Cargando…
A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools
BACKGROUND: Chloroplasts are intracellular organelles that enable plants to conduct photosynthesis. They arose through the symbiotic integration of a prokaryotic cell into an eukaryotic host cell and still contain their own genomes with distinct genomic information. Plastid genomes accommodate essen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 |
_version_ | 1783587881679323136 |
---|---|
author | Freudenthal, Jan A. Pfaff, Simon Terhoeven, Niklas Korte, Arthur Ankenbrand, Markus J. Förster, Frank |
author_facet | Freudenthal, Jan A. Pfaff, Simon Terhoeven, Niklas Korte, Arthur Ankenbrand, Markus J. Förster, Frank |
author_sort | Freudenthal, Jan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chloroplasts are intracellular organelles that enable plants to conduct photosynthesis. They arose through the symbiotic integration of a prokaryotic cell into an eukaryotic host cell and still contain their own genomes with distinct genomic information. Plastid genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology or phylogenetics. Different assemblers that are able to assess the plastid genome have been developed. These assemblers often use data of whole genome sequencing experiments, which usually contain reads from the complete chloroplast genome. RESULTS: The performance of different assembly tools has never been systematically compared. Here, we present a benchmark of seven chloroplast assembly tools, capable of succeeding in more than 60% of known real data sets. Our results show significant differences between the tested assemblers in terms of generating whole chloroplast genome sequences and computational requirements. The examination of 105 data sets from species with unknown plastid genomes leads to the assembly of 20 novel chloroplast genomes. CONCLUSIONS: We create docker images for each tested tool that are freely available for the scientific community and ensure reproducibility of the analyses. These containers allow the analysis and screening of data sets for chloroplast genomes using standard computational infrastructure. Thus, large scale screening for chloroplasts within genomic sequencing data is feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7520963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75209632020-09-30 A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools Freudenthal, Jan A. Pfaff, Simon Terhoeven, Niklas Korte, Arthur Ankenbrand, Markus J. Förster, Frank Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Chloroplasts are intracellular organelles that enable plants to conduct photosynthesis. They arose through the symbiotic integration of a prokaryotic cell into an eukaryotic host cell and still contain their own genomes with distinct genomic information. Plastid genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology or phylogenetics. Different assemblers that are able to assess the plastid genome have been developed. These assemblers often use data of whole genome sequencing experiments, which usually contain reads from the complete chloroplast genome. RESULTS: The performance of different assembly tools has never been systematically compared. Here, we present a benchmark of seven chloroplast assembly tools, capable of succeeding in more than 60% of known real data sets. Our results show significant differences between the tested assemblers in terms of generating whole chloroplast genome sequences and computational requirements. The examination of 105 data sets from species with unknown plastid genomes leads to the assembly of 20 novel chloroplast genomes. CONCLUSIONS: We create docker images for each tested tool that are freely available for the scientific community and ensure reproducibility of the analyses. These containers allow the analysis and screening of data sets for chloroplast genomes using standard computational infrastructure. Thus, large scale screening for chloroplasts within genomic sequencing data is feasible. BioMed Central 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7520963/ /pubmed/32988404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Freudenthal, Jan A. Pfaff, Simon Terhoeven, Niklas Korte, Arthur Ankenbrand, Markus J. Förster, Frank A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title | A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title_full | A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title_fullStr | A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title_short | A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
title_sort | systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freudenthaljana asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT pfaffsimon asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT terhoevenniklas asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT kortearthur asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT ankenbrandmarkusj asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT forsterfrank asystematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT freudenthaljana systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT pfaffsimon systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT terhoevenniklas systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT kortearthur systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT ankenbrandmarkusj systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools AT forsterfrank systematiccomparisonofchloroplastgenomeassemblytools |