Cargando…

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CANDENİZ, Şeyda, ÇITAKER, Seyit, BAKIRARAR, Batuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31655517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87
_version_ 1783587704388190208
author CANDENİZ, Şeyda
ÇITAKER, Seyit
BAKIRARAR, Batuhan
author_facet CANDENİZ, Şeyda
ÇITAKER, Seyit
BAKIRARAR, Batuhan
author_sort CANDENİZ, Şeyda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. The dimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient results varied between 0.721 and 0.844. Cronbach’s alpha values of the subscale were found to be between 0.847 and 0.916 in the internal consistency analysis. The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors. Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present. CONCLUSION: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75200722020-09-28 Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score CANDENİZ, Şeyda ÇITAKER, Seyit BAKIRARAR, Batuhan Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. The dimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient results varied between 0.721 and 0.844. Cronbach’s alpha values of the subscale were found to be between 0.847 and 0.916 in the internal consistency analysis. The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors. Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present. CONCLUSION: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7520072/ /pubmed/31655517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
CANDENİZ, Şeyda
ÇITAKER, Seyit
BAKIRARAR, Batuhan
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the turkish version of the neck outcome score
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31655517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87
work_keys_str_mv AT candenizseyda crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore
AT citakerseyit crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore
AT bakirararbatuhan crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore