Cargando…

Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study

BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turicchi, Jake, O'Driscoll, Ruairi, Finlayson, Graham, Duarte, Cristiana, Palmeira, A L, Larsen, Sofus C, Heitmann, Berit L, Stubbs, R James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915155
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977
_version_ 1783587569074700288
author Turicchi, Jake
O'Driscoll, Ruairi
Finlayson, Graham
Duarte, Cristiana
Palmeira, A L
Larsen, Sofus C
Heitmann, Berit L
Stubbs, R James
author_facet Turicchi, Jake
O'Driscoll, Ruairi
Finlayson, Graham
Duarte, Cristiana
Palmeira, A L
Larsen, Sofus C
Heitmann, Berit L
Stubbs, R James
author_sort Turicchi, Jake
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the frequent collection of body weight data from electronic smart scales, new opportunities to analyze and identify patterns in body weight data are available. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare multiple methods of data imputation and BWV calculation using linear and nonlinear approaches METHODS: In total, 50 participants from an ongoing weight loss maintenance study (the NoHoW study) were selected to develop the procedure. We addressed the following aspects of data analysis: cleaning, imputation, detrending, and calculation of total and local BWV. To test imputation, missing data were simulated at random and using real patterns of missingness. A total of 10 imputation strategies were tested. Next, BWV was calculated using linear and nonlinear approaches, and the effects of missing data and data imputation on these estimates were investigated. RESULTS: Body weight imputation using structural modeling with Kalman smoothing or an exponentially weighted moving average provided the best agreement with observed values (root mean square error range 0.62%-0.64%). Imputation performance decreased with missingness and was similar between random and nonrandom simulations. Errors in BWV estimations from missing simulated data sets were low (2%-7% with 80% missing data or a mean of 67, SD 40.1 available body weights) compared with that of imputation strategies where errors were significantly greater, varying by imputation method. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to impute body weight data depends on the purpose of the analysis. Directions for the best performing imputation methods are provided. For the purpose of estimating BWV, data imputation should not be conducted. Linear and nonlinear methods of estimating BWV provide reasonably accurate estimates under high proportions (80%) of missing data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7519428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75194282020-10-09 Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study Turicchi, Jake O'Driscoll, Ruairi Finlayson, Graham Duarte, Cristiana Palmeira, A L Larsen, Sofus C Heitmann, Berit L Stubbs, R James JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the frequent collection of body weight data from electronic smart scales, new opportunities to analyze and identify patterns in body weight data are available. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare multiple methods of data imputation and BWV calculation using linear and nonlinear approaches METHODS: In total, 50 participants from an ongoing weight loss maintenance study (the NoHoW study) were selected to develop the procedure. We addressed the following aspects of data analysis: cleaning, imputation, detrending, and calculation of total and local BWV. To test imputation, missing data were simulated at random and using real patterns of missingness. A total of 10 imputation strategies were tested. Next, BWV was calculated using linear and nonlinear approaches, and the effects of missing data and data imputation on these estimates were investigated. RESULTS: Body weight imputation using structural modeling with Kalman smoothing or an exponentially weighted moving average provided the best agreement with observed values (root mean square error range 0.62%-0.64%). Imputation performance decreased with missingness and was similar between random and nonrandom simulations. Errors in BWV estimations from missing simulated data sets were low (2%-7% with 80% missing data or a mean of 67, SD 40.1 available body weights) compared with that of imputation strategies where errors were significantly greater, varying by imputation method. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to impute body weight data depends on the purpose of the analysis. Directions for the best performing imputation methods are provided. For the purpose of estimating BWV, data imputation should not be conducted. Linear and nonlinear methods of estimating BWV provide reasonably accurate estimates under high proportions (80%) of missing data. JMIR Publications 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7519428/ /pubmed/32915155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977 Text en ©Jake Turicchi, Ruairi O'Driscoll, Graham Finlayson, Cristiana Duarte, A L Palmeira, Sofus C Larsen, Berit L Heitmann, R James Stubbs. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.09.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Turicchi, Jake
O'Driscoll, Ruairi
Finlayson, Graham
Duarte, Cristiana
Palmeira, A L
Larsen, Sofus C
Heitmann, Berit L
Stubbs, R James
Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title_full Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title_fullStr Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title_short Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
title_sort data imputation and body weight variability calculation using linear and nonlinear methods in data collected from digital smart scales: simulation and validation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915155
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977
work_keys_str_mv AT turicchijake dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT odriscollruairi dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT finlaysongraham dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT duartecristiana dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT palmeiraal dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT larsensofusc dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT heitmannberitl dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy
AT stubbsrjames dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy