Cargando…

Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities

Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying pressure ulcers is essential, as overdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary and prolonged antibiotic therapy, while failure to diagnose prevents successful treatment. Histopathological examination of bone biopsy specimens is the diagnostic gold stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chicco, Maria, Singh, Prashant, Beitverda, Younatan, Williams, Gillian, Hirji, Hassan, Rao, Guduru Gopal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983845
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-21-2020
_version_ 1783587270013485056
author Chicco, Maria
Singh, Prashant
Beitverda, Younatan
Williams, Gillian
Hirji, Hassan
Rao, Guduru Gopal
author_facet Chicco, Maria
Singh, Prashant
Beitverda, Younatan
Williams, Gillian
Hirji, Hassan
Rao, Guduru Gopal
author_sort Chicco, Maria
collection PubMed
description Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying pressure ulcers is essential, as overdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary and prolonged antibiotic therapy, while failure to diagnose prevents successful treatment. Histopathological examination of bone biopsy specimens is the diagnostic gold standard. Bone biopsy can be an invasive procedure, and, for this reason, other diagnostic modalities are commonly used. However, their accuracy is questioned in literature. This systematic review aims to assess accuracy of various modalities (clinical, microbiological and radiological) for the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers as compared to the gold standard. A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2019 using the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System – MEDLARS – Online) and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The search terms were “decubitus ulcer”, “pressure ulcer”, “pressure sore”, “bedsore” and “osteomyelitis”. The inclusion criteria were original full-text articles in English comparing the results of bone histology with those of other diagnostic modalities in adult patients with pelvic pressure ulcers. Six articles were included in the systematic review. Clinical diagnosis was found to be neither specific nor sensitive. Microbiological examination, and in particular cultures of bone biopsy specimens, displayed high sensitivity but low specificity, likely reflecting contamination. Radiological imaging in the form of X-ray and CT (computed tomography) scans displayed high specificity but low sensitivity. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), bone scanning and indium-labelled scintigraphy displayed high sensitivity but low specificity. Our systematic review did not find any diagnostic method (clinical, microbiological or radiological) to be reliable in the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis associated with pressure ulcers as compared to bone histology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7517666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75176662020-09-25 Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities Chicco, Maria Singh, Prashant Beitverda, Younatan Williams, Gillian Hirji, Hassan Rao, Guduru Gopal J Bone Jt Infect Review Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying pressure ulcers is essential, as overdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary and prolonged antibiotic therapy, while failure to diagnose prevents successful treatment. Histopathological examination of bone biopsy specimens is the diagnostic gold standard. Bone biopsy can be an invasive procedure, and, for this reason, other diagnostic modalities are commonly used. However, their accuracy is questioned in literature. This systematic review aims to assess accuracy of various modalities (clinical, microbiological and radiological) for the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers as compared to the gold standard. A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2019 using the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System – MEDLARS – Online) and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The search terms were “decubitus ulcer”, “pressure ulcer”, “pressure sore”, “bedsore” and “osteomyelitis”. The inclusion criteria were original full-text articles in English comparing the results of bone histology with those of other diagnostic modalities in adult patients with pelvic pressure ulcers. Six articles were included in the systematic review. Clinical diagnosis was found to be neither specific nor sensitive. Microbiological examination, and in particular cultures of bone biopsy specimens, displayed high sensitivity but low specificity, likely reflecting contamination. Radiological imaging in the form of X-ray and CT (computed tomography) scans displayed high specificity but low sensitivity. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), bone scanning and indium-labelled scintigraphy displayed high sensitivity but low specificity. Our systematic review did not find any diagnostic method (clinical, microbiological or radiological) to be reliable in the diagnosis of pelvic osteomyelitis associated with pressure ulcers as compared to bone histology. Copernicus GmbH 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7517666/ /pubmed/32983845 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-21-2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Maria Chicco et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Chicco, Maria
Singh, Prashant
Beitverda, Younatan
Williams, Gillian
Hirji, Hassan
Rao, Guduru Gopal
Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title_full Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title_fullStr Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title_short Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
title_sort diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review comparing bone histology with alternative diagnostic modalities
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983845
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-21-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT chiccomaria diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities
AT singhprashant diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities
AT beitverdayounatan diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities
AT williamsgillian diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities
AT hirjihassan diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities
AT raogudurugopal diagnosingpelvicosteomyelitisinpatientswithpressureulcersasystematicreviewcomparingbonehistologywithalternativediagnosticmodalities