Cargando…

Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective

Nonclinical development strategies for gene therapies are unique from other modalities. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associates (EFPIA) Gene Therapy Working Group surveyed EFPIA member and nonmember pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about their current practices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolt, Michael W., Whiteley, Laurence O., Lynch, Jessica L., Lauritzen, Brian, Fernández de Henestrosa, Antonio R., MacLachlan, Timothy, Ulrich, Peter, Philip, Binu K., Mahalingaiah, Prathap Kumar, Fuller, Claudette L., Compton, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.08.017
_version_ 1783588147656916992
author Bolt, Michael W.
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lynch, Jessica L.
Lauritzen, Brian
Fernández de Henestrosa, Antonio R.
MacLachlan, Timothy
Ulrich, Peter
Philip, Binu K.
Mahalingaiah, Prathap Kumar
Fuller, Claudette L.
Compton, David R.
author_facet Bolt, Michael W.
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lynch, Jessica L.
Lauritzen, Brian
Fernández de Henestrosa, Antonio R.
MacLachlan, Timothy
Ulrich, Peter
Philip, Binu K.
Mahalingaiah, Prathap Kumar
Fuller, Claudette L.
Compton, David R.
author_sort Bolt, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description Nonclinical development strategies for gene therapies are unique from other modalities. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associates (EFPIA) Gene Therapy Working Group surveyed EFPIA member and nonmember pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about their current practices for designing and implementing nonclinical toxicology studies to support the development of viral vector-delivered in vivo gene therapies. Compiled responses from 17 companies indicated that these studies had some variability in species selection, study-design elements, biodistribution, immunogenicity or genomic insertion assessments, safety pharmacology, and regulatory interactions. Although there was some consistency in general practice, there were examples of extreme case-by-case differences. The responses and variability are discussed herein. Key development challenges were also identified. Results from this survey emphasize the importance for harmonization of regulatory guidelines for the development of gene-therapy products, while still allowing for case-by-case flexibility in nonclinical toxicology studies. However, the appropriate timing for a harmonized guidance, particularly with a platform that continues to rapidly evolve, remains in question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7522289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75222892020-10-05 Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective Bolt, Michael W. Whiteley, Laurence O. Lynch, Jessica L. Lauritzen, Brian Fernández de Henestrosa, Antonio R. MacLachlan, Timothy Ulrich, Peter Philip, Binu K. Mahalingaiah, Prathap Kumar Fuller, Claudette L. Compton, David R. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Original Article Nonclinical development strategies for gene therapies are unique from other modalities. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associates (EFPIA) Gene Therapy Working Group surveyed EFPIA member and nonmember pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about their current practices for designing and implementing nonclinical toxicology studies to support the development of viral vector-delivered in vivo gene therapies. Compiled responses from 17 companies indicated that these studies had some variability in species selection, study-design elements, biodistribution, immunogenicity or genomic insertion assessments, safety pharmacology, and regulatory interactions. Although there was some consistency in general practice, there were examples of extreme case-by-case differences. The responses and variability are discussed herein. Key development challenges were also identified. Results from this survey emphasize the importance for harmonization of regulatory guidelines for the development of gene-therapy products, while still allowing for case-by-case flexibility in nonclinical toxicology studies. However, the appropriate timing for a harmonized guidance, particularly with a platform that continues to rapidly evolve, remains in question. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7522289/ /pubmed/33024793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.08.017 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bolt, Michael W.
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lynch, Jessica L.
Lauritzen, Brian
Fernández de Henestrosa, Antonio R.
MacLachlan, Timothy
Ulrich, Peter
Philip, Binu K.
Mahalingaiah, Prathap Kumar
Fuller, Claudette L.
Compton, David R.
Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title_full Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title_fullStr Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title_short Nonclinical Studies that Support Viral Vector-Delivered Gene Therapies: An EFPIA Gene Therapy Working Group Perspective
title_sort nonclinical studies that support viral vector-delivered gene therapies: an efpia gene therapy working group perspective
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.08.017
work_keys_str_mv AT boltmichaelw nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT whiteleylaurenceo nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT lynchjessical nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT lauritzenbrian nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT fernandezdehenestrosaantonior nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT maclachlantimothy nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT ulrichpeter nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT philipbinuk nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT mahalingaiahprathapkumar nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT fullerclaudettel nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective
AT comptondavidr nonclinicalstudiesthatsupportviralvectordeliveredgenetherapiesanefpiagenetherapyworkinggroupperspective