Cargando…

Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing

Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) is an endemic cichlid in Tanzania. In addition to its importance for biodiversity conservation, Rufiji tilapia is also attractive for farming due to its high growth rate, salinity tolerance, and the production of all‐male hybrids when crossed with Nile...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyinondi, Christer S., Mtolera, Matern S. P., Mmochi, Aviti J., Lopes Pinto, Fernando A., Houston, Ross D., de Koning, Dirk J., Palaiokostas, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6664
_version_ 1783587739496611840
author Nyinondi, Christer S.
Mtolera, Matern S. P.
Mmochi, Aviti J.
Lopes Pinto, Fernando A.
Houston, Ross D.
de Koning, Dirk J.
Palaiokostas, Christos
author_facet Nyinondi, Christer S.
Mtolera, Matern S. P.
Mmochi, Aviti J.
Lopes Pinto, Fernando A.
Houston, Ross D.
de Koning, Dirk J.
Palaiokostas, Christos
author_sort Nyinondi, Christer S.
collection PubMed
description Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) is an endemic cichlid in Tanzania. In addition to its importance for biodiversity conservation, Rufiji tilapia is also attractive for farming due to its high growth rate, salinity tolerance, and the production of all‐male hybrids when crossed with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The aim of the current study was to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of both wild and farmed Rufiji tilapia populations in order to inform conservation and aquaculture practices. Double‐digest restriction‐site‐associated DNA (ddRAD) libraries were constructed from 195 animals originating from eight wild (Nyamisati, Utete, Mansi, Mindu, Wami, Ruaha, Kibasira, and Kilola) and two farmed (Bwawani and Chemchem) populations. The identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; n = 2,182) were used to investigate the genetic variation within and among the studied populations. Genetic distance estimates (F (st)) were low among populations from neighboring locations, with the exception of Utete and Chemchem populations (F (st) = 0.34). Isolation‐by‐distance (IBD) analysis among the wild populations did not detect any significant correlation signal (r = .05; p‐value = .4) between the genetic distance and the sampling (Euclidean distance) locations. Population structure and putative ancestry were further investigated using both Bayesian (Structure) and multivariate approaches (discriminant analysis of principal components). Both analysis indicated the existence of three distinct genetic clusters. Two cross‐validation scenarios were conducted in order to test the efficiency of the SNP dataset for discriminating between farmed and wild animals or predicting the population of origin. Approximately 95% of the test dataset was correctly classified in the first scenario, while in the case of predicting for the population of origin 68% of the test dataset was correctly classified. Overall, our results provide novel insights regarding the population structure of Rufiji tilapia and a new database of informative SNP markers for both conservation management and aquaculture activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75202242020-09-30 Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing Nyinondi, Christer S. Mtolera, Matern S. P. Mmochi, Aviti J. Lopes Pinto, Fernando A. Houston, Ross D. de Koning, Dirk J. Palaiokostas, Christos Ecol Evol Original Research Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) is an endemic cichlid in Tanzania. In addition to its importance for biodiversity conservation, Rufiji tilapia is also attractive for farming due to its high growth rate, salinity tolerance, and the production of all‐male hybrids when crossed with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The aim of the current study was to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of both wild and farmed Rufiji tilapia populations in order to inform conservation and aquaculture practices. Double‐digest restriction‐site‐associated DNA (ddRAD) libraries were constructed from 195 animals originating from eight wild (Nyamisati, Utete, Mansi, Mindu, Wami, Ruaha, Kibasira, and Kilola) and two farmed (Bwawani and Chemchem) populations. The identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; n = 2,182) were used to investigate the genetic variation within and among the studied populations. Genetic distance estimates (F (st)) were low among populations from neighboring locations, with the exception of Utete and Chemchem populations (F (st) = 0.34). Isolation‐by‐distance (IBD) analysis among the wild populations did not detect any significant correlation signal (r = .05; p‐value = .4) between the genetic distance and the sampling (Euclidean distance) locations. Population structure and putative ancestry were further investigated using both Bayesian (Structure) and multivariate approaches (discriminant analysis of principal components). Both analysis indicated the existence of three distinct genetic clusters. Two cross‐validation scenarios were conducted in order to test the efficiency of the SNP dataset for discriminating between farmed and wild animals or predicting the population of origin. Approximately 95% of the test dataset was correctly classified in the first scenario, while in the case of predicting for the population of origin 68% of the test dataset was correctly classified. Overall, our results provide novel insights regarding the population structure of Rufiji tilapia and a new database of informative SNP markers for both conservation management and aquaculture activities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7520224/ /pubmed/33005362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6664 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nyinondi, Christer S.
Mtolera, Matern S. P.
Mmochi, Aviti J.
Lopes Pinto, Fernando A.
Houston, Ross D.
de Koning, Dirk J.
Palaiokostas, Christos
Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title_full Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title_fullStr Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title_short Assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild Rufiji tilapia (Oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddRAD sequencing
title_sort assessing the genetic diversity of farmed and wild rufiji tilapia (oreochromis urolepis urolepis) populations using ddrad sequencing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6664
work_keys_str_mv AT nyinondichristers assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT mtoleramaternsp assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT mmochiavitij assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT lopespintofernandoa assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT houstonrossd assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT dekoningdirkj assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing
AT palaiokostaschristos assessingthegeneticdiversityoffarmedandwildrufijitilapiaoreochromisurolepisurolepispopulationsusingddradsequencing