Cargando…
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score
BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31655517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87 |
_version_ | 1783587704388190208 |
---|---|
author | CANDENİZ, Şeyda ÇITAKER, Seyit BAKIRARAR, Batuhan |
author_facet | CANDENİZ, Şeyda ÇITAKER, Seyit BAKIRARAR, Batuhan |
author_sort | CANDENİZ, Şeyda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. The dimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient results varied between 0.721 and 0.844. Cronbach’s alpha values of the subscale were found to be between 0.847 and 0.916 in the internal consistency analysis. The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors. Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present. CONCLUSION: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7520072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75200722020-09-28 Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score CANDENİZ, Şeyda ÇITAKER, Seyit BAKIRARAR, Batuhan Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. The dimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient results varied between 0.721 and 0.844. Cronbach’s alpha values of the subscale were found to be between 0.847 and 0.916 in the internal consistency analysis. The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors. Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present. CONCLUSION: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7520072/ /pubmed/31655517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article CANDENİZ, Şeyda ÇITAKER, Seyit BAKIRARAR, Batuhan Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title_full | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title_fullStr | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title_short | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score |
title_sort | cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the turkish version of the neck outcome score |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31655517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1907-87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT candenizseyda crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore AT citakerseyit crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore AT bakirararbatuhan crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheneckoutcomescore |