Cargando…

"Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after failed microTESE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spahovic, Hajrudin, Alic, Jasmin, Göktolga, Ümit, Lepara, Zahid, Lepara, Orhan, Rama, Admir, Suljevic, Ismet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.279-284
_version_ 1783587700539916288
author Spahovic, Hajrudin
Alic, Jasmin
Göktolga, Ümit
Lepara, Zahid
Lepara, Orhan
Rama, Admir
Suljevic, Ismet
author_facet Spahovic, Hajrudin
Alic, Jasmin
Göktolga, Ümit
Lepara, Zahid
Lepara, Orhan
Rama, Admir
Suljevic, Ismet
author_sort Spahovic, Hajrudin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after failed microTESE procedure and outcomes of the „second-look“ procedure and to provide insight into the most common histopathological patterns after testicular biopsy within our population. METHODS: The retrospective study included 33 selected patients with NOA, who had undergone unsuccessful sperm retrieval. The diagnosis of NOA was made after the assessment of the patient’s history data, a physical examination, semen analysis, the hormonal profile, and genetic studies. After negative sperm retrieval, histopathological report has been analyzed for „second-look“ microTESE attempt. RESULTS: Five testicular histopathological patterns were found: hypospermatogenesis (9,1%), Sertoli cell-only syndrome (43%), germ cell maturation arrest (15%), seminiferous tubule hyalinization (15%), mixed pattern (21%). Y-microdeletions were detected in 5 patients, of which 3 patients showed AZFc region deletions. Only 3 patients (9,1%) underwent a „second-look“ procedure after the evaluation of histopathological reports. After the stimulation therapy and „second-look“ procedure, we had a positive outcome in a single patient (33,3%). Mean FSH value in patients with confirmed spermatogenesis was 17.26±3.11IU/l, while mean FSH value in patients without presence or germ cell statistically significantly exceeded and was 24.28±4.71IU/L (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Histopathological reports following the microTESE procedure are obligatory for the proper selection of patients who are candidates for the „second-look“ microTESE attempt. Patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome and hypospermatogenesis particularly can benefit from the “second-look” procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75200532020-10-08 "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis Spahovic, Hajrudin Alic, Jasmin Göktolga, Ümit Lepara, Zahid Lepara, Orhan Rama, Admir Suljevic, Ismet Med Arch Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after failed microTESE procedure and outcomes of the „second-look“ procedure and to provide insight into the most common histopathological patterns after testicular biopsy within our population. METHODS: The retrospective study included 33 selected patients with NOA, who had undergone unsuccessful sperm retrieval. The diagnosis of NOA was made after the assessment of the patient’s history data, a physical examination, semen analysis, the hormonal profile, and genetic studies. After negative sperm retrieval, histopathological report has been analyzed for „second-look“ microTESE attempt. RESULTS: Five testicular histopathological patterns were found: hypospermatogenesis (9,1%), Sertoli cell-only syndrome (43%), germ cell maturation arrest (15%), seminiferous tubule hyalinization (15%), mixed pattern (21%). Y-microdeletions were detected in 5 patients, of which 3 patients showed AZFc region deletions. Only 3 patients (9,1%) underwent a „second-look“ procedure after the evaluation of histopathological reports. After the stimulation therapy and „second-look“ procedure, we had a positive outcome in a single patient (33,3%). Mean FSH value in patients with confirmed spermatogenesis was 17.26±3.11IU/l, while mean FSH value in patients without presence or germ cell statistically significantly exceeded and was 24.28±4.71IU/L (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Histopathological reports following the microTESE procedure are obligatory for the proper selection of patients who are candidates for the „second-look“ microTESE attempt. Patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome and hypospermatogenesis particularly can benefit from the “second-look” procedure. Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7520053/ /pubmed/33041445 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.279-284 Text en © 2020 Hajrudin Spahovic, Jasmin Alic, Umit Goktolga, Zahid Lepara, Orhan Lepara, Admir Rama, Ismet Suljevic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Spahovic, Hajrudin
Alic, Jasmin
Göktolga, Ümit
Lepara, Zahid
Lepara, Orhan
Rama, Admir
Suljevic, Ismet
"Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title_full "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title_fullStr "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title_full_unstemmed "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title_short "Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis
title_sort "second-look" micro testicular sperm extraction (microtese) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia following histopathological analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.279-284
work_keys_str_mv AT spahovichajrudin secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT alicjasmin secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT goktolgaumit secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT leparazahid secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT leparaorhan secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT ramaadmir secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis
AT suljevicismet secondlookmicrotesticularspermextractionmicroteseinpatientswithnonobstructiveazoospermiafollowinghistopathologicalanalysis