Cargando…

Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach

In the last few years, the application of quantitative methods in the field of use wear analysis has grown considerably, involving the use of different techniques. A development in surface measurements approaches has become necessary as standard assessments based upon qualitative functional analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zupancich, Andrea, Cristiani, Emanuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0
_version_ 1783587611569291264
author Zupancich, Andrea
Cristiani, Emanuela
author_facet Zupancich, Andrea
Cristiani, Emanuela
author_sort Zupancich, Andrea
collection PubMed
description In the last few years, the application of quantitative methods in the field of use wear analysis has grown considerably, involving the use of different techniques. A development in surface measurements approaches has become necessary as standard assessments based upon qualitative functional analysis are often affected by a degree of subjectivity and a limited reproducibility. To advance the current methodological debate on functional analysis of ground stone technology, we present a combined methodological approach, including qualitative and quantitative analyses, applied to the study of experimental sandstone ground stone tools. We test surface quantification at a macro and micro-scale, paired with the observation and description of residue and use wear connected to the processing of plant, animal and mineral matters. Our results provide an exhaustive quantitative dataset concerning surface modifications associated with different uses and suggest an analytical workflow for the functional analysis of both experimental and archaeological ground stone assemblages. We also highlight the limitation and pitfalls of an exclusive adoption of quantitative methods in the study of ancient tool use demonstrating how a synergetic approach can enhance the quality, reproducibility and comparability of functional data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7519652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75196522020-09-29 Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach Zupancich, Andrea Cristiani, Emanuela Sci Rep Article In the last few years, the application of quantitative methods in the field of use wear analysis has grown considerably, involving the use of different techniques. A development in surface measurements approaches has become necessary as standard assessments based upon qualitative functional analysis are often affected by a degree of subjectivity and a limited reproducibility. To advance the current methodological debate on functional analysis of ground stone technology, we present a combined methodological approach, including qualitative and quantitative analyses, applied to the study of experimental sandstone ground stone tools. We test surface quantification at a macro and micro-scale, paired with the observation and description of residue and use wear connected to the processing of plant, animal and mineral matters. Our results provide an exhaustive quantitative dataset concerning surface modifications associated with different uses and suggest an analytical workflow for the functional analysis of both experimental and archaeological ground stone assemblages. We also highlight the limitation and pitfalls of an exclusive adoption of quantitative methods in the study of ancient tool use demonstrating how a synergetic approach can enhance the quality, reproducibility and comparability of functional data. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7519652/ /pubmed/32978414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zupancich, Andrea
Cristiani, Emanuela
Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title_full Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title_fullStr Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title_full_unstemmed Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title_short Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
title_sort functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zupancichandrea functionalanalysisofsandstonegroundstonetoolsargumentsforaqualitativeandquantitativesynergeticapproach
AT cristianiemanuela functionalanalysisofsandstonegroundstonetoolsargumentsforaqualitativeandquantitativesynergeticapproach