Cargando…
Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education
BACKGROUND: Accreditation systems are based on a number of principles and purposes that vary across jurisdictions. Decision making about accreditation governance suffers from a paucity of evidence. This paper evaluates the pros and cons of continuous quality improvement (CQI) within educational inst...
Autores principales: | Akdemir, Nesibe, Peterson, Linda N., Campbell, Craig M., Scheele, Fedde |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02124-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?
por: Akdemir, Nesibe, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How changing quality management influenced PGME accreditation: a focus on decentralization and quality improvement
por: Akdemir, Nesibe, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Effective accreditation in postgraduate medical education: from process to outcomes and back
por: Bandiera, Glen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
por: Taber, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
por: Malik, Romana Fattimah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)