Cargando…
Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024426 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435 |
_version_ | 1783587335300972544 |
---|---|
author | Goderis, Geert Colman, Elien Irusta, Lucia Alvarez Van Hecke, Ann Pétré, Benoit Devroey, Dirk Van Deun, Elias Faes, Kristof Charlier, Nathan Verhaeghe, Nick Remmen, Roy Anthierens, Sibyl Sermeus, Walter Macq, Jean |
author_facet | Goderis, Geert Colman, Elien Irusta, Lucia Alvarez Van Hecke, Ann Pétré, Benoit Devroey, Dirk Van Deun, Elias Faes, Kristof Charlier, Nathan Verhaeghe, Nick Remmen, Roy Anthierens, Sibyl Sermeus, Walter Macq, Jean |
author_sort | Goderis, Geert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS: A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS: A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION: The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7518071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75180712020-10-05 Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium Goderis, Geert Colman, Elien Irusta, Lucia Alvarez Van Hecke, Ann Pétré, Benoit Devroey, Dirk Van Deun, Elias Faes, Kristof Charlier, Nathan Verhaeghe, Nick Remmen, Roy Anthierens, Sibyl Sermeus, Walter Macq, Jean Int J Integr Care Research and Theory BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS: A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS: A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION: The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal. Ubiquity Press 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7518071/ /pubmed/33024426 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Goderis, Geert Colman, Elien Irusta, Lucia Alvarez Van Hecke, Ann Pétré, Benoit Devroey, Dirk Van Deun, Elias Faes, Kristof Charlier, Nathan Verhaeghe, Nick Remmen, Roy Anthierens, Sibyl Sermeus, Walter Macq, Jean Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title | Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title_full | Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title_short | Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium |
title_sort | evaluating large-scale integrated care projects: the development of a protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation study in belgium |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024426 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goderisgeert evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT colmanelien evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT irustaluciaalvarez evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT vanheckeann evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT petrebenoit evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT devroeydirk evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT vandeunelias evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT faeskristof evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT charliernathan evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT verhaeghenick evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT remmenroy evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT anthierenssibyl evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT sermeuswalter evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium AT macqjean evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium |