Cargando…
Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977 |
_version_ | 1783587569074700288 |
---|---|
author | Turicchi, Jake O'Driscoll, Ruairi Finlayson, Graham Duarte, Cristiana Palmeira, A L Larsen, Sofus C Heitmann, Berit L Stubbs, R James |
author_facet | Turicchi, Jake O'Driscoll, Ruairi Finlayson, Graham Duarte, Cristiana Palmeira, A L Larsen, Sofus C Heitmann, Berit L Stubbs, R James |
author_sort | Turicchi, Jake |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the frequent collection of body weight data from electronic smart scales, new opportunities to analyze and identify patterns in body weight data are available. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare multiple methods of data imputation and BWV calculation using linear and nonlinear approaches METHODS: In total, 50 participants from an ongoing weight loss maintenance study (the NoHoW study) were selected to develop the procedure. We addressed the following aspects of data analysis: cleaning, imputation, detrending, and calculation of total and local BWV. To test imputation, missing data were simulated at random and using real patterns of missingness. A total of 10 imputation strategies were tested. Next, BWV was calculated using linear and nonlinear approaches, and the effects of missing data and data imputation on these estimates were investigated. RESULTS: Body weight imputation using structural modeling with Kalman smoothing or an exponentially weighted moving average provided the best agreement with observed values (root mean square error range 0.62%-0.64%). Imputation performance decreased with missingness and was similar between random and nonrandom simulations. Errors in BWV estimations from missing simulated data sets were low (2%-7% with 80% missing data or a mean of 67, SD 40.1 available body weights) compared with that of imputation strategies where errors were significantly greater, varying by imputation method. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to impute body weight data depends on the purpose of the analysis. Directions for the best performing imputation methods are provided. For the purpose of estimating BWV, data imputation should not be conducted. Linear and nonlinear methods of estimating BWV provide reasonably accurate estimates under high proportions (80%) of missing data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7519428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75194282020-10-09 Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study Turicchi, Jake O'Driscoll, Ruairi Finlayson, Graham Duarte, Cristiana Palmeira, A L Larsen, Sofus C Heitmann, Berit L Stubbs, R James JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the frequent collection of body weight data from electronic smart scales, new opportunities to analyze and identify patterns in body weight data are available. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare multiple methods of data imputation and BWV calculation using linear and nonlinear approaches METHODS: In total, 50 participants from an ongoing weight loss maintenance study (the NoHoW study) were selected to develop the procedure. We addressed the following aspects of data analysis: cleaning, imputation, detrending, and calculation of total and local BWV. To test imputation, missing data were simulated at random and using real patterns of missingness. A total of 10 imputation strategies were tested. Next, BWV was calculated using linear and nonlinear approaches, and the effects of missing data and data imputation on these estimates were investigated. RESULTS: Body weight imputation using structural modeling with Kalman smoothing or an exponentially weighted moving average provided the best agreement with observed values (root mean square error range 0.62%-0.64%). Imputation performance decreased with missingness and was similar between random and nonrandom simulations. Errors in BWV estimations from missing simulated data sets were low (2%-7% with 80% missing data or a mean of 67, SD 40.1 available body weights) compared with that of imputation strategies where errors were significantly greater, varying by imputation method. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to impute body weight data depends on the purpose of the analysis. Directions for the best performing imputation methods are provided. For the purpose of estimating BWV, data imputation should not be conducted. Linear and nonlinear methods of estimating BWV provide reasonably accurate estimates under high proportions (80%) of missing data. JMIR Publications 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7519428/ /pubmed/32915155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977 Text en ©Jake Turicchi, Ruairi O'Driscoll, Graham Finlayson, Cristiana Duarte, A L Palmeira, Sofus C Larsen, Berit L Heitmann, R James Stubbs. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.09.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Turicchi, Jake O'Driscoll, Ruairi Finlayson, Graham Duarte, Cristiana Palmeira, A L Larsen, Sofus C Heitmann, Berit L Stubbs, R James Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title | Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title_full | Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title_fullStr | Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title_short | Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study |
title_sort | data imputation and body weight variability calculation using linear and nonlinear methods in data collected from digital smart scales: simulation and validation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turicchijake dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT odriscollruairi dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT finlaysongraham dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT duartecristiana dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT palmeiraal dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT larsensofusc dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT heitmannberitl dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy AT stubbsrjames dataimputationandbodyweightvariabilitycalculationusinglinearandnonlinearmethodsindatacollectedfromdigitalsmartscalessimulationandvalidationstudy |