Cargando…
Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women
BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a normal component of the gastrointestinal and genital microbiota in humans and can lead to important infections in newborns. AIM: To compare GBS isolation and identification methods as well as to assess the antibiotic susceptibility and to identify resista...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3988 |
_version_ | 1783587848284274688 |
---|---|
author | Santana, Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes de Oliveira, Tais Viana Ledo Filho, Marcelo Barreto de Souza da Silva, Lucas Santana Coelho de Brito, Breno Bittencourt de Melo, Fabrício Freire Souza, Cláudio Lima Marques, Lucas Miranda Oliveira, Márcio Vasconcelos |
author_facet | Santana, Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes de Oliveira, Tais Viana Ledo Filho, Marcelo Barreto de Souza da Silva, Lucas Santana Coelho de Brito, Breno Bittencourt de Melo, Fabrício Freire Souza, Cláudio Lima Marques, Lucas Miranda Oliveira, Márcio Vasconcelos |
author_sort | Santana, Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a normal component of the gastrointestinal and genital microbiota in humans and can lead to important infections in newborns. AIM: To compare GBS isolation and identification methods as well as to assess the antibiotic susceptibility and to identify resistance genes in GBS strains from pregnant women attended in healthcare services from the city of Vitória da Conquista, in Bahia State, Brazil. METHODS: From January 2017 to February 2018, vaginorectal swabs were obtained from 186 participants and the samples were seeded onto chromogenic agar for GBS before and after inoculation in selective broth. Confirmatory identification using 3 CAMP and latex tests was performed in samples with GBS-suggestive colonies. Then, disk diffusion antibiograms were performed in GBS-positive samples, and the detection of the resistance genes ermB, ermTR, mefA, and linB in the clindamycin and/or erythromycin-resistant samples was carried out. RESULTS: Thirty-two samples (17.2%) were GBS-positive. The culture in chromogenic agar after sample incubation in selective broth was the most sensitive method (96.9%) for GBS detection. All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin. Clindamycin resistance was observed in 6 samples (18.8%), while 8 samples (25%) were erythromycin-resistant. All erythromycin and/or clindamycin-resistant GBS strains had negative D-tests. Two strains (25%) presented an M phenotype and 6 isolates (75%) presented a cMLSB phenotype. The ermB gene was identified in 4 samples (44.4%), the mefA gene was also found in 4 samples (44.4%), the ermTR gene was identified in 1 isolate (11.1%), and the linB gene was not found in any isolate. CONCLUSION: This study evidenced that the screening for SGB can be performed by means of various methods, including chromogenic media, and that the chemoprophylaxis for pregnant women who cannot use penicillin must be susceptibility-guided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7520794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75207942020-10-05 Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women Santana, Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes de Oliveira, Tais Viana Ledo Filho, Marcelo Barreto de Souza da Silva, Lucas Santana Coelho de Brito, Breno Bittencourt de Melo, Fabrício Freire Souza, Cláudio Lima Marques, Lucas Miranda Oliveira, Márcio Vasconcelos World J Clin Cases Clinical and Translational Research BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a normal component of the gastrointestinal and genital microbiota in humans and can lead to important infections in newborns. AIM: To compare GBS isolation and identification methods as well as to assess the antibiotic susceptibility and to identify resistance genes in GBS strains from pregnant women attended in healthcare services from the city of Vitória da Conquista, in Bahia State, Brazil. METHODS: From January 2017 to February 2018, vaginorectal swabs were obtained from 186 participants and the samples were seeded onto chromogenic agar for GBS before and after inoculation in selective broth. Confirmatory identification using 3 CAMP and latex tests was performed in samples with GBS-suggestive colonies. Then, disk diffusion antibiograms were performed in GBS-positive samples, and the detection of the resistance genes ermB, ermTR, mefA, and linB in the clindamycin and/or erythromycin-resistant samples was carried out. RESULTS: Thirty-two samples (17.2%) were GBS-positive. The culture in chromogenic agar after sample incubation in selective broth was the most sensitive method (96.9%) for GBS detection. All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin. Clindamycin resistance was observed in 6 samples (18.8%), while 8 samples (25%) were erythromycin-resistant. All erythromycin and/or clindamycin-resistant GBS strains had negative D-tests. Two strains (25%) presented an M phenotype and 6 isolates (75%) presented a cMLSB phenotype. The ermB gene was identified in 4 samples (44.4%), the mefA gene was also found in 4 samples (44.4%), the ermTR gene was identified in 1 isolate (11.1%), and the linB gene was not found in any isolate. CONCLUSION: This study evidenced that the screening for SGB can be performed by means of various methods, including chromogenic media, and that the chemoprophylaxis for pregnant women who cannot use penicillin must be susceptibility-guided. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-09-26 2020-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7520794/ /pubmed/33024755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3988 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Translational Research Santana, Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes de Oliveira, Tais Viana Ledo Filho, Marcelo Barreto de Souza da Silva, Lucas Santana Coelho de Brito, Breno Bittencourt de Melo, Fabrício Freire Souza, Cláudio Lima Marques, Lucas Miranda Oliveira, Márcio Vasconcelos Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title | Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title_full | Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title_fullStr | Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title_full_unstemmed | Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title_short | Streptococcus agalactiae: Identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
title_sort | streptococcus agalactiae: identification methods, antimicrobial susceptibility, and resistance genes in pregnant women |
topic | Clinical and Translational Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santanafabriciaalmeidafernandes streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT deoliveirataisvianaledo streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT filhomarcelobarretodesouza streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT dasilvalucassantanacoelho streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT debritobrenobittencourt streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT demelofabriciofreire streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT souzaclaudiolima streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT marqueslucasmiranda streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen AT oliveiramarciovasconcelos streptococcusagalactiaeidentificationmethodsantimicrobialsusceptibilityandresistancegenesinpregnantwomen |