Cargando…

Populations in environments with a soft carrying capacity are eventually extinct

Consider a population whose size changes stepwise by its members reproducing or dying (disappearing), but is otherwise quite general. Denote the initial (non-random) size by [Formula: see text] and the size of the nth change by [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] . Population sizes hence devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jagers, Peter, Zuyev, Sergei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00285-020-01527-5
Descripción
Sumario:Consider a population whose size changes stepwise by its members reproducing or dying (disappearing), but is otherwise quite general. Denote the initial (non-random) size by [Formula: see text] and the size of the nth change by [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] . Population sizes hence develop successively as [Formula: see text] and so on, indefinitely or until there are no further size changes, due to extinction. Extinction is thus assumed final, so that [Formula: see text] implies that [Formula: see text] , without there being any other finite absorbing class of population sizes. We make no assumptions about the time durations between the successive changes. In the real world, or more specific models, those may be of varying length, depending upon individual life span distributions and their interdependencies, the age-distribution at hand and intervening circumstances. We could consider toy models of Galton–Watson type generation counting or of the birth-and-death type, with one individual acting per change, until extinction, or the most general multitype CMJ branching processes with, say, population size dependence of reproduction. Changes may have quite varying distributions. The basic assumption is that there is a carrying capacity, i.e. a non-negative number K such that the conditional expectation of the change, given the complete past history, is non-positive whenever the population exceeds the carrying capacity. Further, to avoid unnecessary technicalities, we assume that the change [Formula: see text] equals -1 (one individual dying) with a conditional (given the past) probability uniformly bounded away from 0. It is a simple and not very restrictive way to avoid parity phenomena, it is related to irreducibility in Markov settings. The straightforward, but in contents and implications far-reaching, consequence is that all such populations must die out. Mathematically, it follows by a supermartingale convergence property and positive probability of reaching the absorbing extinction state.