Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Liangjun, Xu, Fang, Lao, Shan, Zhao, Jingmin, Wei, Qingjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32976534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239341
_version_ 1783587427464511488
author Zhao, Liangjun
Xu, Fang
Lao, Shan
Zhao, Jingmin
Wei, Qingjun
author_facet Zhao, Liangjun
Xu, Fang
Lao, Shan
Zhao, Jingmin
Wei, Qingjun
author_sort Zhao, Liangjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty separately to determine whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty can provide better lower extremity radiographic results and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched literatures to identify relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of computer-assisted and traditional methods in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. After screening, quality evaluation and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality and bias risks of the included studies were evaluated. The meta-analysis compared the radiographic results, functional outcomes and complications of the two techniques. RESULTS: Six clinical controlled trials were included, with total of 1098 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the accuracy in terms of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal alignment of the tibial component in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty was significantly better than those in traditional total knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in the functional results, revision rates or aseptic loosening rates between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: After excluding individual differences such as bone development and bone quality, although computer-assisted techniques can better accurately correct the mechanical axis of the lower extremity and the position of prosthesis implantation than traditional techniques, there is no significant difference in the functional results and revision rate of bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the same individual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7518627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75186272020-10-02 Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zhao, Liangjun Xu, Fang Lao, Shan Zhao, Jingmin Wei, Qingjun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty separately to determine whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty can provide better lower extremity radiographic results and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched literatures to identify relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of computer-assisted and traditional methods in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. After screening, quality evaluation and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality and bias risks of the included studies were evaluated. The meta-analysis compared the radiographic results, functional outcomes and complications of the two techniques. RESULTS: Six clinical controlled trials were included, with total of 1098 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the accuracy in terms of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal alignment of the tibial component in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty was significantly better than those in traditional total knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in the functional results, revision rates or aseptic loosening rates between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: After excluding individual differences such as bone development and bone quality, although computer-assisted techniques can better accurately correct the mechanical axis of the lower extremity and the position of prosthesis implantation than traditional techniques, there is no significant difference in the functional results and revision rate of bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the same individual. Public Library of Science 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7518627/ /pubmed/32976534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239341 Text en © 2020 Zhao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Liangjun
Xu, Fang
Lao, Shan
Zhao, Jingmin
Wei, Qingjun
Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32976534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239341
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoliangjun comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofcomputerassistedandtraditionaltechniquesinbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xufang comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofcomputerassistedandtraditionaltechniquesinbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laoshan comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofcomputerassistedandtraditionaltechniquesinbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhaojingmin comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofcomputerassistedandtraditionaltechniquesinbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weiqingjun comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofcomputerassistedandtraditionaltechniquesinbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials