Cargando…
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers need reliable evidence for supporting the adoption of new interventions, of which the source of evidence often originates from systematic reviews (SRs). However, little assessment on the rigor of SRs related to osteoarthritis interventions has been conducted. This cr...
Autores principales: | Wu, Irene XY, Wang, Huan, Zhu, Lin, Chen, Yancong, Wong, Charlene HL, Mao, Chen, Chung, Vincent CH |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20959967 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review
por: Wang, Huan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Cancer Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Sun, Xuemei, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study
por: Ho, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
por: Zhong, Claire C. W., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies
por: Wang, Huan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)