Cargando…

Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial

PURPOSE: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an established analgesic technique for breast surgery although it is technically challenging. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) requires less technical expertise and may be an alternative to TPVB. However, whether ESPB has similar analgesic effects to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Yuki, Sakura, Shinichi, Tsuchiya, Ritsuko, Wittayapairoj, Aumjit, Saito, Yoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061552
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S265015
_version_ 1783587720393654272
author Aoyama, Yuki
Sakura, Shinichi
Tsuchiya, Ritsuko
Wittayapairoj, Aumjit
Saito, Yoji
author_facet Aoyama, Yuki
Sakura, Shinichi
Tsuchiya, Ritsuko
Wittayapairoj, Aumjit
Saito, Yoji
author_sort Aoyama, Yuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an established analgesic technique for breast surgery although it is technically challenging. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) requires less technical expertise and may be an alternative to TPVB. However, whether ESPB has similar analgesic effects to TPVB for breast surgery is still inconclusive. Moreover, information on sensory blockade of ESPB is scarce. Accordingly, we conducted this retrospective propensity-matched study to see if ESPB could provide comparable analgesic effects to TPVB in patients undergoing breast surgery. We also compared cutaneous sensory block levels after the two techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data saved in our database and compared the two techniques using a propensity matching method. The data of patients who underwent unilateral breast surgery under general anesthesia with the addition of either TPVB or ESPB were identified. We considered that the analgesic efficacy of ESPB was noninferior to TPVB if both postoperative fentanyl consumption and area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores within 24 h were within 50 µg and 240 mm・h margins, respectively. Cutaneous sensory block levels, additional analgesic requirements, and complications were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 93 patients, 30 patients for each group were matched. Both postoperative fentanyl consumption and AUC for pain scores after ESPB were noninferior to those after TPVB. ESPB did not produce sensory blockade consistently, and the number of dermatomes was smaller after ESPB [1 (0–3)] [median (interquartile range)] than after TPVB [4 (2–5)] (P=0.002). No serious complications related to blocks were observed. CONCLUSION: ESPB and TPVB provided comparable postoperative analgesia for 24 h in patients undergoing breast surgery. Dermatomal sensory blockade was, however, less apparent and narrower after ESPB than after TPVB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75201432020-10-14 Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial Aoyama, Yuki Sakura, Shinichi Tsuchiya, Ritsuko Wittayapairoj, Aumjit Saito, Yoji J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an established analgesic technique for breast surgery although it is technically challenging. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) requires less technical expertise and may be an alternative to TPVB. However, whether ESPB has similar analgesic effects to TPVB for breast surgery is still inconclusive. Moreover, information on sensory blockade of ESPB is scarce. Accordingly, we conducted this retrospective propensity-matched study to see if ESPB could provide comparable analgesic effects to TPVB in patients undergoing breast surgery. We also compared cutaneous sensory block levels after the two techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data saved in our database and compared the two techniques using a propensity matching method. The data of patients who underwent unilateral breast surgery under general anesthesia with the addition of either TPVB or ESPB were identified. We considered that the analgesic efficacy of ESPB was noninferior to TPVB if both postoperative fentanyl consumption and area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores within 24 h were within 50 µg and 240 mm・h margins, respectively. Cutaneous sensory block levels, additional analgesic requirements, and complications were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 93 patients, 30 patients for each group were matched. Both postoperative fentanyl consumption and AUC for pain scores after ESPB were noninferior to those after TPVB. ESPB did not produce sensory blockade consistently, and the number of dermatomes was smaller after ESPB [1 (0–3)] [median (interquartile range)] than after TPVB [4 (2–5)] (P=0.002). No serious complications related to blocks were observed. CONCLUSION: ESPB and TPVB provided comparable postoperative analgesia for 24 h in patients undergoing breast surgery. Dermatomal sensory blockade was, however, less apparent and narrower after ESPB than after TPVB. Dove 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7520143/ /pubmed/33061552 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S265015 Text en © 2020 Aoyama et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Aoyama, Yuki
Sakura, Shinichi
Tsuchiya, Ritsuko
Wittayapairoj, Aumjit
Saito, Yoji
Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title_full Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title_short Erector Spinae Plane Block and Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Noninferiority Trial
title_sort erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block for breast surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched noninferiority trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061552
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S265015
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamayuki erectorspinaeplaneblockandparavertebralblockforbreastsurgeryaretrospectivepropensitymatchednoninferioritytrial
AT sakurashinichi erectorspinaeplaneblockandparavertebralblockforbreastsurgeryaretrospectivepropensitymatchednoninferioritytrial
AT tsuchiyaritsuko erectorspinaeplaneblockandparavertebralblockforbreastsurgeryaretrospectivepropensitymatchednoninferioritytrial
AT wittayapairojaumjit erectorspinaeplaneblockandparavertebralblockforbreastsurgeryaretrospectivepropensitymatchednoninferioritytrial
AT saitoyoji erectorspinaeplaneblockandparavertebralblockforbreastsurgeryaretrospectivepropensitymatchednoninferioritytrial