Cargando…
Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964 |
_version_ | 1783587557745885184 |
---|---|
author | Ramesh, Hasini Ashok, Rupa Rajan, Mathan Balaji, Lakshmi Ganesh, Arathi |
author_facet | Ramesh, Hasini Ashok, Rupa Rajan, Mathan Balaji, Lakshmi Ganesh, Arathi |
author_sort | Ramesh, Hasini |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library for the identification of relevant studies, from their inception until February 2020 and an additional search was done with the reference lists of included articles. STUDY SELECTION: The review protocol followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018112805). The risk of bias of the studies was independently appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). DATA: Ten articles were considered relevant for qualitative synthesis. The data extracted from two of the included articles showed statistically significant difference between the two materials based on their retention potential, of which one article favored superior retention of flowable composites and one article favored higher retention of PFS and the other eight studies showed no significant difference between the two materials. CONCLUSION: The current review has shown evidence suggesting the effective retention of resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants and flowable composites when applied to prevent occlusal caries in permanent molars, however, this evidence is of low quality. Carefully designed long-term clinical trials are required to support the results of this review. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is an important topic that would be of significant interest in the field of preventive dentistry, where sealants are the primary recommended method to prevent caries. The clinical efficacy of sealants is directly linked to their potential to retain and this systematic review focuses on comparing the relative effectiveness of resin-based pit-and-fissure-sealants with flowable composites in permanent teeth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7519376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75193762020-09-30 Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review Ramesh, Hasini Ashok, Rupa Rajan, Mathan Balaji, Lakshmi Ganesh, Arathi Heliyon Review Article OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library for the identification of relevant studies, from their inception until February 2020 and an additional search was done with the reference lists of included articles. STUDY SELECTION: The review protocol followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018112805). The risk of bias of the studies was independently appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). DATA: Ten articles were considered relevant for qualitative synthesis. The data extracted from two of the included articles showed statistically significant difference between the two materials based on their retention potential, of which one article favored superior retention of flowable composites and one article favored higher retention of PFS and the other eight studies showed no significant difference between the two materials. CONCLUSION: The current review has shown evidence suggesting the effective retention of resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants and flowable composites when applied to prevent occlusal caries in permanent molars, however, this evidence is of low quality. Carefully designed long-term clinical trials are required to support the results of this review. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is an important topic that would be of significant interest in the field of preventive dentistry, where sealants are the primary recommended method to prevent caries. The clinical efficacy of sealants is directly linked to their potential to retain and this systematic review focuses on comparing the relative effectiveness of resin-based pit-and-fissure-sealants with flowable composites in permanent teeth. Elsevier 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7519376/ /pubmed/33005790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ramesh, Hasini Ashok, Rupa Rajan, Mathan Balaji, Lakshmi Ganesh, Arathi Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title | Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title_full | Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title_short | Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review |
title_sort | retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rameshhasini retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview AT ashokrupa retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview AT rajanmathan retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview AT balajilakshmi retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview AT ganesharathi retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview |