Cargando…

Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country

Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) is the current standard of care for treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), however bladder preservation by offering radical radiotherapy (RT) is gaining interest for improving the quality of life while maintaining a reasonable oncological outcome. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiaz, Shaukat, Ali, Azfar, Adnan, Siddique, Khalil, Muhammad Arshad Irshad, Rasheed, Yasir, Abu Bakar, Muhammad, Ahmad Cheema, Zubair, Mir, Khurram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999780
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10057
_version_ 1783587777872396288
author Fiaz, Shaukat
Ali, Azfar
Adnan, Siddique
Khalil, Muhammad Arshad Irshad
Rasheed, Yasir
Abu Bakar, Muhammad
Ahmad Cheema, Zubair
Mir, Khurram
author_facet Fiaz, Shaukat
Ali, Azfar
Adnan, Siddique
Khalil, Muhammad Arshad Irshad
Rasheed, Yasir
Abu Bakar, Muhammad
Ahmad Cheema, Zubair
Mir, Khurram
author_sort Fiaz, Shaukat
collection PubMed
description Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) is the current standard of care for treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), however bladder preservation by offering radical radiotherapy (RT) is gaining interest for improving the quality of life while maintaining a reasonable oncological outcome. In this study, we have compared outcomes of the two treatment options. Materials and methods This is a 10-year retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were treated for histologically proven muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the department of uro-oncology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre from January 2005 to January 2015. Data was analysed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS), version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The primary end point of our study was to calculate the three- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 230 patients were included in the study with male gender predominating (88%). The mean and standard deviation for age was 58.32+11.128. Radical cystectomy was performed in 119 patients while 111 received RT. Clinically, 34% had stage 2 disease, while 66 % had stage 3 cancer. The median follow-up duration was 41 months (range: 2-155). During follow-up 57.4% of patients showed no recurrence. Local recurrence was found in 9.6% patients and distant metastasis in 32.2%. The three-year DFS of RC was 63% and that of RT was 57% while the five-year DFS for RC and RT were 60% and 49%, respectively (p=0.196). The three-year OS of RC was 64% and that for RT was 58%. On further analysis the five-year OS of RC was 53% and that for RT was 50% (p=0.98). Upon stage-based comparisons, we found no statistically significant difference between the three- and five-year DFS and OS of stage 2 and stage 3 when treated with either modality. Conclusion Most studies favor RC and consider it as the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder tumor treatment. The current study reveals that bladder preservation approach by chemo radiotherapy is a viable treatment option, having comparable oncological outcomes with patients receiving radical cystectomy, and can be offered to patients having muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75203992020-09-29 Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country Fiaz, Shaukat Ali, Azfar Adnan, Siddique Khalil, Muhammad Arshad Irshad Rasheed, Yasir Abu Bakar, Muhammad Ahmad Cheema, Zubair Mir, Khurram Cureus Urology Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) is the current standard of care for treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), however bladder preservation by offering radical radiotherapy (RT) is gaining interest for improving the quality of life while maintaining a reasonable oncological outcome. In this study, we have compared outcomes of the two treatment options. Materials and methods This is a 10-year retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were treated for histologically proven muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the department of uro-oncology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre from January 2005 to January 2015. Data was analysed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS), version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The primary end point of our study was to calculate the three- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 230 patients were included in the study with male gender predominating (88%). The mean and standard deviation for age was 58.32+11.128. Radical cystectomy was performed in 119 patients while 111 received RT. Clinically, 34% had stage 2 disease, while 66 % had stage 3 cancer. The median follow-up duration was 41 months (range: 2-155). During follow-up 57.4% of patients showed no recurrence. Local recurrence was found in 9.6% patients and distant metastasis in 32.2%. The three-year DFS of RC was 63% and that of RT was 57% while the five-year DFS for RC and RT were 60% and 49%, respectively (p=0.196). The three-year OS of RC was 64% and that for RT was 58%. On further analysis the five-year OS of RC was 53% and that for RT was 50% (p=0.98). Upon stage-based comparisons, we found no statistically significant difference between the three- and five-year DFS and OS of stage 2 and stage 3 when treated with either modality. Conclusion Most studies favor RC and consider it as the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder tumor treatment. The current study reveals that bladder preservation approach by chemo radiotherapy is a viable treatment option, having comparable oncological outcomes with patients receiving radical cystectomy, and can be offered to patients having muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Cureus 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7520399/ /pubmed/32999780 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10057 Text en Copyright © 2020, Fiaz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Fiaz, Shaukat
Ali, Azfar
Adnan, Siddique
Khalil, Muhammad Arshad Irshad
Rasheed, Yasir
Abu Bakar, Muhammad
Ahmad Cheema, Zubair
Mir, Khurram
Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title_full Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title_fullStr Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title_short Comparison of Outcomes Between Radical Radiotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Cancer Specialized Unit of a Developing Country
title_sort comparison of outcomes between radical radiotherapy and radical cystectomy in muscle invasive bladder cancer in a cancer specialized unit of a developing country
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999780
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10057
work_keys_str_mv AT fiazshaukat comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT aliazfar comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT adnansiddique comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT khalilmuhammadarshadirshad comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT rasheedyasir comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT abubakarmuhammad comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT ahmadcheemazubair comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry
AT mirkhurram comparisonofoutcomesbetweenradicalradiotherapyandradicalcystectomyinmuscleinvasivebladdercancerinacancerspecializedunitofadevelopingcountry