Cargando…

Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity

1. Land management is known to have consequences for biodiversity; however, our synthetic understanding of its effects is limited due to highly variable results across studies, which vary in the focal taxa and spatial grain considered, as well as the response variables reported. Such synthetic knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slabbert, Eleonore L., Schweiger, Oliver, Wubet, Tesfaye, Kautzner, Antje, Baessler, Cornelia, Auge, Harald, Roscher, Christiane, Knight, Tiffany M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6675
_version_ 1783587738075791360
author Slabbert, Eleonore L.
Schweiger, Oliver
Wubet, Tesfaye
Kautzner, Antje
Baessler, Cornelia
Auge, Harald
Roscher, Christiane
Knight, Tiffany M.
author_facet Slabbert, Eleonore L.
Schweiger, Oliver
Wubet, Tesfaye
Kautzner, Antje
Baessler, Cornelia
Auge, Harald
Roscher, Christiane
Knight, Tiffany M.
author_sort Slabbert, Eleonore L.
collection PubMed
description 1. Land management is known to have consequences for biodiversity; however, our synthetic understanding of its effects is limited due to highly variable results across studies, which vary in the focal taxa and spatial grain considered, as well as the response variables reported. Such synthetic knowledge is necessary for management of agroecosystems for high diversity and function. 2. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the importance of scale‐dependent effects of land management (LM) (pastures vs. meadows), on plant and soil microbe diversity (fungi and bacteria) across 5 study sites in Central Germany. Analyses included diversity partitioning of species richness and related biodiversity components (i.e., density of individuals, species‐abundance distribution, and spatial aggregation) at two spatial grains (α‐ and γ‐scale, 1 m(2) and 16 km(2), respectively). 3. Our results show scale‐dependent patterns in response to LM to be the norm rather than the exception and highlight the importance of measuring species richness and its underlying components at multiple spatial grains. 4. Our outcomes provide new insight to the complexity of scale‐dependent responses within and across taxonomic groups. They suggest that, despite close associations between taxa, LM responses are not easily extrapolated across multiple spatial grains and taxa. Responses of biodiversity to LM are often driven by changes to evenness and spatial aggregation, rather than by changes in individual density. High‐site specificity of LM effects might be due to a variety of context‐specific factors, such as historic land management, identity of grazers, and grazing regime. 5. Synthesis and applications: Our results suggest that links between taxa are not necessarily strong enough to allow for generalization of biodiversity patterns. These findings highlight the importance of considering multiple taxa and spatial grains when investigating LM responses, while promoting management practices that do the same and are tailored to local and regional conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75202182020-09-30 Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity Slabbert, Eleonore L. Schweiger, Oliver Wubet, Tesfaye Kautzner, Antje Baessler, Cornelia Auge, Harald Roscher, Christiane Knight, Tiffany M. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Land management is known to have consequences for biodiversity; however, our synthetic understanding of its effects is limited due to highly variable results across studies, which vary in the focal taxa and spatial grain considered, as well as the response variables reported. Such synthetic knowledge is necessary for management of agroecosystems for high diversity and function. 2. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the importance of scale‐dependent effects of land management (LM) (pastures vs. meadows), on plant and soil microbe diversity (fungi and bacteria) across 5 study sites in Central Germany. Analyses included diversity partitioning of species richness and related biodiversity components (i.e., density of individuals, species‐abundance distribution, and spatial aggregation) at two spatial grains (α‐ and γ‐scale, 1 m(2) and 16 km(2), respectively). 3. Our results show scale‐dependent patterns in response to LM to be the norm rather than the exception and highlight the importance of measuring species richness and its underlying components at multiple spatial grains. 4. Our outcomes provide new insight to the complexity of scale‐dependent responses within and across taxonomic groups. They suggest that, despite close associations between taxa, LM responses are not easily extrapolated across multiple spatial grains and taxa. Responses of biodiversity to LM are often driven by changes to evenness and spatial aggregation, rather than by changes in individual density. High‐site specificity of LM effects might be due to a variety of context‐specific factors, such as historic land management, identity of grazers, and grazing regime. 5. Synthesis and applications: Our results suggest that links between taxa are not necessarily strong enough to allow for generalization of biodiversity patterns. These findings highlight the importance of considering multiple taxa and spatial grains when investigating LM responses, while promoting management practices that do the same and are tailored to local and regional conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7520218/ /pubmed/33005370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6675 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Slabbert, Eleonore L.
Schweiger, Oliver
Wubet, Tesfaye
Kautzner, Antje
Baessler, Cornelia
Auge, Harald
Roscher, Christiane
Knight, Tiffany M.
Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title_full Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title_fullStr Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title_short Scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
title_sort scale‐dependent impact of land management on above‐ and belowground biodiversity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6675
work_keys_str_mv AT slabberteleonorel scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT schweigeroliver scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT wubettesfaye scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT kautznerantje scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT baesslercornelia scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT augeharald scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT roscherchristiane scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity
AT knighttiffanym scaledependentimpactoflandmanagementonaboveandbelowgroundbiodiversity