Cargando…
Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y |
_version_ | 1783587512977981440 |
---|---|
author | Sahli, Riad Prot, Aubin Wang, Anle Müser, Martin H. Piovarči, Michal Didyk, Piotr Bennewitz, Roland |
author_facet | Sahli, Riad Prot, Aubin Wang, Anle Müser, Martin H. Piovarči, Michal Didyk, Piotr Bennewitz, Roland |
author_sort | Sahli, Riad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences in the Hurst roughness exponent of 0.2, or a difference in surface curvature of 0.8 [Formula: see text] for surfaces with curvatures between 1 and 3 [Formula: see text] . In contrast, visual perception of similarity between color-coded images of the surface height was dominated by their topographic resemblance. We conclude that vibration cues from roughness at the length scale of the finger ridge distance distract the participants from including the topography into the judgement of similarity. The interaction between surface asperities and fingertip skin led to higher friction for higher micro-scale roughness. Individual friction data allowed us to construct a psychometric curve which relates similarity decisions to differences in friction. Participants noticed differences in the friction coefficient as small as 0.035 for samples with friction coefficients between 0.34 and 0.45. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7519105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75191052020-09-29 Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces Sahli, Riad Prot, Aubin Wang, Anle Müser, Martin H. Piovarči, Michal Didyk, Piotr Bennewitz, Roland Sci Rep Article Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences in the Hurst roughness exponent of 0.2, or a difference in surface curvature of 0.8 [Formula: see text] for surfaces with curvatures between 1 and 3 [Formula: see text] . In contrast, visual perception of similarity between color-coded images of the surface height was dominated by their topographic resemblance. We conclude that vibration cues from roughness at the length scale of the finger ridge distance distract the participants from including the topography into the judgement of similarity. The interaction between surface asperities and fingertip skin led to higher friction for higher micro-scale roughness. Individual friction data allowed us to construct a psychometric curve which relates similarity decisions to differences in friction. Participants noticed differences in the friction coefficient as small as 0.035 for samples with friction coefficients between 0.34 and 0.45. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7519105/ /pubmed/32978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sahli, Riad Prot, Aubin Wang, Anle Müser, Martin H. Piovarči, Michal Didyk, Piotr Bennewitz, Roland Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title | Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title_full | Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title_fullStr | Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title_short | Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
title_sort | tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahliriad tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT protaubin tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT wanganle tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT musermartinh tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT piovarcimichal tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT didykpiotr tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces AT bennewitzroland tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces |