simulation results of the end-to-end decoding performance showing that up to 1 dB improvement in power efficiency over uniform signaling can be obtained with MPDM and SpSh at blocklengths around 200. Finally, we present a discussion on the complexity of these algorithms from the perspectives of latency, storage and computations. MDPI 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7517088/ /pubmed/33286353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gültekin, Yunus Can Fehenberger, Tobias Alvarado, Alex Willems, Frans M. J. Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title | Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title_full | Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title_fullStr | Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title_full_unstemmed | Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title_short | Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping |
title_sort | probabilistic shaping for finite blocklengths: distribution matching and sphere shaping |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gultekinyunuscan probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping AT fehenbergertobias probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping AT alvaradoalex probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping AT willemsfransmj probabilisticshapingforfiniteblocklengthsdistributionmatchingandsphereshaping |