Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study
BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte rati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934 |
_version_ | 1783587719444692992 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Linghong Ren, Honghong Pu, Lutong Zhu, Xingyu Liu, Yin Ma, Xuelei |
author_facet | Guo, Linghong Ren, Honghong Pu, Lutong Zhu, Xingyu Liu, Yin Ma, Xuelei |
author_sort | Guo, Linghong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments. METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatic artery interventional therapy after being diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2014 were enrolled. Pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were calculated, and all factors including gender, age, TNM stage, BCLC staging, inflammation factors, LDH, ALP, CEA, AFP, hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, portal vein involvement, surgical history and hepatic artery interventional treatment on overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 407 patients were included. The optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for NLR, PLR and MLR were 3.82, 140.00 and 0.27, respectively. High NLR was associated with worse OS (median survival time: high NLR group 9 vs low NLR group 19 months, HR 1.842, 95% CI: 1.457–2.329, P<0.001). Elevated PLR was negatively correlated with OS (8 vs 18 months, HR 1.677, 95% CI: 1.302–2.161, P<0.001). Patients in high MLR group had a worse OS (10 vs 21 months, HR 1.626, 95% CI: 1.291–2.048, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, NLR, LDH, ALP and portal vein involvement were independent prognostic factors for OS of HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. In addition, for patients in BCLC stage A and B, higher NLR, PLR and MLR were all significantly negatively correlated to median survival time (NLR: 17 vs 26 months, HR: 1.739 (95% CI: 1.279–2.365), P<0.001; PLR: 18 vs 26 months, HR: 1.681 (95% CI: 1.245–2.271), P=0.001; MLR: 20 vs 26 months, HR: 1.589 (95% CI: 1.185–2.129), P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Elevated pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were associated with worse survival time in HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. Among them, NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7520139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75201392020-10-14 The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study Guo, Linghong Ren, Honghong Pu, Lutong Zhu, Xingyu Liu, Yin Ma, Xuelei Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery interventional therapy has been recognized as the first choice for advanced liver cancer. However, reliable prognostic markers are still lacking. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation factors including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments. METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatic artery interventional therapy after being diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2014 were enrolled. Pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were calculated, and all factors including gender, age, TNM stage, BCLC staging, inflammation factors, LDH, ALP, CEA, AFP, hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, portal vein involvement, surgical history and hepatic artery interventional treatment on overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 407 patients were included. The optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for NLR, PLR and MLR were 3.82, 140.00 and 0.27, respectively. High NLR was associated with worse OS (median survival time: high NLR group 9 vs low NLR group 19 months, HR 1.842, 95% CI: 1.457–2.329, P<0.001). Elevated PLR was negatively correlated with OS (8 vs 18 months, HR 1.677, 95% CI: 1.302–2.161, P<0.001). Patients in high MLR group had a worse OS (10 vs 21 months, HR 1.626, 95% CI: 1.291–2.048, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, NLR, LDH, ALP and portal vein involvement were independent prognostic factors for OS of HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. In addition, for patients in BCLC stage A and B, higher NLR, PLR and MLR were all significantly negatively correlated to median survival time (NLR: 17 vs 26 months, HR: 1.739 (95% CI: 1.279–2.365), P<0.001; PLR: 18 vs 26 months, HR: 1.681 (95% CI: 1.245–2.271), P=0.001; MLR: 20 vs 26 months, HR: 1.589 (95% CI: 1.185–2.129), P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Elevated pre-treatment NLR, PLR and MLR were associated with worse survival time in HCC patients after hepatic artery interventional therapy. Among them, NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Dove 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7520139/ /pubmed/33061563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934 Text en © 2020 Guo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Guo, Linghong Ren, Honghong Pu, Lutong Zhu, Xingyu Liu, Yin Ma, Xuelei The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title | The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of Inflammation Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatic Artery Interventional Treatments: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | prognostic value of inflammation factors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic artery interventional treatments: a retrospective study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S257934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guolinghong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT renhonghong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT pulutong theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT zhuxingyu theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT liuyin theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT maxuelei theprognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT guolinghong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT renhonghong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT pulutong prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT zhuxingyu prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT liuyin prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy AT maxuelei prognosticvalueofinflammationfactorsinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithhepaticarteryinterventionaltreatmentsaretrospectivestudy |