Cargando…
Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32973060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145 |
_version_ | 1783587252524285952 |
---|---|
author | McLeod, Melissa Sandiford, Peter Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Bartholomew, Karen Crengle, Sue |
author_facet | McLeod, Melissa Sandiford, Peter Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Bartholomew, Karen Crengle, Sue |
author_sort | McLeod, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years. DESIGN: A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Population aged 55–74 years in 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured. RESULTS: LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival. CONCLUSION: A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7517554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75175542020-10-05 Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis McLeod, Melissa Sandiford, Peter Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Bartholomew, Karen Crengle, Sue BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years. DESIGN: A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Population aged 55–74 years in 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured. RESULTS: LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival. CONCLUSION: A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7517554/ /pubmed/32973060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health McLeod, Melissa Sandiford, Peter Kvizhinadze, Giorgi Bartholomew, Karen Crengle, Sue Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | impact of low-dose ct screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in new zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32973060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcleodmelissa impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis AT sandifordpeter impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis AT kvizhinadzegiorgi impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis AT bartholomewkaren impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis AT crenglesue impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis |