Cargando…
Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is an important pathogen of healthcare- associated diarrhea, however, an increase in the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) outside hospital settings has been reported. The accumulation of antimicrobial resistance in C. difficile can increas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00815-5 |
_version_ | 1783587299989127168 |
---|---|
author | Sholeh, Mohammad Krutova, Marcela Forouzesh, Mehdi Mironov, Sergey Sadeghifard, Nourkhoda Molaeipour, Leila Maleki, Abbas Kouhsari, Ebrahim |
author_facet | Sholeh, Mohammad Krutova, Marcela Forouzesh, Mehdi Mironov, Sergey Sadeghifard, Nourkhoda Molaeipour, Leila Maleki, Abbas Kouhsari, Ebrahim |
author_sort | Sholeh, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is an important pathogen of healthcare- associated diarrhea, however, an increase in the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) outside hospital settings has been reported. The accumulation of antimicrobial resistance in C. difficile can increase the risk of CDI development and/or its spread. The limited number of antimicrobials for the treatment of CDI is matter of some concern. OBJECTIVES: In order to summarize the data on antimicrobial resistance to C. difficile derived from humans, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. METHODS: We searched five bibliographic databases: (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) for studies that focused on antimicrobial susceptibility testing in C. difficile and were published between 1992 and 2019. The weighted pooled resistance (WPR) for each antimicrobial agent was calculated using a random- effects model. RESULTS: A total of 111 studies were included. The WPR for metronidazole and vancomycin was 1.0% (95% CI 0–3%) and 1% (95% CI 0–2%) for the breakpoint > 2 mg/L and 0% (95% CI 0%) for breakpoint ≥32 μg/ml. Rifampin and tigecycline had a WPRs of 37.0% (95% CI 18–58%) and 1% (95% CI 0–3%), respectively. The WPRs for the other antimicrobials were as follows: ciprofloxacin 95% (95% CI 85–100%), moxifloxacin 32% (95% CI 25–40%), clindamycin 59% (95% CI 53–65%), amoxicillin/clavulanate 0% (0–0%), piperacillin/tazobactam 0% (0–0%) and ceftriaxone 47% (95% CI 29–65%). Tetracycline had a WPR 20% (95% CI 14–27%) and meropenem showed 0% (95% CI 0–1%); resistance to fidaxomicin was reported in one isolate (0.08%). CONCLUSION: Resistance to metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam is reported rarely. From the alternative CDI drug treatments, tigecycline had a lower resistance rate than rifampin. The high-risk antimicrobials for CDI development showed a high level of resistance, the highest was seen in the second generation of fluoroquinolones and clindamycin; amoxicillin/clavulanate showed almost no resistance. Tetracycline resistance was present in one fifth of human clinical C. difficile isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7517813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75178132020-09-29 Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sholeh, Mohammad Krutova, Marcela Forouzesh, Mehdi Mironov, Sergey Sadeghifard, Nourkhoda Molaeipour, Leila Maleki, Abbas Kouhsari, Ebrahim Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is an important pathogen of healthcare- associated diarrhea, however, an increase in the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) outside hospital settings has been reported. The accumulation of antimicrobial resistance in C. difficile can increase the risk of CDI development and/or its spread. The limited number of antimicrobials for the treatment of CDI is matter of some concern. OBJECTIVES: In order to summarize the data on antimicrobial resistance to C. difficile derived from humans, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. METHODS: We searched five bibliographic databases: (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) for studies that focused on antimicrobial susceptibility testing in C. difficile and were published between 1992 and 2019. The weighted pooled resistance (WPR) for each antimicrobial agent was calculated using a random- effects model. RESULTS: A total of 111 studies were included. The WPR for metronidazole and vancomycin was 1.0% (95% CI 0–3%) and 1% (95% CI 0–2%) for the breakpoint > 2 mg/L and 0% (95% CI 0%) for breakpoint ≥32 μg/ml. Rifampin and tigecycline had a WPRs of 37.0% (95% CI 18–58%) and 1% (95% CI 0–3%), respectively. The WPRs for the other antimicrobials were as follows: ciprofloxacin 95% (95% CI 85–100%), moxifloxacin 32% (95% CI 25–40%), clindamycin 59% (95% CI 53–65%), amoxicillin/clavulanate 0% (0–0%), piperacillin/tazobactam 0% (0–0%) and ceftriaxone 47% (95% CI 29–65%). Tetracycline had a WPR 20% (95% CI 14–27%) and meropenem showed 0% (95% CI 0–1%); resistance to fidaxomicin was reported in one isolate (0.08%). CONCLUSION: Resistance to metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam is reported rarely. From the alternative CDI drug treatments, tigecycline had a lower resistance rate than rifampin. The high-risk antimicrobials for CDI development showed a high level of resistance, the highest was seen in the second generation of fluoroquinolones and clindamycin; amoxicillin/clavulanate showed almost no resistance. Tetracycline resistance was present in one fifth of human clinical C. difficile isolates. BioMed Central 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7517813/ /pubmed/32977835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00815-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Sholeh, Mohammad Krutova, Marcela Forouzesh, Mehdi Mironov, Sergey Sadeghifard, Nourkhoda Molaeipour, Leila Maleki, Abbas Kouhsari, Ebrahim Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | antimicrobial resistance in clostridioides (clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00815-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sholehmohammad antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krutovamarcela antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT forouzeshmehdi antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mironovsergey antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sadeghifardnourkhoda antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT molaeipourleila antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malekiabbas antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kouhsariebrahim antimicrobialresistanceinclostridioidesclostridiumdifficilederivedfromhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |