Cargando…

GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae

Chemotactic/chemotropic cells follow accurately the direction of gradients of regulatory molecules. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) function as chemoattractant receptors to guide polarized responses. In “a” mating type yeast, the GPCR Ste2 senses the α-cell’s pheromone. Previously, phosphory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasen, Gustavo, Dunayevich, Paula, Constantinou, Andreas, Colman-Lerner, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667
_version_ 1783587400065220608
author Vasen, Gustavo
Dunayevich, Paula
Constantinou, Andreas
Colman-Lerner, Alejandro
author_facet Vasen, Gustavo
Dunayevich, Paula
Constantinou, Andreas
Colman-Lerner, Alejandro
author_sort Vasen, Gustavo
collection PubMed
description Chemotactic/chemotropic cells follow accurately the direction of gradients of regulatory molecules. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) function as chemoattractant receptors to guide polarized responses. In “a” mating type yeast, the GPCR Ste2 senses the α-cell’s pheromone. Previously, phosphorylation and trafficking of this receptor have been implicated in the process of gradient sensing, where cells dynamically correct growth. Correction is often necessary since yeast have intrinsic polarity sites that interfere with a correct initial gradient decoding. We have recently showed that when actively dividing (not in G1) yeast are exposed to a uniform pheromone concentration, they initiate a pheromone-induced polarization next to the mother–daughter cytokinesis site. Then, they reorient their growth to the intrinsic polarity site. Here, to study if Ste2 phosphorylation and internalization are involved in this process, we generated receptor variants combining three types of mutated signals for the first time: phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and the NPFX(1,2)D Sla1-binding motif. We first characterized their effect on endocytosis and found that these processes regulate internalization in a more complex manner than previously shown. Interestingly, we showed that receptor phosphorylation can drive internalization independently of ubiquitylation and the NPFX(1,2)D motif. When tested in our assays, cells expressing either phosphorylation or endocytosis-deficient receptors were able to switch away from the cytokinesis site to find the intrinsic polarity site as efficiently as their WT counterparts. Thus, we conclude that these processes are not necessary for the reorientation of polarization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7518455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75184552020-10-01 GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae Vasen, Gustavo Dunayevich, Paula Constantinou, Andreas Colman-Lerner, Alejandro Commun Integr Biol Short Communication Chemotactic/chemotropic cells follow accurately the direction of gradients of regulatory molecules. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) function as chemoattractant receptors to guide polarized responses. In “a” mating type yeast, the GPCR Ste2 senses the α-cell’s pheromone. Previously, phosphorylation and trafficking of this receptor have been implicated in the process of gradient sensing, where cells dynamically correct growth. Correction is often necessary since yeast have intrinsic polarity sites that interfere with a correct initial gradient decoding. We have recently showed that when actively dividing (not in G1) yeast are exposed to a uniform pheromone concentration, they initiate a pheromone-induced polarization next to the mother–daughter cytokinesis site. Then, they reorient their growth to the intrinsic polarity site. Here, to study if Ste2 phosphorylation and internalization are involved in this process, we generated receptor variants combining three types of mutated signals for the first time: phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and the NPFX(1,2)D Sla1-binding motif. We first characterized their effect on endocytosis and found that these processes regulate internalization in a more complex manner than previously shown. Interestingly, we showed that receptor phosphorylation can drive internalization independently of ubiquitylation and the NPFX(1,2)D motif. When tested in our assays, cells expressing either phosphorylation or endocytosis-deficient receptors were able to switch away from the cytokinesis site to find the intrinsic polarity site as efficiently as their WT counterparts. Thus, we conclude that these processes are not necessary for the reorientation of polarization. Taylor & Francis 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7518455/ /pubmed/33014265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Vasen, Gustavo
Dunayevich, Paula
Constantinou, Andreas
Colman-Lerner, Alejandro
GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title_full GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title_fullStr GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title_short GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
title_sort gpcr receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in s. cerevisiae
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667
work_keys_str_mv AT vasengustavo gpcrreceptorphosphorylationandendocytosisarenotnecessarytoswitchpolarizedgrowthbetweeninternalcuesduringpheromoneresponseinscerevisiae
AT dunayevichpaula gpcrreceptorphosphorylationandendocytosisarenotnecessarytoswitchpolarizedgrowthbetweeninternalcuesduringpheromoneresponseinscerevisiae
AT constantinouandreas gpcrreceptorphosphorylationandendocytosisarenotnecessarytoswitchpolarizedgrowthbetweeninternalcuesduringpheromoneresponseinscerevisiae
AT colmanlerneralejandro gpcrreceptorphosphorylationandendocytosisarenotnecessarytoswitchpolarizedgrowthbetweeninternalcuesduringpheromoneresponseinscerevisiae