Cargando…

Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramesh, Hasini, Ashok, Rupa, Rajan, Mathan, Balaji, Lakshmi, Ganesh, Arathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964
_version_ 1783587557745885184
author Ramesh, Hasini
Ashok, Rupa
Rajan, Mathan
Balaji, Lakshmi
Ganesh, Arathi
author_facet Ramesh, Hasini
Ashok, Rupa
Rajan, Mathan
Balaji, Lakshmi
Ganesh, Arathi
author_sort Ramesh, Hasini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library for the identification of relevant studies, from their inception until February 2020 and an additional search was done with the reference lists of included articles. STUDY SELECTION: The review protocol followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018112805). The risk of bias of the studies was independently appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). DATA: Ten articles were considered relevant for qualitative synthesis. The data extracted from two of the included articles showed statistically significant difference between the two materials based on their retention potential, of which one article favored superior retention of flowable composites and one article favored higher retention of PFS and the other eight studies showed no significant difference between the two materials. CONCLUSION: The current review has shown evidence suggesting the effective retention of resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants and flowable composites when applied to prevent occlusal caries in permanent molars, however, this evidence is of low quality. Carefully designed long-term clinical trials are required to support the results of this review. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is an important topic that would be of significant interest in the field of preventive dentistry, where sealants are the primary recommended method to prevent caries. The clinical efficacy of sealants is directly linked to their potential to retain and this systematic review focuses on comparing the relative effectiveness of resin-based pit-and-fissure-sealants with flowable composites in permanent teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7519376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75193762020-09-30 Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review Ramesh, Hasini Ashok, Rupa Rajan, Mathan Balaji, Lakshmi Ganesh, Arathi Heliyon Review Article OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available clinical evidence on the relative effectiveness of retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (PFS) with that of flowable composites on occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth when evaluated in clinical trials. SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library for the identification of relevant studies, from their inception until February 2020 and an additional search was done with the reference lists of included articles. STUDY SELECTION: The review protocol followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018112805). The risk of bias of the studies was independently appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). DATA: Ten articles were considered relevant for qualitative synthesis. The data extracted from two of the included articles showed statistically significant difference between the two materials based on their retention potential, of which one article favored superior retention of flowable composites and one article favored higher retention of PFS and the other eight studies showed no significant difference between the two materials. CONCLUSION: The current review has shown evidence suggesting the effective retention of resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants and flowable composites when applied to prevent occlusal caries in permanent molars, however, this evidence is of low quality. Carefully designed long-term clinical trials are required to support the results of this review. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is an important topic that would be of significant interest in the field of preventive dentistry, where sealants are the primary recommended method to prevent caries. The clinical efficacy of sealants is directly linked to their potential to retain and this systematic review focuses on comparing the relative effectiveness of resin-based pit-and-fissure-sealants with flowable composites in permanent teeth. Elsevier 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7519376/ /pubmed/33005790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Ramesh, Hasini
Ashok, Rupa
Rajan, Mathan
Balaji, Lakshmi
Ganesh, Arathi
Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title_full Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title_fullStr Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title_short Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
title_sort retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshhasini retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview
AT ashokrupa retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview
AT rajanmathan retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview
AT balajilakshmi retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview
AT ganesharathi retentionofpitandfissuresealantsversusflowablecompositesinpermanentteethasystematicreview