Cargando…

Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review

Introduction: The most common causative organism in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is Gram-positive bacteria that are increasingly drug resistant. In these cases the use of linezolid may be warranted. However, there are conflicting reports regarding its role in antibiotic treatment of PJIs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theil, Christoph, Schmidt-Braekling, Tom, Gosheger, Georg, Schwarze, Jan, Dieckmann, Ralf, Schneider, Kristian Nikolaus, Möllenbeck, Burkhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983842
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-7-2020
_version_ 1783587269069766656
author Theil, Christoph
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Dieckmann, Ralf
Schneider, Kristian Nikolaus
Möllenbeck, Burkhard
author_facet Theil, Christoph
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Dieckmann, Ralf
Schneider, Kristian Nikolaus
Möllenbeck, Burkhard
author_sort Theil, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The most common causative organism in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is Gram-positive bacteria that are increasingly drug resistant. In these cases the use of linezolid may be warranted. However, there are conflicting reports regarding its role in antibiotic treatment of PJIs. The aim of this review is to gather and analyze clinical results and treatment details on linezolid in patients with PJIs. Methods: In August 2019, a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE (Pubmed and Ovid) and Cochrane Library was performed. A total of 504 records were screened, and a total of 16 studies including 372 patients treated with linezolid for a PJI were included in this review based on the PRISMA criteria and after quality analysis using the MINOR score and Newcastle–Ottawa scale, as well as assessing level of evidence. Pooling analysis as well as descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Based on the results from the studies included, infection control was achieved in 80 % (range 30 %–100 %) of patients after a mean follow-up period of 25 (range 2–66) months. The mean duration of treatment was 58 d intravenous and orally at a median dose of 600 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) (range 400–900 b.i.d.). A combination therapy with rifampicin was used in 53 % of patients. MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infections were present in 29 % and resistant CoNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) in 46 %. Adverse effects occurred in 33 % of cases, mostly anemia, thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal complaints leading to treatment discontinuation in 9 %. However, great heterogeneity was found with respect to surgical treatment, diagnosis of infection and indication for linezolid. Discussion: Linezolid is an appropriate option for treatment of resistant Gram-positive organisms in PJIs. Most commonly 600 mg b.i.d. is used, and a combination with rifampicin appears feasible although one must consider individual increases in doses in these cases. However, adverse effects are common and there are limited data for long-term use and optimal antibiotic combinations or individual doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7517662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75176622020-09-25 Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review Theil, Christoph Schmidt-Braekling, Tom Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Dieckmann, Ralf Schneider, Kristian Nikolaus Möllenbeck, Burkhard J Bone Jt Infect Review Introduction: The most common causative organism in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is Gram-positive bacteria that are increasingly drug resistant. In these cases the use of linezolid may be warranted. However, there are conflicting reports regarding its role in antibiotic treatment of PJIs. The aim of this review is to gather and analyze clinical results and treatment details on linezolid in patients with PJIs. Methods: In August 2019, a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE (Pubmed and Ovid) and Cochrane Library was performed. A total of 504 records were screened, and a total of 16 studies including 372 patients treated with linezolid for a PJI were included in this review based on the PRISMA criteria and after quality analysis using the MINOR score and Newcastle–Ottawa scale, as well as assessing level of evidence. Pooling analysis as well as descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Based on the results from the studies included, infection control was achieved in 80 % (range 30 %–100 %) of patients after a mean follow-up period of 25 (range 2–66) months. The mean duration of treatment was 58 d intravenous and orally at a median dose of 600 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) (range 400–900 b.i.d.). A combination therapy with rifampicin was used in 53 % of patients. MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infections were present in 29 % and resistant CoNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) in 46 %. Adverse effects occurred in 33 % of cases, mostly anemia, thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal complaints leading to treatment discontinuation in 9 %. However, great heterogeneity was found with respect to surgical treatment, diagnosis of infection and indication for linezolid. Discussion: Linezolid is an appropriate option for treatment of resistant Gram-positive organisms in PJIs. Most commonly 600 mg b.i.d. is used, and a combination with rifampicin appears feasible although one must consider individual increases in doses in these cases. However, adverse effects are common and there are limited data for long-term use and optimal antibiotic combinations or individual doses. Copernicus GmbH 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7517662/ /pubmed/32983842 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-7-2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Christoph Theil et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Theil, Christoph
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Dieckmann, Ralf
Schneider, Kristian Nikolaus
Möllenbeck, Burkhard
Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title_full Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title_short Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
title_sort clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections – a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983842
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-7-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT theilchristoph clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT schmidtbraeklingtom clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT goshegergeorg clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT schwarzejan clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT dieckmannralf clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT schneiderkristiannikolaus clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT mollenbeckburkhard clinicaluseoflinezolidinperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreview