Cargando…
Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670 |
_version_ | 1783587176252964864 |
---|---|
author | Jiménez-García, Jorge Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C. García, María Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila Martín-Montero, Adrián Álvarez, Daniel del Campo, Félix Gozal, David Hornero, Roberto |
author_facet | Jiménez-García, Jorge Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C. García, María Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila Martín-Montero, Adrián Álvarez, Daniel del Campo, Félix Gozal, David Hornero, Roberto |
author_sort | Jiménez-García, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the complementarity of airflow (AF) and oximetry (SpO(2)) signals to automatically detect pediatric OSA. Additionally, a secondary goal was to assess the utility of a multiclass AdaBoost classifier to predict OSA severity in children. We extracted the same features from AF and SpO(2) signals from 974 pediatric subjects. We also obtained the 3% Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) as a common clinically used variable. Then, feature selection was conducted using the Fast Correlation-Based Filter method and AdaBoost classifiers were evaluated. Models combining ODI 3% and AF features outperformed the diagnostic performance of each signal alone, reaching 0.39 Cohens’s kappa in the four-class classification task. OSA vs. No OSA accuracies reached 81.28%, 82.05% and 90.26% in the apnea–hypopnea index cutoffs 1, 5 and 10 events/h, respectively. The most relevant information from SpO(2) was redundant with ODI 3%, and AF was complementary to them. Thus, the joint analysis of AF and SpO(2) enhanced the diagnostic performance of each signal alone using AdaBoost, thereby enabling a potential screening alternative for OSA in children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7517204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75172042020-11-09 Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost Jiménez-García, Jorge Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C. García, María Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila Martín-Montero, Adrián Álvarez, Daniel del Campo, Félix Gozal, David Hornero, Roberto Entropy (Basel) Article The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the complementarity of airflow (AF) and oximetry (SpO(2)) signals to automatically detect pediatric OSA. Additionally, a secondary goal was to assess the utility of a multiclass AdaBoost classifier to predict OSA severity in children. We extracted the same features from AF and SpO(2) signals from 974 pediatric subjects. We also obtained the 3% Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) as a common clinically used variable. Then, feature selection was conducted using the Fast Correlation-Based Filter method and AdaBoost classifiers were evaluated. Models combining ODI 3% and AF features outperformed the diagnostic performance of each signal alone, reaching 0.39 Cohens’s kappa in the four-class classification task. OSA vs. No OSA accuracies reached 81.28%, 82.05% and 90.26% in the apnea–hypopnea index cutoffs 1, 5 and 10 events/h, respectively. The most relevant information from SpO(2) was redundant with ODI 3%, and AF was complementary to them. Thus, the joint analysis of AF and SpO(2) enhanced the diagnostic performance of each signal alone using AdaBoost, thereby enabling a potential screening alternative for OSA in children. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7517204/ /pubmed/33286442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jiménez-García, Jorge Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C. García, María Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila Martín-Montero, Adrián Álvarez, Daniel del Campo, Félix Gozal, David Hornero, Roberto Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title | Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title_full | Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title_short | Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost |
title_sort | assessment of airflow and oximetry signals to detect pediatric sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome using adaboost |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jimenezgarciajorge assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT gutierreztobalgonzaloc assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT garciamaria assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT kheirandishgozalleila assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT martinmonteroadrian assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT alvarezdaniel assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT delcampofelix assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT gozaldavid assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost AT horneroroberto assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost |