Cargando…

Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLeod, Melissa, Sandiford, Peter, Kvizhinadze, Giorgi, Bartholomew, Karen, Crengle, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32973060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145
_version_ 1783587252524285952
author McLeod, Melissa
Sandiford, Peter
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Bartholomew, Karen
Crengle, Sue
author_facet McLeod, Melissa
Sandiford, Peter
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Bartholomew, Karen
Crengle, Sue
author_sort McLeod, Melissa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years. DESIGN: A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Population aged 55–74 years in 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured. RESULTS: LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival. CONCLUSION: A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7517554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75175542020-10-05 Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis McLeod, Melissa Sandiford, Peter Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Bartholomew, Karen Crengle, Sue BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years. DESIGN: A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Population aged 55–74 years in 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured. RESULTS: LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival. CONCLUSION: A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7517554/ /pubmed/32973060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
McLeod, Melissa
Sandiford, Peter
Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
Bartholomew, Karen
Crengle, Sue
Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort impact of low-dose ct screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in new zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32973060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleodmelissa impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT sandifordpeter impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kvizhinadzegiorgi impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT bartholomewkaren impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT crenglesue impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis