Cargando…

Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces

Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahli, Riad, Prot, Aubin, Wang, Anle, Müser, Martin H., Piovarči, Michal, Didyk, Piotr, Bennewitz, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y
_version_ 1783587512977981440
author Sahli, Riad
Prot, Aubin
Wang, Anle
Müser, Martin H.
Piovarči, Michal
Didyk, Piotr
Bennewitz, Roland
author_facet Sahli, Riad
Prot, Aubin
Wang, Anle
Müser, Martin H.
Piovarči, Michal
Didyk, Piotr
Bennewitz, Roland
author_sort Sahli, Riad
collection PubMed
description Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences in the Hurst roughness exponent of 0.2, or a difference in surface curvature of 0.8 [Formula: see text] for surfaces with curvatures between 1 and 3 [Formula: see text] . In contrast, visual perception of similarity between color-coded images of the surface height was dominated by their topographic resemblance. We conclude that vibration cues from roughness at the length scale of the finger ridge distance distract the participants from including the topography into the judgement of similarity. The interaction between surface asperities and fingertip skin led to higher friction for higher micro-scale roughness. Individual friction data allowed us to construct a psychometric curve which relates similarity decisions to differences in friction. Participants noticed differences in the friction coefficient as small as 0.035 for samples with friction coefficients between 0.34 and 0.45.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7519105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75191052020-09-29 Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces Sahli, Riad Prot, Aubin Wang, Anle Müser, Martin H. Piovarči, Michal Didyk, Piotr Bennewitz, Roland Sci Rep Article Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences in the Hurst roughness exponent of 0.2, or a difference in surface curvature of 0.8 [Formula: see text] for surfaces with curvatures between 1 and 3 [Formula: see text] . In contrast, visual perception of similarity between color-coded images of the surface height was dominated by their topographic resemblance. We conclude that vibration cues from roughness at the length scale of the finger ridge distance distract the participants from including the topography into the judgement of similarity. The interaction between surface asperities and fingertip skin led to higher friction for higher micro-scale roughness. Individual friction data allowed us to construct a psychometric curve which relates similarity decisions to differences in friction. Participants noticed differences in the friction coefficient as small as 0.035 for samples with friction coefficients between 0.34 and 0.45. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7519105/ /pubmed/32978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sahli, Riad
Prot, Aubin
Wang, Anle
Müser, Martin H.
Piovarči, Michal
Didyk, Piotr
Bennewitz, Roland
Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title_full Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title_fullStr Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title_short Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
title_sort tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sahliriad tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT protaubin tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT wanganle tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT musermartinh tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT piovarcimichal tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT didykpiotr tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces
AT bennewitzroland tactileperceptionofrandomlyroughsurfaces