Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, debilitating disease characterized by juxtaepithelial fibrosis. The present study evaluates the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) and bovine collagen membrane as reconstruction options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample size includes 22 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandey, Arun, Sharma, Naresh Kumar, Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar, Jaiswara, Chandresh, Tiwari, Preeti, Singh, Akhilesh Kumar, Verma, Vishal, Singh, Shankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_70_19
_version_ 1783587408810344448
author Pandey, Arun
Sharma, Naresh Kumar
Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar
Jaiswara, Chandresh
Tiwari, Preeti
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Verma, Vishal
Singh, Shankar
author_facet Pandey, Arun
Sharma, Naresh Kumar
Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar
Jaiswara, Chandresh
Tiwari, Preeti
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Verma, Vishal
Singh, Shankar
author_sort Pandey, Arun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, debilitating disease characterized by juxtaepithelial fibrosis. The present study evaluates the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) and bovine collagen membrane as reconstruction options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample size includes 22 patients between 20 and 60 years, randomly distributed in two groups: Group I in which BFP was used and Group II where BFP with bovine collagen membrane was used after surgical resection of fibrotic bands. The clinical evaluation on postoperative 1(st), 3(rd), and 5(th) days and 1(st), 2(nd), 3(rd), 4(th), 12(th), and 24(th) weeks subsequently. RESULTS: The mean age in Group I was 27.17 ± 3.157 years and Group II was 37.90 ± 6.657 years. The mean preoperative mouth opening was 9.75 ± 6.717 and 8.90 ± 3.784 mm in Groups I and II, respectively. The mean duration of presenting illness in Group I was 9.75 ± 2.598 years and in Group II was 8.80 ± 1.989 years. There was no significant difference observed between Groups I and II in relation to reduced mouth opening and duration of symptoms (P > 0.05) except for age. No significant difference was observed between both the groups in relation to preoperative pain, burning sensation, cheek stiffness, mucosal suppleness, postoperative infection, and postoperative pain at days 1 and 5 and 1(st) week. There was a significant difference observed in postoperative pain among both the groups on the 3(rd) day and 2(nd) week. CONCLUSION: In the present study, both the groups have proved to give better results, as BFP in the form of interposition material showed rapid epithelization and minimum wound contracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7518498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75184982020-10-09 Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study Pandey, Arun Sharma, Naresh Kumar Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar Jaiswara, Chandresh Tiwari, Preeti Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Verma, Vishal Singh, Shankar Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, debilitating disease characterized by juxtaepithelial fibrosis. The present study evaluates the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) and bovine collagen membrane as reconstruction options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample size includes 22 patients between 20 and 60 years, randomly distributed in two groups: Group I in which BFP was used and Group II where BFP with bovine collagen membrane was used after surgical resection of fibrotic bands. The clinical evaluation on postoperative 1(st), 3(rd), and 5(th) days and 1(st), 2(nd), 3(rd), 4(th), 12(th), and 24(th) weeks subsequently. RESULTS: The mean age in Group I was 27.17 ± 3.157 years and Group II was 37.90 ± 6.657 years. The mean preoperative mouth opening was 9.75 ± 6.717 and 8.90 ± 3.784 mm in Groups I and II, respectively. The mean duration of presenting illness in Group I was 9.75 ± 2.598 years and in Group II was 8.80 ± 1.989 years. There was no significant difference observed between Groups I and II in relation to reduced mouth opening and duration of symptoms (P > 0.05) except for age. No significant difference was observed between both the groups in relation to preoperative pain, burning sensation, cheek stiffness, mucosal suppleness, postoperative infection, and postoperative pain at days 1 and 5 and 1(st) week. There was a significant difference observed in postoperative pain among both the groups on the 3(rd) day and 2(nd) week. CONCLUSION: In the present study, both the groups have proved to give better results, as BFP in the form of interposition material showed rapid epithelization and minimum wound contracture. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7518498/ /pubmed/33041578 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_70_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pandey, Arun
Sharma, Naresh Kumar
Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar
Jaiswara, Chandresh
Tiwari, Preeti
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Verma, Vishal
Singh, Shankar
Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title_full Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title_short Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
title_sort comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_70_19
work_keys_str_mv AT pandeyarun comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT sharmanareshkumar comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT dhimanneerajkumar comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT jaiswarachandresh comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT tiwaripreeti comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT singhakhileshkumar comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT vermavishal comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT singhshankar comparativeevaluationofbuccalpadoffatwithandwithoutbovinecollagenmembraneinthemanagementoforalsubmucousfibrosisaprospectiveclinicalstudy