Reproducibility of echocardiographic indices of left atrial size in dogs with subclinical myxomatous mitral valve disease

BACKGROUND: Reliability of echocardiographic measurements of left atrial (LA) size, an important marker of disease severity, has not been reported in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD). OBJECTIVES: To define and compare reliability of left atrial dimension/diameter (LAD), LAD indexed to aortic valve diameter (LAD/AoD), left atrium‐to‐aortic root ratio (LA/Ao), left atrial volume acquired from a right parasternal long‐axis (LAV(RPLx)), and left apical view (LAV(LAP)) in dogs with subclinical MMVD. ANIMALS: Nine dogs with subclinical MMVD. METHODS: Prospective reproducibility study. Dogs underwent 12 echocardiographic examinations by 2 operators on the mornings and afternoons of 3 nonconsecutive days within 1 week. Reliability (measurement variability) was quantified using coefficients of variation (CV) and 95% repeatability/reproducibility coefficients (95% RC). A mixed‐model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if time of day, day, and operator were significant sources of variability for each index. RESULTS: Linear measurements (LAD, LAD/AoD, and LA/Ao) exhibited less within‐day, between‐day, and interoperator variability (CVs, 3.9%‐12.5%) than did volume estimate measurements (LAV(RPLx) and LAV(LAP); CVs, 11.8%‐17.9%). Of the linear measurements, LA/Ao exhibited greater variability (CVs, 9.9%‐12.5%) compared to LAD and LAD/AoD (CVs, 3.9%‐4.9%). Operator was a significant (P = .005) source of variability for LA/Ao. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Compared to other linear measurements, LA/Ao was the least reproducible and most dependent on operator. The 95% RC for each LA size index are provided to help identify clinically relevant changes (beyond intraoperator or interoperator variability) during serial echocardiographic examinations of dogs with subclinical MMVD.