Cargando…

Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Rachel, Issa, Eyad, Roberts, Nia, Norman, Robert I, Howick, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471
_version_ 1783587854179368960
author Winter, Rachel
Issa, Eyad
Roberts, Nia
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
author_facet Winter, Rachel
Issa, Eyad
Roberts, Nia
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
author_sort Winter, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in medical and healthcare students and professionals. Studies measuring any aspect of ‘clinical empathy’ as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of the impact of empathy training on participants’ empathy levels were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials were included, with 22 providing adequate data for meta-analysis. An overall moderate effect on participant empathy postintervention (standardised mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67) was found. Heterogeneity across trial results was substantial (I(2)=63%). Data on sustainability of effect was provided by 11 trials and found a moderate effect size for improved empathy up until 12 weeks (0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.15), and a small but statistically significant effect size for sustainability at 12 weeks and beyond (standardised mean difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57). In total, 15 studies were considered to be either unclear or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that empathy-enhancing interventions can be effective at cultivating and sustaining empathy with intervention specifics contributing to effectiveness. This review focuses on an important, growing area of medical education and provides guidance to those looking to develop effective interventions to enhance empathy in the healthcare setting. Further high-quality trials are needed that include patient-led outcome assessments and further evaluate the long-term sustainability of empathy training. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42019126843).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75208262020-10-14 Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials Winter, Rachel Issa, Eyad Roberts, Nia Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in medical and healthcare students and professionals. Studies measuring any aspect of ‘clinical empathy’ as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of the impact of empathy training on participants’ empathy levels were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials were included, with 22 providing adequate data for meta-analysis. An overall moderate effect on participant empathy postintervention (standardised mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67) was found. Heterogeneity across trial results was substantial (I(2)=63%). Data on sustainability of effect was provided by 11 trials and found a moderate effect size for improved empathy up until 12 weeks (0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.15), and a small but statistically significant effect size for sustainability at 12 weeks and beyond (standardised mean difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57). In total, 15 studies were considered to be either unclear or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that empathy-enhancing interventions can be effective at cultivating and sustaining empathy with intervention specifics contributing to effectiveness. This review focuses on an important, growing area of medical education and provides guidance to those looking to develop effective interventions to enhance empathy in the healthcare setting. Further high-quality trials are needed that include patient-led outcome assessments and further evaluate the long-term sustainability of empathy training. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42019126843). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7520826/ /pubmed/32978187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Winter, Rachel
Issa, Eyad
Roberts, Nia
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title_full Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title_short Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
title_sort assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32978187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471
work_keys_str_mv AT winterrachel assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT issaeyad assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT robertsnia assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT normanroberti assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT howickjeremy assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials