Cargando…
Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception
In this article, we review recent advances in research on rhythm and musical beat perception, focusing on the role of predictive processes in auditory motor interactions. We suggest that experimental evidence of the motor system’s role in beat perception, including in passive listening, may be expla...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578546 |
_version_ | 1783587343502934016 |
---|---|
author | Proksch, Shannon Comstock, Daniel C. Médé, Butovens Pabst, Alexandria Balasubramaniam, Ramesh |
author_facet | Proksch, Shannon Comstock, Daniel C. Médé, Butovens Pabst, Alexandria Balasubramaniam, Ramesh |
author_sort | Proksch, Shannon |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we review recent advances in research on rhythm and musical beat perception, focusing on the role of predictive processes in auditory motor interactions. We suggest that experimental evidence of the motor system’s role in beat perception, including in passive listening, may be explained by the generation and maintenance of internal predictive models, concordant with the Active Inference framework of sensory processing. We highlight two complementary hypotheses for the neural underpinnings of rhythm perception: The Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction hypothesis (Patel and Iversen, 2014) and the Gradual Audiomotor Evolution hypothesis (Merchant and Honing, 2014) and review recent experimental progress supporting each of these hypotheses. While initial formulations of ASAP and GAE explain different aspects of beat-based timing–the involvement of motor structures in the absence of movement, and physical entrainment to an auditory beat respectively–we suggest that work under both hypotheses provide converging evidence toward understanding the predictive role of the motor system in the perception of rhythm, and the specific neural mechanisms involved. We discuss future experimental work necessary to further evaluate the causal neural mechanisms underlying beat and rhythm perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7518112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75181122020-10-13 Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception Proksch, Shannon Comstock, Daniel C. Médé, Butovens Pabst, Alexandria Balasubramaniam, Ramesh Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience In this article, we review recent advances in research on rhythm and musical beat perception, focusing on the role of predictive processes in auditory motor interactions. We suggest that experimental evidence of the motor system’s role in beat perception, including in passive listening, may be explained by the generation and maintenance of internal predictive models, concordant with the Active Inference framework of sensory processing. We highlight two complementary hypotheses for the neural underpinnings of rhythm perception: The Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction hypothesis (Patel and Iversen, 2014) and the Gradual Audiomotor Evolution hypothesis (Merchant and Honing, 2014) and review recent experimental progress supporting each of these hypotheses. While initial formulations of ASAP and GAE explain different aspects of beat-based timing–the involvement of motor structures in the absence of movement, and physical entrainment to an auditory beat respectively–we suggest that work under both hypotheses provide converging evidence toward understanding the predictive role of the motor system in the perception of rhythm, and the specific neural mechanisms involved. We discuss future experimental work necessary to further evaluate the causal neural mechanisms underlying beat and rhythm perception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7518112/ /pubmed/33061902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578546 Text en Copyright © 2020 Proksch, Comstock, Médé, Pabst and Balasubramaniam. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Proksch, Shannon Comstock, Daniel C. Médé, Butovens Pabst, Alexandria Balasubramaniam, Ramesh Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title | Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title_full | Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title_fullStr | Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title_short | Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception |
title_sort | motor and predictive processes in auditory beat and rhythm perception |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prokschshannon motorandpredictiveprocessesinauditorybeatandrhythmperception AT comstockdanielc motorandpredictiveprocessesinauditorybeatandrhythmperception AT medebutovens motorandpredictiveprocessesinauditorybeatandrhythmperception AT pabstalexandria motorandpredictiveprocessesinauditorybeatandrhythmperception AT balasubramaniamramesh motorandpredictiveprocessesinauditorybeatandrhythmperception |