Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte rati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Linghong, Ren, Honghong, Pu, Lutong, Zhu, Xingyu, Liu, Yin, Ma, Xuelei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934
_version_ 1783587719444692992
author Guo, Linghong
Ren, Honghong
Pu, Lutong
Zhu, Xingyu
Liu, Yin
Ma, Xuelei
author_facet Guo, Linghong
Ren, Honghong
Pu, Lutong
Zhu, Xingyu
Liu, Yin
Ma, Xuelei
author_sort Guo, Linghong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments. METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatic artery interventional therapy after being diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2014 were enrolled. Pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were calculated, and all factors including gender, age, TNM stage, BCLC staging, inflammation factors, LDH, ALP, CEA, AFP, hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, portal vein involvement, surgical history and hepatic artery interventional treatment on overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 407 patients were included. The optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for NLR, PLR and MLR were 3.82, 140.00 and 0.27, respectively. High NLR was associated with worse OS (median survival time: high NLR group 9 vs low NLR group 19 months, HR 1.842, 95% CI: 1.457–2.329, P<0.001). Elevated PLR was negatively correlated with OS (8 vs 18 months, HR 1.677, 95% CI: 1.302–2.161, P<0.001). Patients in high MLR group had a worse OS (10 vs 21 months, HR 1.626, 95% CI: 1.291–2.048, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, NLR, LDH, ALP and portal vein involvement were independent prognostic factors for OS of HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. In addition, for patients in BCLC stage A and B, higher NLR, PLR and MLR were all significantly negatively correlated to median survival time (NLR: 17 vs 26 months, HR: 1.739 (95% CI: 1.279–2.365), P<0.001; PLR: 18 vs 26 months, HR: 1.681 (95% CI: 1.245–2.271), P=0.001; MLR: 20 vs 26 months, HR: 1.589 (95% CI: 1.185–2.129), P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Elevated pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were associated with worse survival time in HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. Among them, NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75201392020-10-14 The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study Guo, Linghong Ren, Honghong Pu, Lutong Zhu, Xingyu Liu, Yin Ma, Xuelei Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments. METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatic artery interventional therapy after being diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2014 were enrolled. Pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were calculated, and all factors including gender, age, TNM stage, BCLC staging, inflammation factors, LDH, ALP, CEA, AFP, hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, portal vein involvement, surgical history and hepatic artery interventional treatment on overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 407 patients were included. The optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for NLR, PLR and MLR were 3.82, 140.00 and 0.27, respectively. High NLR was associated with worse OS (median survival time: high NLR group 9 vs low NLR group 19 months, HR 1.842, 95% CI: 1.457–2.329, P<0.001). Elevated PLR was negatively correlated with OS (8 vs 18 months, HR 1.677, 95% CI: 1.302–2.161, P<0.001). Patients in high MLR group had a worse OS (10 vs 21 months, HR 1.626, 95% CI: 1.291–2.048, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, NLR, LDH, ALP and portal vein involvement were independent prognostic factors for OS of HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. In addition, for patients in BCLC stage A and B, higher NLR, PLR and MLR were all significantly negatively correlated to median survival time (NLR: 17 vs 26 months, HR: 1.739 (95% CI: 1.279–2.365), P<0.001; PLR: 18 vs 26 months, HR: 1.681 (95% CI: 1.245–2.271), P=0.001; MLR: 20 vs 26 months, HR: 1.589 (95% CI: 1.185–2.129), P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Elevated pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were associated with worse survival time in HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. Among them, NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Dove 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7520139/ /pubmed/33061563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934 Text en © 2020 Guo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Guo, Linghong
Ren, Honghong
Pu, Lutong
Zhu, Xingyu
Liu, Yin
Ma, Xuelei
The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
title_sort prognostic value of inflammation factors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments: a retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934
work_keys_str_mv AT guolinghong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT renhonghong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT pulutong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT zhuxingyu theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT liuyin theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT maxuelei theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT guolinghong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT renhonghong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT pulutong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT zhuxingyu prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT liuyin prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy
AT maxuelei prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy