Cargando…
Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to present the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) in clinical pelvic lymph node‐positive prostate cancer (cN1) patients. We also analyze the prognostic factors with focus on RT dose escalation to metastatic lymph nodes (LN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2985 |
_version_ | 1783587755050139648 |
---|---|
author | Tsuchida, Keisuke Inaba, Koji Kashihara, Tairo Murakami, Naoya Okuma, Kae Takahashi, Kana Igaki, Hiroshi Nakayama, Yuko Maejima, Aiko Shinoda, Yasuo Matsui, Yoshiyuki Komiyama, Motokiyo Fujimoto, Hiroyuki Ito, Yoshinori Sumi, Minako Nakano, Takashi Itami, Jun |
author_facet | Tsuchida, Keisuke Inaba, Koji Kashihara, Tairo Murakami, Naoya Okuma, Kae Takahashi, Kana Igaki, Hiroshi Nakayama, Yuko Maejima, Aiko Shinoda, Yasuo Matsui, Yoshiyuki Komiyama, Motokiyo Fujimoto, Hiroyuki Ito, Yoshinori Sumi, Minako Nakano, Takashi Itami, Jun |
author_sort | Tsuchida, Keisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to present the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) in clinical pelvic lymph node‐positive prostate cancer (cN1) patients. We also analyze the prognostic factors with focus on RT dose escalation to metastatic lymph nodes (LN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from cN1 patients who were treated with definitive RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between June 2004 and February 2016. All patients received localized irradiation to the prostate region and whole pelvis irradiation. Some patients received intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with RT dose escalation to metastatic LN. Univariate analyses using log‐rank test were performed to find prognostic factors between patient subgroups. RESULTS: Fifty‐one consecutive patients were identified. The median follow‐up period for all patients was 88 (range 20‐157) months. Primary Gleason pattern and LN RT dose were statistically significant prognostic factors for relapse‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). Especially, RT dose escalation (60 Gy or more) to metastatic LN significantly improved RFS and DMFS compared with standard dose RT (4‐year RFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year RFS 90.6% vs 58.0%, P = .015; 4‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 62.8%, P = .023). The following factors were all statistically significant for biochemical relapse‐free survival (BRFS): T stage, LN RT dose, local RT dose, and ADT duration period. Any significantly different toxicity was not seen for each LN or local RT dose except for the incident rate of grade 2 or more acute urinary retention, which was significantly higher in the higher LN RT dose (60 Gy or more) group by the Chi‐square test. CONCLUSIONS: RT dose escalation to metastatic LN in cN1 patients improves BRFS, RFS, and DMFS at 4 and 7 years, without increasing severe adverse events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7520291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75202912020-09-30 Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer Tsuchida, Keisuke Inaba, Koji Kashihara, Tairo Murakami, Naoya Okuma, Kae Takahashi, Kana Igaki, Hiroshi Nakayama, Yuko Maejima, Aiko Shinoda, Yasuo Matsui, Yoshiyuki Komiyama, Motokiyo Fujimoto, Hiroyuki Ito, Yoshinori Sumi, Minako Nakano, Takashi Itami, Jun Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to present the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) in clinical pelvic lymph node‐positive prostate cancer (cN1) patients. We also analyze the prognostic factors with focus on RT dose escalation to metastatic lymph nodes (LN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from cN1 patients who were treated with definitive RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between June 2004 and February 2016. All patients received localized irradiation to the prostate region and whole pelvis irradiation. Some patients received intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with RT dose escalation to metastatic LN. Univariate analyses using log‐rank test were performed to find prognostic factors between patient subgroups. RESULTS: Fifty‐one consecutive patients were identified. The median follow‐up period for all patients was 88 (range 20‐157) months. Primary Gleason pattern and LN RT dose were statistically significant prognostic factors for relapse‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). Especially, RT dose escalation (60 Gy or more) to metastatic LN significantly improved RFS and DMFS compared with standard dose RT (4‐year RFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year RFS 90.6% vs 58.0%, P = .015; 4‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 82.1%, 7‐year DMFS 90.6% vs 62.8%, P = .023). The following factors were all statistically significant for biochemical relapse‐free survival (BRFS): T stage, LN RT dose, local RT dose, and ADT duration period. Any significantly different toxicity was not seen for each LN or local RT dose except for the incident rate of grade 2 or more acute urinary retention, which was significantly higher in the higher LN RT dose (60 Gy or more) group by the Chi‐square test. CONCLUSIONS: RT dose escalation to metastatic LN in cN1 patients improves BRFS, RFS, and DMFS at 4 and 7 years, without increasing severe adverse events. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7520291/ /pubmed/32750234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2985 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Tsuchida, Keisuke Inaba, Koji Kashihara, Tairo Murakami, Naoya Okuma, Kae Takahashi, Kana Igaki, Hiroshi Nakayama, Yuko Maejima, Aiko Shinoda, Yasuo Matsui, Yoshiyuki Komiyama, Motokiyo Fujimoto, Hiroyuki Ito, Yoshinori Sumi, Minako Nakano, Takashi Itami, Jun Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title | Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title_full | Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title_short | Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsuchidakeisuke clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT inabakoji clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT kashiharatairo clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT murakaminaoya clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT okumakae clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT takahashikana clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT igakihiroshi clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT nakayamayuko clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT maejimaaiko clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT shinodayasuo clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT matsuiyoshiyuki clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT komiyamamotokiyo clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT fujimotohiroyuki clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT itoyoshinori clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT sumiminako clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT nakanotakashi clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer AT itamijun clinicaloutcomesofdefinitivewholepelvicradiotherapyforclinicallymphnodemetastaticprostatecancer |