Cargando…

Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on patient outcomes, and found which patients should be considered for MRCP before cholecystectomy. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 2,072 patients that underwent cholecystectomy for be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Kyung A, Kwon, Heon-Ju, Ham, Soo-Youn, Park, Hee Jin, Shin, Jun Ho, Lee, Sung Ryol, Kim, Mi Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.4.221
_version_ 1783587740481224704
author Kang, Kyung A
Kwon, Heon-Ju
Ham, Soo-Youn
Park, Hee Jin
Shin, Jun Ho
Lee, Sung Ryol
Kim, Mi Sung
author_facet Kang, Kyung A
Kwon, Heon-Ju
Ham, Soo-Youn
Park, Hee Jin
Shin, Jun Ho
Lee, Sung Ryol
Kim, Mi Sung
author_sort Kang, Kyung A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on patient outcomes, and found which patients should be considered for MRCP before cholecystectomy. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 2,072 patients that underwent cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease from January 2014 to June 2017. Patients were grouped as CT only group (n = 737) and MRCP group (n = 1,335), including both CT and MRCP (n = 1,292) or MRCP only (n = 43). The main outcome measure was associated with complications after cholecystectomy, and the secondary outcomes were hospital stay, readmission, and events that could impact patient management due to addition of MRCP. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications or readmission rate between the 2 groups. Hospital stay was about 0.6 days longer in the MRCP group. However, MRCP group was more susceptible to complications due to underlying patient demographics (older age, higher frequency of diabetes, and higher level of the inflammatory markers). MRCP diagnosed common bile duct (CBD) stones in 6.5% of patients (84/1,292) without CBD stones in CT, and bile duct anomalies were identified in 41 patients (3.2%). Elevated γ-GT was the only independent factor for additional detection of CBD stones (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.89; P = 0.029) and subsequent biliary procedures (adjusted OR, 3.34; P = 0.018) when additional MRCP was performed. CONCLUSION: MRCP is valuable for identification of bile duct variation and CBD stones. Preoperative MRCP can be considered, particularly in patients with elevated γ-GT, for proper preoperative management and avoidance of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75202292020-10-06 Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered? Kang, Kyung A Kwon, Heon-Ju Ham, Soo-Youn Park, Hee Jin Shin, Jun Ho Lee, Sung Ryol Kim, Mi Sung Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on patient outcomes, and found which patients should be considered for MRCP before cholecystectomy. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 2,072 patients that underwent cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease from January 2014 to June 2017. Patients were grouped as CT only group (n = 737) and MRCP group (n = 1,335), including both CT and MRCP (n = 1,292) or MRCP only (n = 43). The main outcome measure was associated with complications after cholecystectomy, and the secondary outcomes were hospital stay, readmission, and events that could impact patient management due to addition of MRCP. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications or readmission rate between the 2 groups. Hospital stay was about 0.6 days longer in the MRCP group. However, MRCP group was more susceptible to complications due to underlying patient demographics (older age, higher frequency of diabetes, and higher level of the inflammatory markers). MRCP diagnosed common bile duct (CBD) stones in 6.5% of patients (84/1,292) without CBD stones in CT, and bile duct anomalies were identified in 41 patients (3.2%). Elevated γ-GT was the only independent factor for additional detection of CBD stones (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.89; P = 0.029) and subsequent biliary procedures (adjusted OR, 3.34; P = 0.018) when additional MRCP was performed. CONCLUSION: MRCP is valuable for identification of bile duct variation and CBD stones. Preoperative MRCP can be considered, particularly in patients with elevated γ-GT, for proper preoperative management and avoidance of complications. The Korean Surgical Society 2020-10 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7520229/ /pubmed/33029481 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.4.221 Text en Copyright © 2020, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Kyung A
Kwon, Heon-Ju
Ham, Soo-Youn
Park, Hee Jin
Shin, Jun Ho
Lee, Sung Ryol
Kim, Mi Sung
Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title_full Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title_fullStr Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title_full_unstemmed Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title_short Impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
title_sort impacts on outcomes and management of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for whom it should be considered?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.4.221
work_keys_str_mv AT kangkyunga impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT kwonheonju impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT hamsooyoun impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT parkheejin impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT shinjunho impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT leesungryol impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered
AT kimmisung impactsonoutcomesandmanagementofpreoperativemagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinpatientsscheduledforlaparoscopiccholecystectomyforwhomitshouldbeconsidered