Cargando…

Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium

BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goderis, Geert, Colman, Elien, Irusta, Lucia Alvarez, Van Hecke, Ann, Pétré, Benoit, Devroey, Dirk, Van Deun, Elias, Faes, Kristof, Charlier, Nathan, Verhaeghe, Nick, Remmen, Roy, Anthierens, Sibyl, Sermeus, Walter, Macq, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024426
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435
_version_ 1783587335300972544
author Goderis, Geert
Colman, Elien
Irusta, Lucia Alvarez
Van Hecke, Ann
Pétré, Benoit
Devroey, Dirk
Van Deun, Elias
Faes, Kristof
Charlier, Nathan
Verhaeghe, Nick
Remmen, Roy
Anthierens, Sibyl
Sermeus, Walter
Macq, Jean
author_facet Goderis, Geert
Colman, Elien
Irusta, Lucia Alvarez
Van Hecke, Ann
Pétré, Benoit
Devroey, Dirk
Van Deun, Elias
Faes, Kristof
Charlier, Nathan
Verhaeghe, Nick
Remmen, Roy
Anthierens, Sibyl
Sermeus, Walter
Macq, Jean
author_sort Goderis, Geert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS: A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS: A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION: The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7518071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75180712020-10-05 Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium Goderis, Geert Colman, Elien Irusta, Lucia Alvarez Van Hecke, Ann Pétré, Benoit Devroey, Dirk Van Deun, Elias Faes, Kristof Charlier, Nathan Verhaeghe, Nick Remmen, Roy Anthierens, Sibyl Sermeus, Walter Macq, Jean Int J Integr Care Research and Theory BACKGROUND: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ‘Integrated Care for Better Health’ aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS: A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS: A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION: The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal. Ubiquity Press 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7518071/ /pubmed/33024426 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Goderis, Geert
Colman, Elien
Irusta, Lucia Alvarez
Van Hecke, Ann
Pétré, Benoit
Devroey, Dirk
Van Deun, Elias
Faes, Kristof
Charlier, Nathan
Verhaeghe, Nick
Remmen, Roy
Anthierens, Sibyl
Sermeus, Walter
Macq, Jean
Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title_full Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title_fullStr Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title_short Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium
title_sort evaluating large-scale integrated care projects: the development of a protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation study in belgium
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024426
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435
work_keys_str_mv AT goderisgeert evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT colmanelien evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT irustaluciaalvarez evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT vanheckeann evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT petrebenoit evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT devroeydirk evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT vandeunelias evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT faeskristof evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT charliernathan evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT verhaeghenick evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT remmenroy evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT anthierenssibyl evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT sermeuswalter evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium
AT macqjean evaluatinglargescaleintegratedcareprojectsthedevelopmentofaprotocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationstudyinbelgium