Cargando…

Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost

The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiménez-García, Jorge, Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C., García, María, Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila, Martín-Montero, Adrián, Álvarez, Daniel, del Campo, Félix, Gozal, David, Hornero, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670
_version_ 1783587176252964864
author Jiménez-García, Jorge
Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C.
García, María
Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila
Martín-Montero, Adrián
Álvarez, Daniel
del Campo, Félix
Gozal, David
Hornero, Roberto
author_facet Jiménez-García, Jorge
Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C.
García, María
Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila
Martín-Montero, Adrián
Álvarez, Daniel
del Campo, Félix
Gozal, David
Hornero, Roberto
author_sort Jiménez-García, Jorge
collection PubMed
description The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the complementarity of airflow (AF) and oximetry (SpO(2)) signals to automatically detect pediatric OSA. Additionally, a secondary goal was to assess the utility of a multiclass AdaBoost classifier to predict OSA severity in children. We extracted the same features from AF and SpO(2) signals from 974 pediatric subjects. We also obtained the 3% Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) as a common clinically used variable. Then, feature selection was conducted using the Fast Correlation-Based Filter method and AdaBoost classifiers were evaluated. Models combining ODI 3% and AF features outperformed the diagnostic performance of each signal alone, reaching 0.39 Cohens’s kappa in the four-class classification task. OSA vs. No OSA accuracies reached 81.28%, 82.05% and 90.26% in the apnea–hypopnea index cutoffs 1, 5 and 10 events/h, respectively. The most relevant information from SpO(2) was redundant with ODI 3%, and AF was complementary to them. Thus, the joint analysis of AF and SpO(2) enhanced the diagnostic performance of each signal alone using AdaBoost, thereby enabling a potential screening alternative for OSA in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7517204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75172042020-11-09 Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost Jiménez-García, Jorge Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C. García, María Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila Martín-Montero, Adrián Álvarez, Daniel del Campo, Félix Gozal, David Hornero, Roberto Entropy (Basel) Article The reference standard to diagnose pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is an overnight polysomnographic evaluation. When polysomnography is either unavailable or has limited availability, OSA screening may comprise the automatic analysis of a minimum number of signals. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the complementarity of airflow (AF) and oximetry (SpO(2)) signals to automatically detect pediatric OSA. Additionally, a secondary goal was to assess the utility of a multiclass AdaBoost classifier to predict OSA severity in children. We extracted the same features from AF and SpO(2) signals from 974 pediatric subjects. We also obtained the 3% Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) as a common clinically used variable. Then, feature selection was conducted using the Fast Correlation-Based Filter method and AdaBoost classifiers were evaluated. Models combining ODI 3% and AF features outperformed the diagnostic performance of each signal alone, reaching 0.39 Cohens’s kappa in the four-class classification task. OSA vs. No OSA accuracies reached 81.28%, 82.05% and 90.26% in the apnea–hypopnea index cutoffs 1, 5 and 10 events/h, respectively. The most relevant information from SpO(2) was redundant with ODI 3%, and AF was complementary to them. Thus, the joint analysis of AF and SpO(2) enhanced the diagnostic performance of each signal alone using AdaBoost, thereby enabling a potential screening alternative for OSA in children. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7517204/ /pubmed/33286442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jiménez-García, Jorge
Gutiérrez-Tobal, Gonzalo C.
García, María
Kheirandish-Gozal, Leila
Martín-Montero, Adrián
Álvarez, Daniel
del Campo, Félix
Gozal, David
Hornero, Roberto
Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title_full Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title_fullStr Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title_short Assessment of Airflow and Oximetry Signals to Detect Pediatric Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Using AdaBoost
title_sort assessment of airflow and oximetry signals to detect pediatric sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome using adaboost
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33286442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22060670
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezgarciajorge assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT gutierreztobalgonzaloc assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT garciamaria assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT kheirandishgozalleila assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT martinmonteroadrian assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT alvarezdaniel assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT delcampofelix assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT gozaldavid assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost
AT horneroroberto assessmentofairflowandoximetrysignalstodetectpediatricsleepapneahypopneasyndromeusingadaboost