Cargando…

Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients

Patients with incurable lung cancer often present with debilitating symptoms that require urgent palliative radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provides several dosimetric advantages compared to basic non-conformal techniques, but involves complex planning resulting in a slower tur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mak, David Y, Fraser, Ian, Ferris, Robynn, James, Kerry, Liu, Mitchell, Thomas, Steven D, McKenzie, Michael, Lefresne, Shilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999778
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10055
_version_ 1783587778559213568
author Mak, David Y
Fraser, Ian
Ferris, Robynn
James, Kerry
Liu, Mitchell
Thomas, Steven D
McKenzie, Michael
Lefresne, Shilo
author_facet Mak, David Y
Fraser, Ian
Ferris, Robynn
James, Kerry
Liu, Mitchell
Thomas, Steven D
McKenzie, Michael
Lefresne, Shilo
author_sort Mak, David Y
collection PubMed
description Patients with incurable lung cancer often present with debilitating symptoms that require urgent palliative radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provides several dosimetric advantages compared to basic non-conformal techniques, but involves complex planning resulting in a slower turn-around time for treatment. A simplified planning technique known as ‘rapid VMAT’ was developed with an aim to deliver palliative treatment to patients within 48 hours. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the dosimetric quality of rapid VMAT plans to standard VMAT plans. Fourteen consecutive rapid VMAT cases were re-planned de novo as per standard VMAT planning guidelines. Planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were then compared. PTV coverage and dose to OARs including the spinal canal, lung, heart, and esophagus were similar between rapid and standard VMAT. Each plan was ready for treatment within 48 hours of the CT simulation. This study describes an expedited process for which palliative radiotherapy can be delivered to lung tumors with a similar robust quality that is provided for curative intent VMAT radiotherapy plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75204022020-09-29 Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients Mak, David Y Fraser, Ian Ferris, Robynn James, Kerry Liu, Mitchell Thomas, Steven D McKenzie, Michael Lefresne, Shilo Cureus Radiation Oncology Patients with incurable lung cancer often present with debilitating symptoms that require urgent palliative radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provides several dosimetric advantages compared to basic non-conformal techniques, but involves complex planning resulting in a slower turn-around time for treatment. A simplified planning technique known as ‘rapid VMAT’ was developed with an aim to deliver palliative treatment to patients within 48 hours. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the dosimetric quality of rapid VMAT plans to standard VMAT plans. Fourteen consecutive rapid VMAT cases were re-planned de novo as per standard VMAT planning guidelines. Planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were then compared. PTV coverage and dose to OARs including the spinal canal, lung, heart, and esophagus were similar between rapid and standard VMAT. Each plan was ready for treatment within 48 hours of the CT simulation. This study describes an expedited process for which palliative radiotherapy can be delivered to lung tumors with a similar robust quality that is provided for curative intent VMAT radiotherapy plans. Cureus 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7520402/ /pubmed/32999778 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10055 Text en Copyright © 2020, Mak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Mak, David Y
Fraser, Ian
Ferris, Robynn
James, Kerry
Liu, Mitchell
Thomas, Steven D
McKenzie, Michael
Lefresne, Shilo
Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title_full Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title_short Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients
title_sort comparison of rapid to standard volumetric modulated arc therapy for palliative radiotherapy in lung cancer patients
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999778
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10055
work_keys_str_mv AT makdavidy comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT fraserian comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT ferrisrobynn comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT jameskerry comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT liumitchell comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT thomasstevend comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT mckenziemichael comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients
AT lefresneshilo comparisonofrapidtostandardvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpalliativeradiotherapyinlungcancerpatients